Reference to Sue Ann covering for Blair in Dope. They wonder why Nancy all of a sudden decided to come upstairs to the girls room as she's never done that before. How there's no phone in the room. She IS the only lost girl to do so in the cafeteria bedroom if I remember correctly.

Reference to Sue Ann covering for Blair in Dope.
How does Sue Ann cover for Blair? What are they meaning?


They wonder why Nancy all of a sudden decided to come upstairs to the girls room as she's never done that before.
Well I've always believed it's implied that she has. It's only natural for the Lost Girls to have visited the Exiled Girls in their room.


How there's no phone in the room.
Of course there's not, this is probation, not Paradise! :lol:


She IS the only lost girl to do so in the cafeteria bedroom if I remember correctly.
Yup, the only girls to go in that room at all are, I believe, Nancy, Alison, Annie, and Alexandra (if you're a girl, you have to have an "a" and an "n" in your name to get past the door, lol).

I guess Sue Ann covering the lipstick was hers? Yeah I'm sure the lost girls visited with their old buds.

"Tootie was so desperate in this episode she was willing to talk to Nancy" LOL

New episode is up. This week they discuss “Gossip”. At approximately 1:00:14, Britt shares that Julie Piekarski dm’d her on Twitter to say hi. Britt shared a link to FOF’s first episode in return...! Julie Piekarski now has an open invite to FOF.

Weirdly, the episode hasn't shown up in my iTunes feed. Not sure what's going on.

Weirdly, the episode hasn't shown up in my iTunes feed. Not sure what's going on.

It took 4 hours to show up for me for some reason.

It took 4 hours to show up for me for some reason.
Good to know I'm not the only one having issues tonight with this podcast.

Good to know I'm not the only one having issues tonight with this podcast.

Yeah it was very weird

1:02:00 they get to Sue Ann and Cindy, (both mentioned by name Eights) Britt thinks C & SA were wearing the exact same clothes the last time we saw them :lol: Reference to Cindy being a lesbian again.

Dominick tries to justify for us lost girl fans that Sue Ann and Cindy were resentful of Mrs G for ignoring them lately, spending all her time with the new girl Jo even though they're the good kids not stealing the school van.

As Sitcommania mentioned Britt was DM'ed by Julie on twitter. She pronounced her last name like I thought it was pronounced "puh-kar-ski" instead of "pie-kar-ski" but its an easy mistake. Britt responded saying "we love you"

They hope to have her on the podcast and feed her with some Chinesefood, as Mr Bradley calls it, in honor of Dieting.

1:02:00 they get to Sue Ann and Cindy, (both mentioned by name Eights) Britt thinks C & SA were wearing the exact same clothes the last time we saw them :lol: Reference to Cindy being a lesbian again.
Um, no, they weren't. Cindy was wearing, as Margie Peters would say, "pornographic shorts", and Sue Ann was wearing something different, surely; at least, her hair was vastly different, anyway. But I think her outfit was somewhat different too.

What was the Cindy reference?

Um, no, they weren't. Cindy was wearing, as Margie Peters would say, "pornographic shorts", and Sue Ann was wearing something different, surely; at least, her hair was vastly different, anyway. But I think her outfit was somewhat different too.

What was the Cindy reference?

Haha I think they meant it was similar: Cindy in a sports outfit, Sue Ann in whatever. Just that she questioned her sexuality in the pilot.

Dominick tries to justify for us lost girl fans that Sue Ann and Cindy were resentful of Mrs G for ignoring them lately, spending all her time with the new girl Jo even though they're the good kids not stealing the school van.
Why does he try this? lol They heard something outrageously unbelievable about someone they knew, so it's only natural they would tell someone.


As Sitcommania mentioned Britt was DM'ed by Julie on twitter. They hope to have her on the podcast
Lemme get this straight: they insult her character, perhaps her as a person, drop the F-bomb all over the place, insult this show, and they "hope to have her on the podcast"?? Good luck, guys.


and feed her with some Chinesefood, as Mr Bradley calls it, in honor of Dieting.

Hahahaha! That always bothers me so much when I watch that episode! "You see, ev'rybody loves Chinese FOOD." Why did he say it like that???

Hahahaha! That always bothers me so much when I watch that episode! "You see, ev'rybody loves Chinese FOOD." Why did he say it like that???

And why didn't they just re-take that scene, after he said it like that?! :eek:

I mean, even in the 1970s, no-one called it Chinese FOOD, that I can recall.

And why didn't they just re-take that scene, after he said it like that?! :eek:

I mean, even in the 1970s, no-one called it Chinese FOOD, that I can recall.

I wouldn't know ;) I come from an era where we had a multitude of foods from across the world readily available.

Why does he try this? lol They heard something outrageously unbelievable about someone they knew, so it's only natural they would tell someone.


Haha don't take em too seriously, Eights. They're mostly harmless. And they got Cindy's name right. :lol:

I finally got to listen to the podcast, but only by going to iTunes through the Store panel, rather than the Library panel, like usual.

There's a nice shout out to us in this podcast.

Britt and Dominik make the good point that Cindy and Sue Ann should have been punished, along with Tootie, for spreading gossip. I couldn't agree more.

Lemme get this straight: they insult her character, perhaps her as a person, drop the F-bomb all over the place, insult this show, and they "hope to have her on the podcast"?? Good luck, guys.


I doubt Julie Pie will appear, but if there was anyone willing to appear on the podcast, it would be her. However, I think Dominik made too many anti-Sue Ann comments for that to happen. Still, I'd LOVE it.

I wouldn't know ;) I come from an era where we had a multitude of foods from across the world readily available.

I was around 16 before I ever even had fried rice. It just wasn't available until then. And I adore fried rice.

Britt and Dominik make the good point that Cindy and Sue Ann should have been punished, along with Tootie, for spreading gossip. I couldn't agree more.

I mean, they do help Tootie. Plus they were only going by what Tootie said. If it was true they might've told out of concern. As Nat says later on, it could really help Mrs G in the long run.
I doubt Julie Pie will appear, but if there was anyone willing to appear on the podcast, it would be her. However, I think Dominik made too many anti-Sue Ann comments for that to happen. Still, I'd LOVE it.

True, I think the way Dominick loves Felice would make her possible if she ever did anything like that.

I was around 16 before I ever even had fried rice. It just wasn't available until then. And I adore fried rice.

:eek: Wow!

And why didn't they just re-take that scene, after he said it like that?! :eek:

I mean, even in the 1970s, no-one called it Chinese FOOD, that I can recall.
Of course, over in China, they just call it "food".

#chandlerbing ;)

There's a nice shout out to us in this podcast.
What?? Lorsie didn't say that!! What did they say??


Britt and Dominik make the good point that Cindy and Sue Ann should have been punished, along with Tootie, for spreading gossip. I couldn't agree more.
Oh Retro, there you go again being so hard on our girls! :lol:
Tootie was the rootie of the problem (see what I did there?), so I'm glad we saw her learn her lesson (and really, it was the whole campus taking part), although, what I have a problem with is how suddenly and easily Blair and Jo agree to help her out. This is just MOMENTS after they yell at her and compete to see who clobbers her first. Jo got badmouthed on campus, friendships were (temporarily) torn apart, but it's "Wait'll I GET you!" and then 2 second later, "Come on, we'll help her :)"

:confused:

I was a bratty younger sibling in my day, and I bet if I had caused that kind of bad drama among my sister and her friends, they sure wouldn't have been so agreeable to help me out of my punishment so soon after causing such fireworks.

It seems more natural if Blair and Jo walked away seething*, and the other girls helped Tootie. Or if Tootie had given a sincere lengthy apology of learning her lesson, then I could understand them helping her more.

Since there were 10, 12 girls in that scene, Tootie had no shortage of help. ;)

*(I can no longer use this word without thinking of The Croc's funniest part in TGS! :lol:)

What?? Lorsie didn't say that!! What did they say??

Just that "We know fans of the Lost Girls are listening..." :lol:



Oh Retro, there you go again being so hard on our girls! :lol:
Tootie was the rootie of the problem (see what I did there?), so I'm glad we saw her learn her lesson (and really, it was the whole campus taking part), although, what I have a problem with is how suddenly and easily Blair and Jo agree to help her out. This is just MOMENTS after they yell at her and compete to see who clobbers her first. Jo got badmouthed on campus, friendships were (temporarily) torn apart, but it's "Wait'll I GET you!" and then 2 second later, "Come on, we'll help her :)"

:confused:

I was a bratty younger sibling in my day, and I bet if I had caused that kind of bad drama among my sister and her friends, they sure wouldn't have been so agreeable to help me out of my punishment so soon after causing such fireworks.

It seems more natural if Blair and Jo walked away seething*, and the other girls helped Tootie. Or if Tootie had given a sincere lengthy apology of learning her lesson, then I could understand them helping her more.

Since there were 10, 12 girls in that scene, Tootie had no shortage of help. ;)

*(I can no longer use this word without thinking of The Croc's funniest part in TGS! :lol:)

They mention what you mention: that it seems unrealistic for Blair and Jo to help Tootie when they were mad at her seconds earlier.

But I posit the idea that they saw a young kid tasked with a gigantic chore that she'd only manage with great difficulty, saw the good example set by Natalie, and their hearts softened.

And even still, Cindy and Sue Ann should have been punished in some way. Volunteering to help out someone else who has been punished is not actual punishment.

Of course, over in China, they just call it "food".

#chandlerbing ;)

Haha!! :lol: Yeah, I remember that line. Of course, what does Chandler know about China? He only went to Yemen! :lol:

Haha!! :lol: Yeah, I remember that line. Of course, what does Chandler know about China? He only went to Yemen! :lol:

:lol: Oh my god!

Just that "We know fans of the Lost Girls are listening..." :lol:
Haha, nice.


They mention what you mention: that it seems unrealistic for Blair and Jo to help Tootie when they were mad at her seconds earlier.

But I posit the idea that they saw a young kid tasked with a gigantic chore that she'd only manage with great difficulty, saw the good example set by Natalie, and their hearts softened.
Fine, but their hearts softened too quickly to be believable for the situation, IMO. It feels very contrived to me.


