MegtheEgg86
01-03-2014, 04:48 AM
Was thinking about this case today and found this information on the UM wiki:
In 1993, Mario's body was exhumed and a new autopsy found enough evidence to prove that he was murdered. Soon after, a police officer named Jose Antonio Verduzco Flores was arrested, convicted of his murder and sentenced to eight and a half years in prison. The conviction was overturned four months later and he was released. Mario Amado's murder remains unresolved, although many assume that Flores was the killer.
So then, I found these articles:
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-05-11/news/mn-33803_1_police-officers
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/BERMAN+SAYS+MAN+MURDERED+%3a+MEXICO+GETS+REQUEST+TO+REOPEN+JAIL+CASE.-a083933972
The second article states that inmates testified they observed Amado being beaten after he became belligerent while demanding to make a phone call (he was collared on a drunk and disorderly in the first place). This contradicts what Joe Amado claims he was told by authorities, that all the inmates were asleep at the time of Mario's death. The inmates also claimed that the officer who was eventually convicted was NOT the man that beat Amado in the cell.
So, I suppose I wonder: provided the inmates are telling the truth, was Flores framed? Was he equally as involved and culpable as this other officer? Or was he simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time, in the wrong uniform?
I do think Mario was murdered, and I am glad that Joe Amado fought as hard as he did to get his brother's death re-investigated. But if someone may have ended up being set up as a fall guy in the midst of all this, that's really not cool.
Additionally, I didn't particularly relish Joe Amado's wish to "ruin the lives" of other people (regardless of whatever they may have done). Reading through these articles, his attitude appears to have remained consistent. He is "not happy" with Flores being the only individual arrested. He is "not happy" with Flores' initial sentence. He is never happy with anything. It might be somewhat understandable, but it's tiresome and sad.
In 1993, Mario's body was exhumed and a new autopsy found enough evidence to prove that he was murdered. Soon after, a police officer named Jose Antonio Verduzco Flores was arrested, convicted of his murder and sentenced to eight and a half years in prison. The conviction was overturned four months later and he was released. Mario Amado's murder remains unresolved, although many assume that Flores was the killer.
So then, I found these articles:
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-05-11/news/mn-33803_1_police-officers
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/BERMAN+SAYS+MAN+MURDERED+%3a+MEXICO+GETS+REQUEST+TO+REOPEN+JAIL+CASE.-a083933972
The second article states that inmates testified they observed Amado being beaten after he became belligerent while demanding to make a phone call (he was collared on a drunk and disorderly in the first place). This contradicts what Joe Amado claims he was told by authorities, that all the inmates were asleep at the time of Mario's death. The inmates also claimed that the officer who was eventually convicted was NOT the man that beat Amado in the cell.
So, I suppose I wonder: provided the inmates are telling the truth, was Flores framed? Was he equally as involved and culpable as this other officer? Or was he simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time, in the wrong uniform?
I do think Mario was murdered, and I am glad that Joe Amado fought as hard as he did to get his brother's death re-investigated. But if someone may have ended up being set up as a fall guy in the midst of all this, that's really not cool.
Additionally, I didn't particularly relish Joe Amado's wish to "ruin the lives" of other people (regardless of whatever they may have done). Reading through these articles, his attitude appears to have remained consistent. He is "not happy" with Flores being the only individual arrested. He is "not happy" with Flores' initial sentence. He is never happy with anything. It might be somewhat understandable, but it's tiresome and sad.