And even still, Cindy and Sue Ann should have been punished in some way.
Well, even if they did deserve any punishment, that wouldn't fit the structure of the episode. This was Tootie's story. As a viewer, Blair and Jo's sudden 180 is much more bothering and jolting to me.

Ya know, I don't why they call this "The ONLY Facts of Life Podcast" when there is another one, "Let's Face the Facts". So they shouldn't claim that as part of their title.

And now for a little humor on the whole gossip thing, borrowing from another thread ;)

-

Ya know, I don't why they call this "The ONLY Facts of Life Podcast" when there is another one, "Let's Face the Facts". So they shouldn't claim that as part of their title.

They have referenced this in their last ep review Teenage Marriage

And now for a little humor on the whole gossip thing, borrowing from another thread ;)

-

:rofl:

Ya know, I don't why they call this "The ONLY Facts of Life Podcast" when there is another one, "Let's Face the Facts". So they shouldn't claim that as part of their title.

Yeah, they didn't know, when they were coming up with the name, that they would soon have competition.

And now for a little humor on the whole gossip thing, borrowing from another thread ;)

-
:lol:

Ahahahaha! Very, very funny, '80s!

:lol: Oh my god!
:lol::lol::lol::lol:

And what a clever fake address: "15 Yemen Road, Yemen." :lol:

"Tootie was so desperate in this episode she was willing to talk to Nancy" LOL
:rofl:

:rofl:
That was a pretty clever line...

I wish the whole podcasts were like that! I just glean the nuggets from you guys here. If I were gonna listen to a podcast, based on the opinions and reviews you guys have given here, I bet I would jump over to "Let's Face the Facts" instead.

New ep up. I get the feeling Breaking Point was torture for them to watch but I'll listen for lost girl refs.

New ep up. I get the feeling Breaking Point was torture for them to watch but I'll listen for lost girl refs.

Oh, I bet there will be. I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a name comparison between "Cindy" and "Cynthia", or if there were talk of if the show had killed off a Lost Girl instead.

Oh, I bet there will be. I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a name comparison between "Cindy" and "Cynthia", or if there were talk of if the show had killed off a Lost Girl instead.
Haha maybe. They did say it's the worst episode to date, so I guess season 1 is vindicated now. ;)

Haha maybe. They did say it's the worst episode to date, so I guess season 1 is vindicated now. ;)

:lol:

Okay, you were funny at the end there, but they say it's the worst one to date? Omg. Now, saddest, yes, but it is nowhere near a "worst" episode.

:lol:

Okay, you were funny at the end there, but they say it's the worst one to date? Omg. Now, saddest, yes, but it is nowhere near a "worst" episode.

They seem to imply season 1 wasnt as bad as they thought. Idk, Brit doesn't like that every ep seems to be "A very special"

They seem to imply season 1 wasn't as bad as they thought.

"We told you so!" :lol:


Idk, Brit doesn't like that every ep seems to be "A very special"

Well then what the heck is she doing watching this show? :lol:

But they weren't "very special" in the sense that the DS ones were. They were learning facts of life! (hint, that's the show's title, lol)

This is just one of the most serious of the shows they did, and they did it very well.

"We told you so!" :lol:




Well then what the heck is she doing watching this show? :lol:

But they weren't "very special" in the sense that the DS ones were. They were learning facts of life! (hint, that's the show's title, lol)

This is just one of the most serious of the shows they did, and they did it very well.

Haha thats definitely true. DS had truly bizarre eps for a sitcom.

They all agree that their reaction to Cynthia being unconscious being to make fudge is bizarre and makes Mrs G seem unstable.
They say Jo is the sociopath of the ep instead of Tootie.

Another thing to note, they sure like to imitate Jo. They should just stick to Mrs Garrett. No connections to Cindy or about the lost girls btw, Eights.

Another thing to note, they sure like to imitate Jo. They should just stick to Mrs Garrett. No connections to Cindy or about the lost girls btw, Eights.

Yeah, they definitely overdo the Jo impressions; still, I laughed at some of their lines this week.

Indeed no Lost Girls mention this week, but they will certainly have plenty to say about them next week, during "Sex Symbol".

Well then what the heck is she doing watching this show? :lol:


I'm sure that's a question Britt asks herself every episode. I guess she agreed to do it as a favor to Dominick, and doesn't have the heart to go back on her promise.

Admittedly, Britt does an often-excellent Mrs. Garrett impression, so I'm glad she has continued doing the podcasts. It's also nice getting the perspective of a FOL virgin. I still can't believe there was any American alive in the 1980s who has never seen The Facts of Life, and it makes me wonder if Britt was raised in a cloistered nunnery or something. :lol:

I'm sure that's a question Britt asks herself every episode. I guess she agreed to do it as a favor to Dominick, and doesn't have the heart to go back on her promise.

Admittedly, Britt does an often-excellent Mrs. Garrett impression, so I'm glad she has continued doing the podcasts. It's also nice getting the perspective of a FOL virgin. I still can't believe there was any American alive in the 1980s who has never seen The Facts of Life, and it makes me wonder if Britt was raised in a cloistered nunnery or something. :lol:
She said she was raised in the Bronx like Jo.

She said she was raised in the Bronx like Jo.
Yeah, but surely they had TV even in Da Bronx!

Yeah, but surely they had TV even in Da Bronx!

Maybe they couldn’t afford one.

They all agree that their reaction to Cynthia being unconscious being to make fudge is bizarre and makes Mrs G seem unstable.
Well they have to do something, and their expertise is in the kitchen. And it's not "their reaction to it", it's something they're doing for Cynthia once she comes to (which, unfortunately, we know doesn't happen).

Now, if their reaction had been to go out on the lawn and do Romanian interpretive dance, that would be a bizarre reaction.


They say Jo is the sociopath of the ep instead of Tootie.

Uhhhh, why? :confused:

No connections to Cindy or about the lost girls btw, Eights.

Always appreciate ya lookin' out for me, bud! :cheers:

Indeed no Lost Girls mention this week, but they will certainly have plenty to say about them next week, during "Sex Symbol".

I shudder at the thought!

[shudders]

I'm sure that's a question Britt asks herself every episode.

I can't believe you guys listen to podcasts every week! I listened to two, Nancy McKeon and Tracy Wells, and it takes a whole chunk of time out to listen to these! :lol:

I can't believe you guys listen to podcasts every week! I listened to two, Nancy McKeon and Tracy Wells, and it takes a whole chunk of time out to listen to these! :lol:

Not if you multitask! ;)

I can't believe you guys listen to podcasts every week! I listened to two, Nancy McKeon and Tracy Wells, and it takes a whole chunk of time out to listen to these! :lol:
Like Lorimar, I multitask: I usually listen to FOF Podcast while posting on this board. So when SM or Lorimar post that a new episode is up, I turn on the podcast.

Sometimes, I wish they wouldn't go into so many tangents that have nothing to do with FOL. But you take the good, you take the bad, and there you have... well, a messy podcast that at times is quite amusing, sometimes disrespectful of some young actresses, always profane... but... um... what was I saying?

I listen for any Lost Girls content, because D&B have been better than they used to be. Not sure what I'll do after Season Three, when we get past "Green-Eyed Monster". As you know, after that, it's just flashbacks and one final, glorious (to me) episode: The Little Chill.

Like Lorimar, I multitask: I usually listen to FOF Podcast while posting on this board. So when SM or Lorimar post that a new episode is up, I turn on the podcast.

Sometimes, I wish they wouldn't go into so many tangents that have nothing to do with FOL. But you take the good, you take the bad, and there you have... well, a messy podcast that at times is quite amusing, sometimes disrespectful of some young actresses, always profane... but... um... what was I saying?

I listen for any Lost Girls content, because D&B have been better than they used to be. Not sure what I'll do after Season Three, when we get past "Green-Eyed Monster". As you know, after that, it's just flashbacks and one final, glorious (to me) episode: The Little Chill.
Yeah my listening is mostly for lost girl connections as well.

Haha, yeah, I was on the computer some during Nancy and Tracy's podcasts, but I was so invested in them I had to just "listen" a lot of the time.

And one Sunday I thought I'd multi-task while listening to a couple of "Oh I Had That!" '80s flashback pop culture podcasts (that one I mentioned that discussed FOL a bit among other '80s shows), and I planned to get some chores done around here while doing so, but I just couldn't. It was too distracting, lol.


Not sure what I'll do after Season Three, when we get past "Green-Eyed Monster." As you know, after that, it's just flashbacks"

No it's not! [puts fingers in ears] Lala laaa! Lala laaaa! lol...that's such a negative thought! You have to think that Lost Girls could show up anywhere, like at the Box Lunch party. Scan the crowd, hope to see someone there! Look around at the graduates for Nancy and Sue Ann!

Like Pandora*, ya gotta have hope. ;)

*(though she's no heroine!)

But really, they will have Lost Girl talk far beyond that, believe me. You know how I know? Because even though I don't listen to them, I see you guys saying how they'll mention the Lost Girls in non-Lost Girl episodes. So I'm sure they'll bring them up, especially when they see the core four acquiring Lost Girl attributes ("What's Tootie doing with a camera again? Wasn't that Molly's thing?")

No it's not! [puts fingers in ears] Lala laaa! Lala laaaa! lol...that's such a negative thought! You have to think that Lost Girls could show up anywhere, like at the Box Lunch party. Scan the crowd, hope to see someone there! Look around at the graduates for Nancy and Sue Ann!

I wish!


But really, they will have Lost Girl talk far beyond that, believe me. You know how I know? Because even though I don't listen to them, I see you guys saying how they'll mention the Lost Girls in non-Lost Girl episodes. So I'm sure they'll bring them up, especially when they see the core four acquiring Lost Girl attributes ("What's Tootie doing with a camera again? Wasn't that Molly's thing?")

Sure, for a while they'll mention them occasionally, then the references will get further and further apart, as the girls' hair gets bigger and the shoulder pads grow ever larger... :(

I wish!



Sure, for a while they'll mention them occasionally, then the references will get further and further apart, as the girls' hair gets bigger and the shoulder pads grow ever larger... :(

:(:eek:

then the references will get further and further apart, as the girls' hair gets bigger and the shoulder pads grow ever larger... :(
I think it's fun to see them actually exhibit '80s fashion. I just don't like when it goes too far, like Jo's HORRENDOUS helmet hair of season 6.1 (first half of season 6), and Blair's MISERABLE mullet of season 6.1, and her PLEASE-make-it-go-away!! perm of season 7.1! lol

I think it's fun to see them actually exhibit '80s fashion. I just don't like when it goes too far, like Jo's HORRENDOUS helmet hair of season 6.1 (first half of season 6), and Blair's MISERABLE mullet of season 6.1, and her PLEASE-make-it-go-away!! perm of season 7.1! lol

Jo's bad hair lasts all the way til the end of s8.

Jo's bad hair lasts all the way til the end of s8.
Well, I think the helmet at least changes some, lol.

Well, I think the helmet at least changes some, lol.

Lol maybe but its still bad

They’re back! Dom, Britt, and Grant discuss “Sex Symbol”. It’s a bit racy lol, but they do discuss The Lost Girls for anyone who’s interested. Britt is honing a good impression of Jo in addition to Mrs. G.

They’re back! Dom, Britt, and Grant discuss “Sex Symbol”. It’s a bit racy lol, but they do discuss The Lost Girls for anyone who’s interested. Britt is honing a good impression of Jo in addition to Mrs. G.

Finally!

Well they have to discuss The Lost Girls, so good.

Lorsie, bring back a good LG report! :typing:

Well they have to discuss The Lost Girls, so good.

Lorsie, bring back a good LG report! :typing:

Sure thing :D

OK so they mention the start of the episode has some blond girl tap Jo like they're at some sort of lesbian mixer. Jo rolls her eyes and the audience laughs. What they FAIL to mention is that blond girl was SUE ANN!!!!

LOL!

I wouldn't expect anything less. ;)

They mention Natalie wearing one of Molly's bow ties. Dom mentions people online complaining about him talking his sex life! :lol: (Shout out Retro!)

They mention Natalie wearing one of Molly's bow ties.
Haha!


Dom mentions people online complaining about him talking about his sex life! :lol: (Shout out Retro!)
Ahhhhh,hahahaha! :rofl:

For mentioning Retros comment they sure do have a lot of dirty talk in this ep, more than usual. I guess the subject let them run wild....

Heres a rundown of lost girl stuff:

-Dom thought Homerun Helen was Nancy at first when Blair was scooping food for her.

-Apparently HRH was always behind Nancy in her scene so it looks like a twilight zone episode. Joking that HRH was staring at Nancy the whole time trying to say she's her older sister, or even Nancy herself after Roger gets her pregnant.

-Dom comments Cindy is starting to look a little old for braids.

-The guest comments how interesting it is that brought back these girls just to $%&^ on Natalie.

-They all agree that its interesting that the 3 share the same exact POV and may be why they got rid of them.

-They say Cindy's Frank Sinatra joke was awful.

-How weird it is that Nancy is prudish since she has Roger.

-Joke that the lost girls are locked in a closet starved for a storyline and ate Molly to survive.

-Roger says all the Bates boys are trying to get a date with Natalie. Not a particularly interesting note but I myself don't remember this line, must have forgot.

-They comment Nancy only has Roger and her records. Cindy had the lesbian thing but now just has the braids.

-Point out that Tootie is hypocritical considering she, Blair, and Jo were laughing at the idea of Nat as a sex symbol but when the lost girls do it she's mad at them.

-They wonder how Nat could have a worse reputation than HRH

-When they get to Sue Ann saying "You can do during the day what you do at night" they mention how Sue Ann likes afternoon delight. Im guessing they mean Julie Pie?

-Dom thinks it could've been interesting bringing the lost girls around regularly to antagonize the main girls. Dom says Sue Ann and Nancy are believable at being mean but Cindy seems more sweet. She also seems 40? Britt responds "Whatever I don't even bother about her". Eights right now --->:sarah:

-Dom thought Homerun Helen was Nancy at first when Blair was scooping food for her.
O...kay. lol They don't even look alike.


-Dom comments Cindy is starting to look a little old for braids
But it was her hair trademark.


-The guest comments how interesting it is that brought back these girls just to $%&^ on Natalie.
Yup, exactly.


-They all agree that its interesting that the 3 share the same exact POV and may be why they got rid of them.
Um, they only had the same POV here AFTER they were gotten rid of (hello!).


-They say Cindy's Frank Sinatra joke was awful.
What "Frank Sinatra joke"??


-How weird it is that Nancy is prudish since she has Roger
Yes, but she and Roger were (in my faniverse) chaste; they had never gotten so advanced by that point.


-They comment Nancy only has Roger and her records. Cindy had the lesbian thing but now just has the braids.
Um, hello? And her athleticism.


-Point out that Tootie is hypocritical considering she, Blair, and Jo were laughing at the idea of Nat as a sex symbol but when the lost girls do it she's mad at them.
No, it's different. Tootie, Blair, and Jo laughed at the idea people could actually think Natalie would be "that kind of girl". The Lost Girls actually believe Natalie's bad reputation (despite their having lived with her the previous year---bad writing decision).


-When they get to Sue Ann saying "You can do during the day what you do at night" they mention how Sue Ann likes afternoon delight. Im guessing they mean Julie Pie?
It sounds like they're insinuating Sue Ann likes having fun with boys in the afternoon.


-Dom thinks it could've been interesting bringing the lost girls around regularly to antagonize the main girls.
Um, sure, "interesting", but betraying their characters (Lost Girls).


Dom says Sue Ann and Nancy are believable at being mean but Cindy seems more sweet.
Aww, Dom. :)


She also seems 40?
Um, Dom. :nonono:


Britt responds "Whatever I don't even bother about her". Eights right now --->:sarah:
OOOooooo JEALOUS MUCH, Britt???? ;)

Kidding, haha, but really, what an odd thing to say. I could understand hearing that about wallpaper Nancy before hearing that about sexually confused, sports-loving, competitive, insecure Cindy. I love how we get to know Cindy so personally in "Rough Housing" right off the bat. :)

O...kay. lol They don't even look alike.



But it was her hair trademark.

Lol just like Cindy Brady

Yup, exactly.



Um, they only had the same POV here AFTER they were gotten rid of (hello!).

I thought the same lol

What "Frank Sinatra joke"??

Saturday isn’t the loneliest night for Natalie

Yes, but she and Roger were (in my faniverse) chaste; they had never gotten so advanced by that point.



Um, hello? And her athleticism.



No, it's different. Tootie, Blair, and Jo laughed at the idea people could actually think Natalie would be "that kind of girl". The Lost Girls actually believe Natalie's bad reputation (despite their having lived with her the previous year---bad writing decision).



It sounds like they're insinuating Sue Ann likes having fun with boys in the afternoon.

:eek:

Um, sure, "interesting", but betraying their characters (Lost Girls).



Aww, Dom. :)



Um, Dom. :nonono:



OOOooooo JEALOUS MUCH, Britt???? ;)

Kidding, haha, but really, what an odd thing to say. I could understand hearing that about wallpaper Nancy before hearing that about sexually confused, sports-loving, competitive, insecure Cindy. I love how we get to know Cindy so personally in "Rough Housing" right off the bat. :)
Maybe hearing Dom obsess over her and the fact she had a storyline 1 episode ago stuck with her.

Saturday isn’t the loneliest night for Natalie
Even knowing it's a song, it still fits the story. I never knew that was a song, much less a Frank Sinatra song. :baby: I just thought it was a saying; hence, it works for me. Get 'em, Cinds! ;)

Weirdly, none of the FOF Podcast people caught that it was Sue Ann who tapped Jo on the shoulder at the beginning of the episode; Dom claims it's a girl we've "never seen" before. They also don't catch that Jo is rolling her eyes at Blair, and they wonder why the audience laughs.

They also mentioned Molly's bolo-type tie that Natalie wears at the beginning of this episode.

Their theory that Mr. Bradley transferred to Bates was pretty cute, as is the theory about where they were keeping the Lost Girls (in that attic space they later kept Kevin, and apparently ate Molly).

I also laughed at Dominick's comment about George Clooney and Nancy McKeon having the "same hair" for two seasons.

OK so they mention the start of the episode has some blond girl tap Jo like they're at some sort of lesbian mixer. Jo rolls her eyes and the audience laughs. What they FAIL to mention is that blond girl was SUE ANN!!!!

Haha! I noticed the same exact thing! WTF? None of the three of them noticed it was Sue Ann!? :lol:

They’re back! Dom, Britt, and Grant discuss “Sex Symbol”. It’s a bit racy lol, but they do discuss The Lost Girls for anyone who’s interested. Britt is honing a good impression of Jo in addition to Mrs. G.

I do enjoy the impressions. Britt's Jo is quite funny, and her Mrs. G is spot on!

They mention Natalie wearing one of Molly's bow ties. Dom mentions people online complaining about him talking his sex life! :lol: (Shout out Retro!)

Haha! :lol:

I don't think I'm the only one complaining about all the sex talk; I saw similar reviews on iTunes.

Haha! I noticed the same exact thing! WTF? None of the three of them noticed it was Sue Ann!? :lol:

Right? Hopefully they notice our posts to correct themselves

Haha! :lol:

I don't think I'm the only one complaining about all the sex talk; I saw similar reviews on iTunes.

Take the shoutout ;)

Right? Hopefully they notice our posts to correct themselves

I could maybe understand them not seeing Cindy and Nancy standing in the background of the scene, but the fact that that's Sue Ann is sooooo obvious. She's RIGHT THERE! :lol:

Take the shoutout ;)

:lol:

I could maybe understand them not seeing Cindy and Nancy standing in the background of the scene
Hey!

:mad:

Hey!

:mad:

Well, Cindy was just in the background of that scene, just as much as Nancy.

Well, Cindy was just in the background of that scene, just as much as Nancy.

Actually I do notice Cindy in the scene but I’ve never found Nancy. Maybe she blends in with the wallpaper? ;)

Actually I do notice Cindy in the scene but I’ve never found Nancy. Maybe she blends in with the wallpaper? ;)
Now that's more like it! :D

(and I see what you mean, Retro; I thought you were speaking more philosophically; but Cindy is right there pretty much center screen, repeatedly, which is awesome! :clap: )

Actually I do notice Cindy in the scene but I’ve never found Nancy. Maybe she blends in with the wallpaper? ;)

Haha! But actually, Nancy can be seen at 2:41 in this video (https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6osnqm), standing next to Sue Ann. She's wearing a purple dress, while Sue Ann wears orange and Cindy wears a green shirt with a black sweater. Cindy can be seen more easily because she's closer to the middle of the room, and is standing behind Neil by the punch bowl.

At 3:00, Blair walks by Cindy, and Cindy starts to greet her, but Blair walks right by, twice, ignoring her. Maybe this helps explain Cindy's lashing out at Natalie later in the episode: she's jealous of all the time Blair is spending with Natalie and Tootie, and Jo, instead of coming over and hanging out in Dorm B... or at least talking to her at the party!

At 4:00, we see Blair and Nancy talking happily, so Nancy's behavior to Natalie isn't as easily explained.

Haha! But actually, Nancy can be seen at 2:41 in this video (https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6osnqm), standing next to Sue Ann. She's wearing a purple dress, while Sue Ann wears orange and Cindy wears a green shirt with a black sweater. Cindy can be seen more easily because she's closer to the middle of the room, and is standing behind Neil by the punch bowl.

At 3:00, Blair walks by Cindy, and Cindy starts to greet her, but Blair walks right by, twice, ignoring her. Maybe this helps explain Cindy's lashing out at Natalie later in the episode: she's jealous of all the time Blair is spending with Natalie and Tootie, and Jo, instead of coming over and hanging out in Dorm B... or at least talking to her at the party!

At 4:00, we see Blair and Nancy talking happily, so Nancy's behavior to Natalie isn't as easily explained.
Ah thanks! I see her now! It looks like Cindy whispered to Blair and Blair seemed to respond. Looks like Blair is gossiping with both Nancy AND Sue Ann, which makes sense since they were pretty close in age.

Ah thanks! I see her now! It looks like Cindy whispered to Blair and Blair seemed to respond.

Haha, that makes it looks like Blair's doing laps around the counter! :lol:

Haha, that makes it looks like Blair's doing laps around the counter! :lol:

YEP! She passes Cindy TWICE! :lol:

YEP! She passes Cindy TWICE! :lol:
She's going after Sue Ann's 880!! :rofl:

She's going after Sue Ann's 880!! :rofl:
Ahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

Careful, Blair! Even Cindy's not supposed to go after Sue Ann's 880!

Is anyone listening to the other podcast, Let’s Face the Facts? He’s up to “Bought and Sold”.

Is anyone listening to the other podcast, Let’s Face the Facts? He’s up to “Bought and Sold”.
Already? Wow, he's faster than FOF.

I figured I'd catch up this summer.

Already? Wow, he's faster than FOF.

I figured I'd catch up this summer.

Apparently faster and nicer! If I were gonna 'pod some "Facts", that'd be the one I'd listen to.

Yes, it’s cleaner. The host really does like the show, but he skips a lot of funny jokes and moments that happened in the episode; for example, Natalie telling Mrs. G it’s ten minutes before the awards. He uses the act break to kind of interview the guest and it can get a tad boring. Dom and Britt really make a meal out of the episodes, I must admit. Lol

Ep 12 is up! At around 31:10 they mention that they screwed up last week and that Sue Ann was the pretzel girl.

I think this may have been the first episode Britt actually liked! :lol:

Ep 12 is up! At around 31:10 they mention that they screwed up last week and that Sue Ann was the pretzel girl.

Glad someone set them straight! Still can't believe the three of them didn't recognize Sue Ann.

They mentioned the Lost Girls several times. One time was when Dominik mentioned he thinks Alex Rocco likely cost more money than Sue Ann, Cindy, and Nancy combined. (He's likely right, as Alex Rocco was a well-established actor at that time). They also mentioned Nancy as well as Roger's penis. :eek:

Yes that Tootie saw Rogers'.... member.... by steaming open Nancy's mail.

EEK! :eek: Not my "Facts"! LOL :nonono:

EEK! :eek: Not my "Facts"! LOL :nonono:

:lol:

Episode 13 is posted. They mention how weird it was at the beginning to have someone not named Nancy on the the phone with someone not named Roger (Blair with some guy) and how Blair kept saying his name over and over which was weird. They understood when Nancy did it because that was the only thing she did that got her a laugh; saying "Roger".

LOL they mention Tootie taking a picture of Jo and Blair shaking hands and says she named it "Buddies Forever 2" which got a big laugh from the others. Im surprised they remembered.

They mention how Nancy didn't even get a number for her interview. They say how Nancy is putting on lip gloss and its probably the fifth or sixth take of her doing that because she looks like she had lip injections. They wonder if this was the only scene with Nancy where Roger doesn't get mentioned. They say its strange how Blair calls Nancy striking "like the polish workers" and think thats a more Molly esq comment. They think it makes more sense if it was meant for Jo to say it.

Oh, Britt. How can you confuse The Addams Family and The Munsters? "Cousin Eddie"? :lol:

Oh, Britt. How can you confuse The Addams Family and The Munsters? "Cousin Eddie"? :lol:

LOL

Yes that Tootie saw Rogers'.... member.... by steaming open Nancy's mail.
...And your comment was called out in this week's podcast, at about 49 minutes in. Congrats, Lorimar!

They mention how Nancy didn't even get a number for her interview. They say how Nancy is putting on lip gloss and its probably the fifth or sixth take of her doing that because she looks like she had lip injections. They wonder if this was the only scene with Nancy where Roger doesn't get mentioned. They say its strange how Blair calls Nancy striking "like the polish workers" and think thats a more Molly esq comment. They think it makes more sense if it was meant for Jo to say it.

It definitely doesn't seem like a Blair joke; Britt is right about it being a Molly line.

Dominik also mentions the fact that Nancy's final episode is in Season 8, and Britt is shocked. Dominik doesn't remember anything about the Nancy-Roger relationship, other than Nancy mentions Roger in TLC.

...And your comment was called out in this week's podcast, at about 49 minutes in. Congrats, Lorimar!

Was it mine or yours? :lol:;)

Was it mine or yours? :lol:;)

YOU were the one who mentioned Tootie steaming open the envelopes! :lol:

Haha cuz you said this They also mentioned Nancy as well as Roger's penis. :eek:

Haha cuz you said this

Okay, then we share the shout-out! :wave:

Pretty Babiea isn’t my favorite episode but the podcast mad me laugh, especially the point about Mrs. Garret knocking into the chair.

I think Dom watched the episodes on dailymotion. I hope he knows after a certain point the episodes are the syndicated versions. I think it’s like Season 5 or 6.

Pretty Babiea isn’t my favorite episode but the podcast mad me laugh, especially the point about Mrs. Garret knocking into the chair.

I think Dom watched the episodes on dailymotion. I hope he knows after a certain point the episodes are the syndicated versions. I think it’s like Season 5 or 6.

Yeah season 7-9 is syndicated versions. I liked Pretty Babies mostly for Nancy appearing.

Pretty Babiea isn’t my favorite episode but the podcast mad me laugh, especially the point about Mrs. Garret knocking into the chair.

I think Dom watched the episodes on dailymotion. I hope he knows after a certain point the episodes are the syndicated versions. I think it’s like Season 5 or 6.

Good point about the DM episodes being the syndicated versions in later seasons.

FOF often makes me laugh, I just wish they'd show a little more respect at times.

LOL they mention Tootie taking a picture of Jo and Blair shaking hands and says she named it "Buddies Forever 2" which got a big laugh from the others. Im surprised they remembered.

OMG---WE didn't even think of that!! :eek: :lol:

(except they were obviously never "Buddies Forever" in the organic sense of Cindy and Sue Ann)

They wonder if this was the only scene with Nancy where Roger doesn't get mentioned.

Um, obviously, no. Episodes 1-5, anyone? The adoption project class? Molly's divorce? The Group? Indeed, there are entire Roger-era episodes that don't even get a Roger mention.


They say its strange how Blair calls Nancy striking "like the polish workers" and think thats a more Molly esq comment. They think it makes more sense if it was meant for Jo to say it.

Yes that's an extremely dated, then-specific reference, BUT, points to them for bringing up Molly! :D

Oh, Britt. How can you confuse The Addams Family and The Munsters? "Cousin Eddie"? :lol:

What?? :rofl:

Good Lord, no wonder they have trouble keeping the Julies distinct! :lol:

...And your comment was called out in this week's podcast, at about 49 minutes in. Congrats, Lorimar!

WHOA! Now Lorsie's "Facts"-famous too! :lol:

It definitely doesn't seem like a Blair joke; Britt is right about it being a Molly line.

Maybe they wanted to show that, despite Blair's vanity and self-indulgence, she is intelligent and does pay attention to current events? She does keep tabs on financial news, maybe that was related? :lol:

Dominik also mentions the fact that Nancy's final episode is in Season 8, and Britt is shocked. Dominik doesn't remember anything about the Nancy-Roger relationship, other than Nancy mentions Roger in TLC.

Um, the fact that she's marrying Roger and is "baking Roger's bread in her bun warmer"? :lol:

YOU were the one who mentioned Tootie steaming open the envelopes! :lol:

Haha cuz you said this - Originally Posted by RetroGuy2000
They also mentioned Nancy as well as Roger's penis.

:rofl:

Yeah season 7-9 is syndicated versions. I liked Pretty Babies mostly for Nancy appearing.

I liked it because it's a good episode :wave:

I can't believe they didn't mention Molly being the photographer of the girls when Tootie had her camera and all (assuming they didn't mention it, since you guys didn't bring it up).

What?? :rofl:

Good Lord, no wonder they have trouble keeping the Julie's distinct! :lol:

I was in shock. How can you be a Classic TV podcast reviewer and not even know the difference between The Munsters and the Addams Family? Sure, Britt's reviewing an '80s sitcom, but those shows were still being shown in the 1980s, and The Munsters Today aired in the 1980s as well.

I mean, sure, part of the fun of the podcast is Britt being a "FOL virgin", but it just makes me wonder what she was actually watching on TV in the '80s, if she never saw FOL (probably the longest-running sitcom of the 1980s), and doesn't know the characters in The Addams Family or The Munsters.

(And FOF Podcast folks, if you see this, I'd genuinely love that answer!)

And I still don't know how they can confuse Julie Pie and Julie Anne. Julie Anne and Cousin Itt, maybe. ;)

https://i1.wp.com/www.trenchcoatsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/fol10-e1534261523491.jpg

OMG---WE didn't even think of that!! :eek: :lol:

(except they were obviously never "Buddies Forever" in the organic sense of Cindy and Sue Ann)

Haha yeah they did good there

I was in shock. How can you be a Classic TV podcast reviewer and not even know the difference between The Munsters and the Addams Family? Sure, Britt's reviewing an '80s sitcom, but those shows were still being shown in the 1980s, and The Munsters Today aired in the 1980s as well.

I mean, sure, part of the fun of the podcast is Britt being a "FOL virgin", but it just makes me wonder what she was actually watching on TV in the '80s, if she never saw FOL (probably the longest-running sitcom of the 1980s), and doesn't know the characters in The Addams Family or The Munsters.

(And FOF Podcast folks, if you see this, I'd genuinely love that answer!)

And I still don't know how they can confuse Julie Pie and Julie Anne. Julie Anne and Cousin Itt, maybe. ;)

https://i1.wp.com/www.trenchcoatsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/fol10-e1534261523491.jpg
:brent

Britt and Dom put up their episode about “Bought and Sold” yesterday. Lots of funny moments. They do question why the girl we’re going to Debbie’s sleepover and not Nancy’s.

Britt and Dom put up their episode about “Bought and Sold” yesterday. Lots of funny moments. They do question why the girl we’re going to Debbie’s sleepover and not Nancy’s.

Haha glad to hear they made a lost girl ref!

Britt and Dom put up their episode about “Bought and Sold” yesterday. Lots of funny moments. They do question why the girl we’re going to Debbie’s sleepover and not Nancy’s.

Haha! That was a good line. :lol:

Another good Lost Girls line is when Dominick says, "Willis comes into the girls' room! Not even Cindy or Sue Ann are allowed in the girls' room!"

The Gollum impression "Feeeetsies!" was pretty hilarious, too.

Haha! That was a good line. :lol:

Another good Lost Girls line is when Dominick says, "Willis comes into the girls' room! Not even Cindy or Sue Ann are allowed in the girls' room!"

The Gollum impression "Feeeetsies!" was pretty hilarious, too.

:lol: He has a point. Molly wasn’t either.

:lol: He has a point. Molly wasn’t either.
Well, that's because Molly was hanging around that no-good Margo from Fargo.

Well, that's because Molly was hanging around that no-good Margo from Fargo.

Haha possibly, I like to think she was over her entitled attitude pretty quickly and stopped hanging around her.

Yeah, I think Margo was Fargo(ne) [lol] after "that pie bit".

Yeah, I think Margo was Fargo(ne) [lol] after "that pie bit".

I'd like to think so, but if so, who was Molly hanging around? It certainly wasn't Cindy, Nancy, or Sue Ann, who appear in eight episodes, but never with Molly. And it wasn't Tootie, Natalie, Blair, or Jo, either. Heck, it wasn't even Alex, Terry, Brenda, Miko, Emily, or Jenny, who appear in about a dozen episodes, all without Molly.

It's like Molly decides to never been seen again in the cafeteria, after Margo's pieing.

I'd like to think so, but if so, who was Molly hanging around? It certainly wasn't Cindy, Nancy, or Sue Ann, who appear in eight episodes, but never with Molly. And it wasn't Tootie, Natalie, Blair, or Jo, either. Heck, it wasn't even Alex, Terry, Brenda, Miko, Emily, or Jenny, who appear in about a dozen episodes, all without Molly.

It's like Molly decides to never been seen again in the cafeteria, after Margo's pieing.

Uh-oh, it's ol' Melancholy Retro again ;)

No, it's not like that all. You see, Molly does hang around them, and regularly visits the cafeteria (certainly daily for lunch). It's just that the camera never captures her there. :)

Now if Molly hadn't appeared around her friends in 50 episodes, I'd say that could be likely, but just a handful of episodes for Lost Girls easily explains Molly's absence by just saying she happened to not be with that girl or those girls those limited # of times.

For instance, "Gossip": Maybe Molly took a stand against mail fraud felony and took up the reins of "Mail Mistress", seeing each and every envelope was picked up only by the addressee! :lol: Natalie, Sue Ann, and Cindy could have gotten their mail from their pal Mols before coming back to the cafeteria in their separate re-entries. :)

Uh-oh, it's ol' Melancholy Retro again ;)

No, it's not like that all. You see, Molly does hang around them, and regularly visits the cafeteria (certainly daily for lunch). It's just that the camera never captures her there. :)

Now if Molly hadn't appeared around her friends in 50 episodes, I'd say that could be likely, but just a handful of episodes for Lost Girls easily explains Molly's absence by just saying she happened to not be with that girl or those girls those limited # of times.

For instance, "Gossip": Maybe Molly took a stand against mail fraud felony and took up the reins of "Mail Mistress", seeing each and every envelope was picked up only by the addressee! :lol: Natalie, Sue Ann, and Cindy could have gotten their mail from their pal Mols before coming back to the cafeteria in their separate re-entries. :)

Haha great points. And I’m sure molly didn’t pay any attention to the gossip about Natalie. A woman can be as sexual as a man anyway. No way she would audition for that photographer either, no man will judge her worth!

A woman can be as sexual as a man anyway.

Just ask Blanche Devereaux! (that's "dev-uh-roh"---it's only pronounced "dev-uh-rox" in limericks! :lol:)


No way she would audition for that photographer either, no man will judge her worth!

"Pose for Jonathan Dutton? Are you kidding?? No scrawny nerfbag's gonna judge me on my cleavage!"

You tell 'em, Mols! :lol: :rock:

Just ask Blanche Devereaux! (that's "dev-uh-roh"---it's only pronounced "dev-uh-rox" in limericks! :lol:)




"Pose for Jonathan Dutton? Are you kidding?? No scrawny nerfbag's gonna judge me on my cleavage!"

You tell 'em, Mols! :lol: :rock:

:lol:

Dom and Britt return for “Free Spirit “. It’s pretty funny, they have a great guest, Nancy is mentioned somewhere around the 39 minute mark - I forget why. Dom gave a subtle warning to Britt about “Brian and Sylvia”, which, if you feel the way I do, is the Golden Girls Empty Nest episode of FOL.

Dom and Britt return for “Free Spirit “. It’s pretty funny, they have a great guest, Nancy is mentioned somewhere around the 39 minute mark - I forget why. Dom gave a subtle warning to Britt about “Brian and Sylvia”, which, if you feel the way I do, is the Golden Girls Empty Nest episode of FOL.

Tootie had a Donna Summers outfit and they asked why she didn't see Nancy about it. They also claim we never know her last name which is false.

Oh right, Tootie asked about Donna Summers’ clothes and they said she should have just asked Nancy, lol.

Oh right, Tootie asked about Donna Summers’ clothes and they said she should have just asked Nancy, lol.

They also mentioned that there had been seven girls there, including Molly Ringwald, and said that the school was starting to feel very empty. Dominik mentions the grapefruit, and how Natalie only prepares six halves... for the whole school! :lol: But there's only one half for each character in the episode, including Alex.

Dom, Britt and Peter return today to report on “Brian and Sylvia”. You take the good, you the bad...

What are other peoples’ thoughts on this episode? I’ve plain old never liked it.

I never liked backdoor pilot episodes, except the DS episode for FOL.

I like Big Apple Blues, as I’ve stated lol and The Academy.

Dom, Britt and Peter return today to report on “Brian and Sylvia”. You take the good, you the bad...

What are other peoples’ thoughts on this episode? I’ve plain old never liked it.

I actually like B&S. Part of is nostalgia, for I vividly remember watching it at my grandparents'. But Tootie and Natalie are there throughout the episode, so I like how they keep some of the girls around for it. I like BAB too for the '80s-New-Yorkness of it, and the "Fame" feel. My least favorite is "The Big Fight".

Just so you guys know, the podcast is back with Season 3! Check it out!

Checked out the first episode, Dominik! Keep 'em coming. And congrats on reaching #14 in South Korea, in the TV category!

Thanks for being a "Sue Ann-positive" podcast, Dominik! I won't send a letter of complaint.

Nice name-drops of Molly and Sue Ann. Britt's impression of Jo continues to amuse me.

Strangely, neither FOL Superfan Dominik nor FOL Former Virgin Britt know that Blair's from Manhattan. How could you binge watch two full seasons of this show and think she's from Texas or Pennsylvania?! That's like thinking Sue Ann's from Iowa City or Nancy's from... er... umm... hmmm.

Checked out the first episode, Dominik! Keep 'em coming. And congrats on reaching #14 in South Korea, in the TV category!

Thanks for being a "Sue Ann-positive" podcast, Dominik! I won't send a letter of complaint.

They like her now??


Nice name-drops of Molly and Sue Ann.

Oo, oo, what'd they say, what'd they say?? (why mention Molly and Sue Ann but not Cindy nor Nancy??)


Strangely, neither FOL Superfan Dominik nor FOL Former Virgin Brett know that Blair's from Manhattan. How could you binge watch two full seasons of this show and think she's from Texas or Pennsylvania?! That's like thinking Sue Ann's from Iowa City or Nancy's from... er... umm... hmmm.

They don't know she's from NEW YORK??? :rotflmao:

Where the h-e-double-Cindy's-hockey-sticks do they get "Texas" and "Pennsylvania"???*

*(excepting the moment in the first episode when Lisa says, "That's just tahlk.")

Wow Brit's been working on her Nat! Her impressions are really making this podcast!
They like her now??
Yes, I guess our complaints got through. Don't underestimate the Sue Ann fanbase ;)

Oo, oo, what'd they say, what'd they say?? (why mention Molly and Sue Ann but not Cindy nor Nancy??)
Just that they figured when they were having a party that maybe the lost girls would be there.

They don't know she's from NEW YORK??? :rotflmao:

Where the h-e-double-Cindy's-hockey-sticks do they get "Texas" and "Pennsylvania"???*

*(excepting the moment in the first episode when Lisa says, "That's just tahlk.")
Dominick said he prob confused Lisa for Blair, and she was also wearing cowboy boots in this episode. :lol:

Yes, I guess our complaints got through. Don't underestimate the Sue Ann fanbase ;)

Hahaha! Underestimation noted! :p


Just that they figured when they were having a party that maybe the lost girls would be there.

Oh, okay. Wait, but there are only TWO more Lost Girls, and they couldn't mention them?? Two people doing this podcast?? And Nancy would have been so easy to bring up, like, "Nancy probably wouldn't go to the drinking party in the basement because she's stuck on the phone with Roger!" lol


Dominick said he prob confused Lisa for Blair, and she was also wearing cowboy boots in this episode. :lol:

Hmm, but STILL...like Retro said, they watched TWO SEASONS of this show---concentrate, people! lol

Oh, okay. Wait, but there are only TWO more Lost Girls, and they couldn't mention them?? Two people doing this podcast?? And Nancy would have been so easy to bring up, like, "Nancy probably wouldn't go to the drinking party in the basement because she's stuck on the phone with Roger!" lol

Haha! That would have been nice.

But instead, they mentioned that they could have used Molly in a scene where the dinner is going to be held... but since no dinner is actually held...

And they mentioned that they're now a Sue Ann-positive podcast, or Dominik will get letters...

They haven't mentioned Cindy since last year, when Britt said she was "so over Cindy". Pretty sure they'll have to mention Cindy at least once, considering Front Page is coming up. And Nancy will get her Contractually Obligated Three Episodes™, so they're bound to mention her as well. I doubt we'll get much Lost Girls love between seasons four and seven, though...


Hmm, but STILL...like Retro said, they watched TWO SEASONS of this show---concentrate, people! lol

:lol:
There's so much discussion of dildos, french ticklers, condoms, etc., that I think they sometimes forget they're reviewing a classic TV show. (BTW, the last podcast discussed all of those things).

Wow Brit's been working on her Nat! Her impressions are really making this podcast!

Gotta say I agree. Her Natalie is pretty spot-on... though one time it started off as "Natalie" and morphed into "Mrs. Garrett with dilated eyes". :lol:


Yes, I guess our complaints got through. Don't underestimate the Sue Ann fanbase ;)

:cheers:


Dominick said he prob confused Lisa for Blair, and she was also wearing cowboy boots in this episode. :lol:

Blair and Lisa do look the same, but they have very different backgrounds...

I can’t help but lol during this podcast...!

Gotta say I agree. Her Natalie is pretty spot-on... though one time it started off as "Natalie" and morphed into "Mrs. Garrett with dilated eyes". :lol:



:uplol: Definitely

I can’t help but lol during this podcast...!

I know what you mean! It's kinda like recaps on crack! :lol:

:uplol: Definitely

Aside from the Natalie impressions, Lorimar, what was your favorite part of the podcast?

But instead, they mentioned that they could have used Molly in a scene where the dinner is going to be held... but since no dinner is actually held...\

What?? What dinner?? Why would they mention Molly as apropos for a dinner scene??


and they mentioned that they're now a Sue Ann-positive podcast, or Dominik will get letters...

haha!


I doubt we'll get much Lost Girls love between seasons four and seven, though...

Podcast ratings are gonna drop big time if the Lost Girls fans stop listening, lol.


Aside from the Natalie impressions, Lorimar, what was your favorite part of the podcast?

Are you kidding? You know the Sue Ann mention was his fav'rite part! :lol:


Blair and Lisa do look the same, but they have very different backgrounds...

Ahhhh,hahahahaha! :rotflmao:

\

What?? What dinner?? Why would they mention Molly as apropos for a dinner scene??



I think they thought Mrs. Garrett was preparing for a big dinner by asking for a bun warmer and a new rotisserie. But no dinner was actually held. If a big dinner had taken place, then Molly and other guests could have been there.


Are you kidding? You know the Sue Ann mention was his fav'rite part! :lol:


You could be right! :lol:

I think they thought Mrs. Garrett was preparing for a big dinner by asking for a bun warmer and a new rotisserie. But no dinner was actually held. If a big dinner had taken place, then Molly and other guests could have been there.

Hmmmm, methinks this alleged "dinner" is a podcast red herring! Why would there need to be a big dinner?? She prepares meals "for hundreds of girls" every day! (or "thousands", by Warren's estimations! :lol: )

Are you kidding? You know the Sue Ann mention was his fav'rite part! :lol:




LOL! You know me well, bud! :D The impressions are good too though

Hmmmm, methinks this alleged "dinner" is a podcast red herring! Why would there need to be a big dinner?? She prepares meals "for hundreds of girls" every day! (or "thousands", by Warren's estimations! :lol: )

I was just glad they were discussing the actual show. 75% of the content of their podcasts have been dick jokes or calling Tootie psychopathic, insinuating Jo's a lesbian, dissing Sue Ann, or calling attention to the fact that Mrs. Garrett mentions her own butt often (they're not wrong, there). In comparison, this felt actually topical. :lol:

I gotta admit, the Natalie/Jo/Garrett impressions are pretty funny.

I was just glad they were discussing the actual show. 75% of the content of their podcasts have been dick jokes or calling Tootie psychopathic, insinuating Jo's a lesbian, dissing Sue Ann, or calling attention to the fact that Mrs. Garrett mentions her own butt often (they're not wrong, there). In comparison, this felt actually topical. :lol:

I believe after season 1, Mrs. Garrett never again mentions her rump (since it is no longer as rotund as it once was).

I think Dom and Britt are hitting a stride. Britt even seems to be warming up the show. That must have to do with the FOL episodes. Season 3 is pretty crazy when you step back and look - Tootie drinking, the prostitution episode, the Jermaine Jackson “bomb”. There’s more to lampoon.

I think Dom and Britt are hitting a stride. Britt even seems to be warming up the show. That must have to do with the FOL episodes. Season 3 is pretty crazy when you step back and look - Tootie drinking, the prostitution episode, the Jermaine Jackson “bomb”. There’s more to lampoon.

They definitely find plenty to lampoon. Britt did say she's enjoying Season Three more, but I really wonder why. She thinks Tootie's a sociopath, and spends a good part of her time doing Natalie and Mrs. G impressions.

Anyway, I enjoy the show when they're not beating up on the girls too much.

Enjoyed episode 3-03 of the podcast; they mention the Lost Girls again, including Molly, and then Dominik mentions something we've discussed: Why didn't they have Nancy be the mother in this episode, instead of a random character no-one's ever heard of. (They also mention Roger and the Donna Summer records). Funny episode!

Enjoyed episode 3-03 of the podcast; they mention the Lost Girls again, including Molly, and then Dominik mentions something we've discussed: Why didn't they have Nancy be the mother in this episode, instead of a random character no-one's ever heard of. (They also mention Roger and the Donna Summer records). Funny episode!

Thats awesome and very true, but we did see Nancy in season 2 clearly not pregnant. :lol:

She thinks Tootie's a sociopath

Why? That's only supposed their impression of season 1 Tootie, lol.


they mention the Lost Girls again, including Molly

Context, please! :)

(I can't believe they keep mentioning Molly! This is great, but my Cindy needs some shout-out love too!)

(I can't believe they keep mentioning Molly! This is great, but my Cindy needs some shout-out love too!)

Well im sure they will in Front Page ;)

Well im sure they will in Front Page ;)

But she should be mentioned when she's not there---when she would be good for a story, how her parents are divorced also, how she shares characteristics with Jo, how there could be athlete stories if she were around, etc.

In "Front Page" they probably won't even remember her name or who she was! lol

Thats awesome and very true, but we did see Nancy in season 2 clearly not pregnant. :lol:

Maybe she was pregnant and just not showing yet. If Nancy had been three months pregnant during "Pretty Babies" in March 1981, she would have given birth around September, which would have made the baby a few months old in November, when "A Baby in the House" was taped. Could have worked perfectly. They just would have needed to change the line "I don't get to see a lot of movies these days" to "I don't get to go to a lot of Donna Summer concerts these days."

Then it would have made sense for The Girls to gather around their friend Nancy, reminiscing about Old Times they never actually had with Allison. The story would have had more impact with a girl we knew, rather than with a girl we'd never seen before, and would never see/hear about ever again.

Then again, I'm glad Nancy appeared in the S3 episodes she appeared in, so maybe it was a blessing in disguise that we didn't see her here.

Context, please! :)


They explained to their guest host that the cast used to be Much, Much Larger™, with Molly Ringwald and some other Lost Girls.


(I can't believe they keep mentioning Molly! This is great, but my Cindy needs some shout-out love too!)

There are entire episodes that revolve more around sex jokes than discussing the actual show. I mean, it's kinda like expecting this podcast to be... something it's not. But never fear! In just two more episodes, we'll get some sweet, sweet Cindy discussion, even though Brit is "so over Cindy".

Maybe she was pregnant and just not showing yet. If Nancy had been three months pregnant during "Pretty Babies" in March 1981, she would have given birth around September, which would have made the baby a few months old in November, when "A Baby in the House" was taped. Could have worked perfectly. They just would have needed to change the line "I don't get to see a lot of movies these days" to "I don't get to go to a lot of Donna Summer concerts these days."

Then it would have made sense for The Girls to gather around their friend Nancy, reminiscing about Old Times they never actually had with Allison. The story would have had more impact with a girl we knew, rather than with a girl we'd never seen before, and would never see/hear about ever again.

Then again, I'm glad Nancy appeared in the S3 episodes she appeared in, so maybe it was a blessing in disguise that we didn't see her here.

Since first thinking about this years ago, I've always felt the same way: would have resonated SO much more with Nancy in this role, who would have been the PERFECT choice for it. BUT, then that would have been the end of Nancy! I would rather sacrifice that and have Nancy still be a part of the rest of the series as she is* than lose her to a teen pregnancy.

*(granted we don't see her often at all after that, but at least you still sense she's there at Eastland until "Graduation")


But never fear! In just two more episodes, we'll get some sweet, sweet Cindy discussion, even though Brit is "so over Cindy".

Oh yeah?? Well then I'm "so over 'Brit'!" :mad: :lol:

But really, I'll be impressed if they do anything beyond simply just mention that that's Cindy at the table.

Since first thinking about this years ago, I've always felt the same way: would have resonated SO much more with Nancy in this role, who would have been the PERFECT choice for it. BUT, then that would have been the end of Nancy! I would rather sacrifice that and have Nancy still be a part of the rest of the series as she is* than lose her to a teen pregnancy.

*(granted we don't see her often at all after that, but at least you still sense she's there at Eastland until "Graduation")

Well stated. So it seems we agree on this point. It would have been a cool role for Nancy, but it would have ended Nancy's presence on the show earlier than what we saw.


Oh yeah?? Well then I'm "so over 'Brit'!" :mad: :lol:

But really, I'll be impressed if they do anything beyond simply just mention that that's Cindy at the table.

I think it's likely they'll mention "the lesbian". (I know, I know).

Oo, look, when I reimagined the whole series with all 8 girls, I made Nina the teen pregnancy so Nancy could stick around. :lol:

"A Baby in the House" - Former Eastland student Nina visits Blair and the girls. She was a model student with a "perfect" life but is now a teenage mother. When she leaves, she forgets her baby Emily and the girls have to take care of her.

Oo, look, when I reimagined the whole series with all 8 girls, I made Nina the teen pregnancy so Nancy could stick around. :lol:

"A Baby in the House" - Former Eastland student Nina visits Blair and the girls. She was a model student with a "perfect" life but is now a teenage mother. When she leaves, she forgets her baby Emily and the girls have to take care of her.

:lol:

At least we'd heard of Nina before. That would have been much better, though very subtle, continuity. I mean, they could have done Blairy-pie and Nina-kins just as easily as Blairy-pie and Allie-kins.

You know what they could have done, too? Home Run Helen. Sure, she and the girls were never friends, but they were still classmates, and they knew her. A few changed lines could have allowed us to see what happens to girls who sleep around like HRH. Would have been nice continuity.

But having Nina be the teen mother is indeed both subtle and clever. It would explain why she suddenly disappears. And we've even met her father.

Homerun Helen, thats an interesting thought. But it doesn't seem like the core four liked her much either. Natalie didnt act like she interacted with her before that.

Homerun Helen, thats an interesting thought. But it doesn't seem like the core four liked her much either. Natalie didnt act like she interacted with her before that.

Yeah, it's true they weren't friends. They would have needed to change some lines here and there. But a better fit than Allison, who we'd never even seen before, and never would again.

Yeah, it's true they weren't friends. They would have needed to change some lines here and there. But a better fit than Allison, who we'd never even seen before, and never would again.
Yeah good point

Does nobody really like Allison? I think the actress did a great job. I always just picture her in the other half of Season 1 episodes that never happened.

Does nobody really like Allison? I think the actress did a great job. I always just picture her in the other half of Season 1 episodes that never happened.

I think the actress did a fine job. But from a continuity perspective, this episode wasn't good: it introduced us to a character we've been told was there before, even though we know she was not. And then, after the episode, we never hear of her again, as if she never existed. Which she did not, beyond this sole episode.

This type of one-shot character (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OneShotCharacter) is a problem because it requires the viewer to suspend his/her disbelief about ever having seen the character before. We're supposed to imagine that we've previously seen her, ignoring our own memories of previous seasons. Because we had previously even seen other girls who would have been a good fit for this role, it feels lazy to cast an actress in the role of a character who had supposedly attended Eastland, during an era we know she did not.

Not only do we see a lack of continuity for this random character who doesn't belong at Eastland, we lack continuity for characters who would have otherwise better fit this role: characters we'd previously seen before, at Eastland. It's a double-continuity whammy.

You know what they could have done, too? Home Run Helen. Sure, she and the girls were never friends, but they were still classmates, and they knew her. A few changed lines could have allowed us to see what happens to girls who sleep around like HRH. Would have been nice continuity.

Hmmm, true! Though like you guys mentioned, that would be some tricky writing since they didn't seem to regard HRH with much favor.

And no Sitcommania, no problems at all with the Heather Kerr who portrayed Allison (and also brilliantly portrayed teenage Eunice in a flashback episode of "Mama's Family"). She was just fine. It's just odd being in "old home week" with our girls and their good friend whom we never saw in the whole first season. (that's a clever device though of picturing her in "non-aired" episodes---maybe we can even picture her in all 13 episodes, but in other rooms for every scene! :lol: )


But having Nina be the teen mother is indeed both subtle and clever. It would explain why she suddenly disappears. And we've even met her father.

Good ol' "frisky" Justin Branch! :lol: ;)

Hmmm, true! Though like you guys mentioned, that would be some tricky writing since they didn't seem to regard HRH with much favor.

Yeah, more tricky, for sure, but still possible. Just change a few lines from "We were best buds" (paraphrased) to "we were classmates".

It's just odd being in "old home week" with our girls and their good friend whom we never saw in the whole first season. (that's a clever device though of picturing her in "non-aired" episodes---maybe we can even picture her in all 13 episodes, but in other rooms for every scene! :lol: )

:lol:

"Where's Allison?"

"Oh, she's with Nina at the Library."

Next episode: "Where's Allison now?"

"Oh, she's with Molly over in the basement of Dorm B."

Next episode: "Where's Allison this time?"

"Oh, she and Roger went to see Baryshnikov."

[Off-screen] "She did WHAT?!"



Good ol' "frisky" Justin Branch! :lol: ;)

:lol:

Dom and Britt return Wednesday!

"Oh, she and Roger went to see Baryshnikov."

[Off-screen] "She did WHAT?!"




:eek:

“A Friend In Deed” posted today. D&B are planning to do an episode about the Lifetime Christmas movie. Can’t wait!

I'd listen to the FOF podcast on the upcoming Christmas special!

They mention Julie Pie's announcement of the upcoming documentary, and the Julie/Geri social media posts.

I LOVED Dominik's line about Tootie's gossipy nature: "Thanks to Tootie, even Miss Mahoney knows about Blair's mom's cancer, even though we haven't seen her on the show for two years!" :lol:

That was funny!

Already FOF Podcast have released a little teaser for the "Front Page" upcoming podcast, with images of Roy talking about Mr. Gideon. And a little momento to Sue Ann and Cindy, in their last appearances until Season 8 (after this, Nancy will be the last Lost Girl left, leaving later, lamentably):

Haha glad to see some lost girl fans on facebook. I'm guessing Brit didn't care about it being their last episode for a while. LOL

Britt’s about to be introduced to Roy? There’s gonna be troooouuubbbllleeee!

Britt’s about to be introduced to Roy? There’s gonna be troooouuubbbllleeee!

So true!
:brent

Haha glad to see some lost girl fans on facebook. I'm guessing Brit didn't care about it being their last episode for a while. LOL

I suspect you are right.

And I enjoy seeing Lost Girls love over on FB, too.

So true!
:brent

:lol:

Its finally out!

Its finally out!
Thanks, Lorimar!

It's a pity we lost the first part of this podcast. Bummer! As someone who has lost A/V footage, I feel Dominik's pain. He sounded so depressed!

Thanks, Lorimar!

It's a pity we lost the first part of this podcast. Bummer! As someone who has lost A/V footage, I feel Dominik's pain. He sounded so depressed!

Haha yeah, it doesn't sound like too much was lost atleast.

Their reactions to F.A.C.T. is pretty funny.

Cindy's sidling up to Jo during the cafeteria scene is more food for "lesbian" fodder in the FOF podcast, of course.

Dominik mentions how Sue Ann's Monday morning quarterbacking is irritating.

Haha yeah, it doesn't sound like too much was lost atleast.

Yeah, seemed like just a few minutes.

"Front Page" is perhaps my favorite episode of FOL, so it was kinda nice to get others' opinions, even if Britt, ???, and ??? didn't like it.

Dominik’s somber intro made me laugh, but my heart goes out to him! I thought something even worse had happened!

The guests were Britt’s husband, and Cousin Geri correspondent, Peter and Josh, someone who works on the same show as Dominik, which I believe is Alex and Katie on Netflix.

The guys loved Roy; Britt, of course, hated him.

Haha yeah, it doesn't sound like too much was lost atleast.

Something you don't say when you watch the FOL's season 2 premiere episode. ;)


Cindy's sidling up to Jo during the cafeteria scene is more food for "lesbian" fodder in the FOF podcast, of course.

Omg, why? Talk about reaching for things. :rolleyes:


Dominik mentions how Sue Ann's Monday morning quarterbacking is irritating.

"Monday morning quarterbacking"?


"Front Page" is perhaps my favorite episode of FOL

Interesting...

Dominik’s somber intro made me laugh, but my heart goes out to him! I thought something even worse had happened!

It did sound that way. At first, I wondered if he was making the sad announcement that Britt had had enough, and had decided to end her agony... and her MST3K experience. :lol:


The guests were Britt’s husband, and Cousin Geri correspondent, Peter and Josh, someone who works on the same show as Dominik, which I believe is Alex and Katie on Netflix.

Yeah, I couldn't remember the names. Thanks.


The guys loved Roy; Britt, of course, hated him.

Britt hates everything on the show. I seriously don't know how she's going to make it through another, like, 200 episodes. :lol:

"Monday morning quarterbacking"?


Sue Ann says she doesn't know if she could have written/published the story, knowing that Mr. Gideon was a teacher and all.

Something you don't say when you watch the FOL's season 2 premiere episode. ;)

Sadly no :(




Omg, why? Talk about reaching for things. :rolleyes:


They say that’s the only storyline Cindy has, besides her braids. Guess they forgot about Running. Atleast they have something to remember Cindy by, even though they reach for tiny things for Nancy like Donna Summers. :lol:

Sue Ann says she doesn't know if she could have written/published the story, knowing that Mr. Gideon was a teacher and all.

I'm still confused. "Monday morning 'quarterbacking'?" :confused:

They say that’s the only storyline Cindy has, besides her braids. Guess they forgot about Running. Atleast they have something to remember Cindy by, even though they reach for tiny things for Nancy like Donna Summers. :lol:

lol, omg...

HEY YOU PODCAST PEOPLE!! CINDY HAD ANOTHER EPISODE!! THE RUNNING ONE!!

There, lol.

I'm still confused. "Monday morning 'quarterbacking'?" :confused:

It means questioning the decisions of others after the fact (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/monday-morning-quarterback). Dominik felt that, by Sue Ann saying she didn't know if she'd have the chutzpah to write such a story, she was, in some way, questioning Natalie and Jo's decision to run the story.

We won't see Sue Ann or Cindy again for five years, so to me, this episode is very special: the last glimpse of two of the earliest characters on the show... until a reunion five years later. This episode will always have a special place in my heart.

It means questioning the decisions of others after the fact (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/monday-morning-quarterback). Dominik felt that, by Sue Ann saying she didn't know if she'd have the chutzpah to write such a story, she was, in some way, questioning Natalie and Jo's decision to run the story.

Oh, so that's what "Monday morning quarterbacking" is.

Yeah, when she says that line it's like, ouch, you just called Jo an idiot for doing that story, lol.

We won't see Sue Ann or Cindy again for five years

Actually, after this point we never see them on screen again as we know them. When they make their one return later, they're not the same Sue Ann and Cindy, so this is the last time we see "vintage"/"organic" Sue Ann and Cindy.

However, I always see them around the campus in the rest of seasons 3 and 4 with my heart. :heart:

Actually, after this point we never see them on screen again as we know them. When they make their one return later, they're not the same Sue Ann and Cindy, so this is the last time we see "vintage"/"organic" Sue Ann and Cindy.

However, I always see them around the campus in the rest of seasons 3 and 4 with my heart. :heart:

Yes. And Cindys there for s5 too ;)

Yes. And Cindys there for s5 too ;)

This is true, even though the setting is away from Eastland (but not too far away), I still feel Cindy and Molly over at Eastland during the Edna's Edibles years. :heart:

Actually, after this point we never see them on screen again as we know them. When they make their one return later, they're not the same Sue Ann and Cindy, so this is the last time we see "vintage"/"organic" Sue Ann and Cindy.

However, I always see them around the campus in the rest of seasons 3 and 4 with my heart. :heart:

I see what you mean, but we still see references to Cindy being a former tomboy, Sue Ann being expected to be successful, Nancy referencing Roger, and even a reference to Molly, so I feel like TLC is, in some ways, more true to their characters than even Seasons 2 and 3, where half of the Lost Girls aren't even mentioned by name, over the course of two seasons.

Yes. And Cindys there for s5 too ;)

what with Molly repeatedly calling Eastland a "dump", I really wonder if she stuck around beyond what must have been her Freshman year at Eastland. It's cool, though, that we got to see her there for one full year (1979-1980) and two partial years (1978-1979 and 1980-1981).

I see what you mean, but we still see references to Cindy being a former tomboy, Sue Ann being expected to be successful, Nancy referencing Roger, and even a reference to Molly, so I feel like TLC is, in some ways, more true to their characters than even Seasons 2 and 3, where half of the Lost Girls aren't even mentioned by name, over the course of two seasons.

I agree. Sue Ann and Cindy's lines could've been anyone in s2-3 where as the reunion was clearly true to their season 1 chars.

what with Molly repeatedly calling Eastland a "dump", I really wonder if she stuck around beyond what must have been her Freshman year at Eastland. It's cool, though, that we got to see her there for one full year (1979-1980) and two partial years (1978-1979 and 1980-1981).
Good point

what with Molly repeatedly calling Eastland a "dump", I really wonder if she stuck around beyond what must have been her Freshman year at Eastland. It's cool, though, that we got to see her there for one full year (1979-1980) and two partial years (1978-1979 and 1980-1981).

Hey, what kind of fan are you, trying to kick a Lost Girl out?? :lol: She only called it a dump either 2 or 3 times, and she was a hormonal adolescent, lol. She graduated, I tell you! ;)


where as the reunion was clearly true to their season 1 chars.

Except I was disappointed they wrote Sue Ann to be faking herself through nearly the entire episode. I feel we didn't really get to see her "be Sue Ann" that much.

Hey, what kind of fan are you, trying to kick a Lost Girl out?? :lol: She only called it a dump either 2 or 3 times, and she was a hormonal adolescent, lol. She graduated, I tell you! ;)

How did she graduate while locked in the basement? :lol:


Except I was disappointed they wrote Sue Ann to be faking herself through nearly the entire episode. I feel we didn't really get to see her "be Sue Ann" that much.

Sue Ann made a mistake, and owned up to it (or tried to). She learned her lesson, and by now I'm sure she is a VP.

Sure, Sue Ann lied about flying first class to Sweden, and her big VP job, but we don't know for sure that she was lying about the Bergdorf's outfit... and she clearly was working at that big company... just not in the position she claimed. And we did get to see her hang out with Cindy (a Sue Ann trademark), we heard her ask about Mrs. Garrett (which felt like genuine Sue Ann), Tootie confirmed Sue Ann's good grades (something we remember from the old days), she acted competitively (another Sue Ann trademark), acted sarcastic towards Blair when Blair admitted she wasn't a real blonde (mirroring their old "frenemy" behavior), and we even got a flashback to Sue Ann on that horrible diet during "Dieting". And the way Sue Ann reacted to Jo's covering for her (with that grateful Midwestern look) just felt like classic (or vintage? :lol: ) Sue Ann to me.

Sure, a two-parter, where we could have seen Sue Ann talk about Kansas City, Kansas, and her dog, Tiger, and her Eastland trophies, would have been so cool... but I appreciate that the Lost Girls had a real return, not just a bit part, but fairly meaty roles which updated us on characters we hadn't seen in a very long time. It's notable that they didn't do this for any other character on the show: once a character was gone, they were gone. As in... they didn't even exist anymore.

It's notable that they didn't do this for any other character on the show: once a character was gone, they were gone. As in... they didn't even exist anymore.

Very true. Kelly, Miss Mahoney, Mr. Bradley, etc never got a second thought.

Very true. Kelly, Miss Mahoney, Mr. Bradley, etc never got a second thought.

Yep.

I believe we briefly see Mr. Bradley in a flashback in TWWW in Season 5. I don't believe we see Miss Mahoney. We certainly don't see Kevin or Kelly, or George or Howard, or Crocker, Arnold, Willis, or anyone else even in flashbacks. And yet, we see Lost Girls in not just one, not two, but three flashback episodes. And they get a reunion with updates on their lives.

If only Molly had agreed to appear; then they definitely would have made a two-parter. There would have been time for a call to Mrs. G. (by Nancy, of course), time to discuss why Cindy changed her last name, and time for a few "hayseed" jokes for Sue Ann, while still giving Molly plenty of screen time.

Sue Ann made a mistake, and owned up to it (or tried to). She learned her lesson, and by now I'm sure she is a VP.

Yup!

Regarding your thoughts, what just bothers me (or "sticks in my craw" as they'd say back in Kansas City, Kansas :lol: ) is the fact that it feels like Sue Ann is living a stressful double life in that episode, working at hiding behind a facade instead of being free and relaxed. That's what's irksome to me. I want no-worries Sue Ann, lol.

In FOF Podcast, episode 3-07, they mention that Tootie and Natalie are scraping the gum off chairs in the Eastland cafeteria, and Dominik posits that it was Cindy and Sue Ann who likely put the gum there. Britt agrees. Guess Cindy and Sue Ann chewed Juicy Fruit! :lol:

In FOF Podcast, episode 3-07, they mention that Tootie and Natalie are scraping the gum off chairs in the Eastland cafeteria, and Dominik posits that it was Cindy and Sue Ann who likely put the gum there. Britt agrees. Guess Cindy and Sue Ann chewed Juicy Fruit! :lol:

Haha

They never chewed gum!* Why would they blame them?? :lol:

*(in any episode they were in)

They never chewed gum!* Why would they blame them?? :lol:

*(in any episode they were in)

It was probably Margo and her cronies!

But Margo's only crony was... Molly!

But Margo's only crony was... Molly!

Oh, no, I don't mean Molly. I mean-post Molly, after TNG II. :)

That is, IF Margo found any cronies after her comeuppance in the cafeteria!

If season 1 had too many girls, this podcast had two many people in it. David Almeida's Face the Facts podcast is so much more entertaining and professional. Even if he is not a fan of the Lost Girls, I still enjoy their podcasts and Mrs. Garrett imitations.

The Facts of Facts podcast can't even get their facts straight. They had Sue Ann as the girl who lesbian shamed Cindy.

Wow, these guys are horrid and I just don't mean their presentation. They talk about camel toe on a 13 year old, they mock a 12 year old's speech pattern, they call a 10 year old a social path, they suggest that there is incest and abuse in Felice's family.

Haven't had much time to listen but decided to listen to Dear Me since its a lost girl ep. They say Mrs G saying "Down Nancy" should be the new "Bye Felicia". :lol: