Darrin is as hot as Shrek.
For example the thread for Dick York is gorgeous has only two pages. :lol:


well then.

goodbye losers.

Darrin is as hot as Shrek.
For example the thread for Dick York is gorgeous has only two pages. :lol:


well then.

goodbye losers.
i honestly feel sorry for your parents.

Darrin is as hot as Shrek.
For example the thread for Dick York is gorgeous has only two pages. :lol:


well then.

goodbye losers.
Hi, Fantasylove22 :lol: :wave:

You are VERY disturbed :crazy:

You make that Cameron Family stalker dude seem reasonable.

Thank you, Admins, for getting right on this.

You make that Cameron Family stalker dude seem reasonable.

They'd make a lovely couple. :lol:

They'd make a lovely couple. :lol:
Are these really adults discussing the physical merits of one actor over another? Both Dick York and Dick Sargent were talented actors who played the part of Darrin well. If I choose Mr. York's episodes over Mr. Sargent's, it's because I felt the scripts were better in the earlier seasons. The "war" going on here belongs to people of a third-grade mentality. (Maybe I shouldn't be so insulting to third-graders.)

Are these really adults discussing the physical merits of one actor over another? Both Dick York and Dick Sargent were talented actors who played the part of Darrin well. If I choose Mr. York's episodes over Mr. Sargent's, it's because I felt the scripts were better in the earlier seasons. The "war" going on here belongs to people of a third-grade mentality. (Maybe I shouldn't be so insulting to third-graders.)

This has nothing to do with which actor was the better Darrin. I'm not sure why you quoted my post but my advice to you would be that if you don't know what you're commenting on then don't comment at all. The third-grader reference might also be considered a personal attack but I'll let those in charge decide that.

I can't speak for TJ and Janice, but I think this person has it coming, Charles. If people want to come on and spam the boards repeatedly over a STUPID topic, then they can't expect the veterans of the board to turn a blind eye.

I can't speak for TJ and Janice, but I think this person has it coming, Charles. If people want to come on and spam the boards repeatedly over a STUPID topic, then they can't expect the veterans of the board to turn a blind eye.
Well said. Zoneboy repeatedly defends idiocy and threatens those that question it. I've seen more examples of this than those that concern me. How he got to be a moderator is beyond me. Don't worry ZB. You have a few defenders left. I said good-bye to this page a while back. I'm saying it again. This was a potentially good site spoiled by ignorance and political BS.

Well said. Zoneboy repeatedly defends idiocy and threatens those that question it. I've seen more examples of this than those that concern me. How he got to be a moderator is beyond me. Don't worry ZB. You have a few defenders left. I said good-bye to this page a while back. I'm saying it again. This was a potentially good site spoiled by ignorance and political BS.

Would you care to provide an example of any idiocy I've defended or any threats I've made? Like I said, you made a comment on a thread that had nothing to do with who was the better Darrin. Mods aren't perfect and as far as your bewilderment about my being one is concerned, don't question it here in an open forum. Take your gripe to an administrator and plead your case with them. The ability of a mod to perform their job is something that shouldn't be discussed in an open forum. Also, griping about my moderating won't do you a bit of good here since I'm not a mod on this forum.

Would you care to provide an example of any idiocy I've defended or any threats I've made?
What is this loon talking about? :confused: :crazy:
I've never seen you threaten anyone.

Well said. Zoneboy repeatedly defends idiocy and threatens those that question it. I've seen more examples of this than those that concern me. How he got to be a moderator is beyond me. Don't worry ZB. You have a few defenders left. I said good-bye to this page a while back. I'm saying it again. This was a potentially good site spoiled by ignorance and political BS.
What in the world are you talking about? This thread was started by a spammer who has a history of cluttering the boards. Why in the world would you came in this thread to insult a moderator and call everyone a three year old is beyond me. This wasn't even a Dick York vs Dick Sargent thread. This was someone having a temper tantrum.

Well that was certainly a weird way to start a thread but I'm glad to see that this person isn't a regular poster.

What in the world are you talking about? This thread was started by a spammer who has a history of cluttering the boards. Why in the world would you came in this thread to insult a moderator and call everyone a three year old is beyond me. This wasn't even a Dick York vs Dick Sargent thread. This was someone having a temper tantrum.
The "threats" I am referring to are on a thread I cannot locate to a poster who has since been banned. The poster had decidedly right-wing ideas and was taken to task by Zoneboy as well as Janice (the poster referred to her towards the end of the post as "fat" Janice (not my words.) This post is a spin-off of the nasty "York vs. Sargent" post, and my reference to third-grade mentality was pointed at that silly, superficial topic. The fact that I happened to answer Zoneboy's post was merely because his was the last post on the thread. He immediately began telling me to investigate what I am talking about, talking down to me as if I were a third-grader. He has a habit of jumping the gun, criticizing posters who do not agree with everything on the page. As far as Janice is concerned, when I took issue with political avatars which I still say have nothing to do with sitcoms or other TV shows, she very nicely sent me her own avatars, pushing her political beliefs in my face on a private message. As a person who does admittedly lean to the right, I think that particular message, private or not, was particularly inappropriate from a moderator. Zoneboy attacked my criticism of some grammatical mistake that I took issue with perhaps a year ago. Maybe I was wrong to do that, but look at Tubeheads posts and tell me there shouldn't be some kind of grammatical guidelines put into effect. I have had many good and meaningful conversations with a good many of you in the past, but the aggravation of putting up with all this is not worth it. I have very good discussions with people on IMDB, where I have posted more than 150 reviews. Some agreed with, some not. But the discussions are of an adult and respectful nature. Ditto for Nitrateville, where the posters seem to be of a more agreeable ilk. I shall therefore confine my comments to those pages, where topics such as this never make it to the discussion stage.

The "threats" I am referring to are on a thread I cannot locate to a poster who has since been banned.

If you can't find the appropriate thread to back up your alleged allegations then don't accuse me of making threats.

The fact that I happened to answer Zoneboy's post was merely because his was the last post on the thread.

Once again your comments had nothing to do with the topic in question. I've said twice that this thread in not about who was the better Darrin. Sonny also confirmed this in his reply. This is also not a spinoff of any Sargeant Vs York thread. If you don't know what you're replying to then you shouldn't reply at all.

He immediately began telling me to investigate what I am talking about, talking down to me as if I were a third-grader.

No such thing, you quoted my post then replied with something that had nothing to do with the thread. In my reply to you I simply stated that this had nothing to do with who was the better Darrin and that if you didn't know what you were relying to then you shouldn't reply at all. You're also the one that referred to us as third graders so don't even go there.


He has a habit of jumping the gun, criticizing posters who do not agree with everything on the page.

Provide some proof of this please, what type of criticizing are you referring to? You make it sound as if I'm not allowed to disagree with anyone here. I know that I've disagreements in the past that may have gotten out of hand but I usually try to avoid arguing and will just move on if any thread starts going in that direction.


As far as Janice is concerned, when I took issue with political avatars which I still say have nothing to do with sitcoms or other TV shows.

Your gripe was over another members use of political references in their signature which is not against any rules. If it had been they would've been removed without warning by the Administrators.

Zoneboy attacked my criticism of some grammatical mistake that I took issue with perhaps a year ago.

Your criticism was against board rules which plainly state that correcting another members grammar is not allowed.


The Maybe I was wrong to do that, but look at Tubeheads posts and tell me there shouldn't be some kind of grammatical guidelines put into effect.

If you don't have any clue as to why Tubehead's post are the way they are then don't comment or start making suggestions about grammatical guidelines. The only guideline we need is already in the rules and it states
"As long as the message is coherent enough to make it's point, that's all we ask".

If you can't find the appropriate thread to back up your alleged allegations then don't accuse me of making threats.



Once again your comments had nothing to do with the topic in question. I've said twice that this thread in not about who was the better Darrin. Sonny also confirmed this in his reply. This is also not a spinoff of any Sargeant Vs York thread. If you don't know what you're replying to then you shouldn't reply at all.



No such thing, you quoted my post then replied with something that had nothing to do with the thread. In my reply to you I simply stated that this had nothing to do with who was the better Darrin and that if you didn't know what you were relying to then you shouldn't reply at all. You're also the one that referred to us as third graders so don't even go there.




Provide some proof of this please, what type of criticizing are you referring to? You make it sound as if I'm not allowed to disagree with anyone here. I know that I've disagreements in the past that may have gotten out of hand but I usually try to avoid arguing and will just move on if any thread starts going in that direction.




Your gripe was over another members use of political references in their signature which is not against any rules. If it had been they would've been removed without warning by the Administrators.



Your criticism was against board rules which plainly state that correcting another members grammar is not allowed.




If you don't have any clue as to why Tubehead's post are the way they are then don't comment or start making suggestions about grammatical guidelines. The only guideline we need is already in the rules and it states
"As long as the message is coherent enough to make it's point, that's all we ask".
Zoneboy, I've really had it with your whining. Under one of Tubehead's posts there was an insult given him by another poster, yet no one takes him to task about that. You are a poor excuse for a professional moderator. A little like Barney Fife on The Andy Griffith Show. We're done here. Get over it.

The "threats" I am referring to are on a thread I cannot locate to a poster who has since been banned. The poster had decidedly right-wing ideas and was taken to task by Zoneboy as well as Janice (the poster referred to her towards the end of the post as "fat" Janice (not my words.) This post is a spin-off of the nasty "York vs. Sargent" post
1. The poster was a loon by the screen name of tylerjjj A.K.A. Sgt. Peppers A.K.A. That70sGuy A.K.A. 3sCompanyGuy. He had 4 different screen names because he kept getting banned.
2. He was not a right-winger. He was a bleeding heart liberal who worshiped Obama.
3. That thread is from MONTHS ago and has NOTHING to do with Bewitched.
4. Posted below is a link to that thread. The last post is from TVFactFan who quoted the lunatic rudely insulting Janice, TVFactFan (Sol) and MYSELF, so I remember the thread very well. Dick York was never an issue. Obama was.
5. You are delusional and you are a trouble maker.

http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?p=4740933

Zoneboy, I've really had it with your whining. Under one of Tubehead's posts there was an insult given him by another poster, yet no one takes him to task about that. You are a poor excuse for a professional moderator. A little like Barney Fife on The Andy Griffith Show. We're done here. Get over it.

If anyone is doing any whining it's you and as far as the post from Tubehead is concerned I have no idea which one you're talking about but if anyone does insult him you can bet that an administrator will deal with it. I also never claimed to be a professional moderator but if you think you can do any better then why don't you contact TJ and let him know you want the job. I don't mind telling you that I've just about enough of your complaining about my moderating and the problem is that you don't even post in the 3 forums I'm assigned to. I'm not a mod on the "Bewitched" forum so what I say has little effect here. Monika (Catlover79) is the mod here so take your gripe to her, Janice or TJ.

The "threats" I am referring to are on a thread I cannot locate to a poster who has since been banned. The poster had decidedly right-wing ideas and was taken to task by Zoneboy as well as Janice (the poster referred to her towards the end of the post as "fat" Janice (not my words.) This post is a spin-off of the nasty "York vs. Sargent" post, and my reference to third-grade mentality was pointed at that silly, superficial topic. The fact that I happened to answer Zoneboy's post was merely because his was the last post on the thread. He immediately began telling me to investigate what I am talking about, talking down to me as if I were a third-grader. He has a habit of jumping the gun, criticizing posters who do not agree with everything on the page. As far as Janice is concerned, when I took issue with political avatars which I still say have nothing to do with sitcoms or other TV shows, she very nicely sent me her own avatars, pushing her political beliefs in my face on a private message. As a person who does admittedly lean to the right, I think that particular message, private or not, was particularly inappropriate from a moderator. Zoneboy attacked my criticism of some grammatical mistake that I took issue with perhaps a year ago. Maybe I was wrong to do that, but look at Tubeheads posts and tell me there shouldn't be some kind of grammatical guidelines put into effect. I have had many good and meaningful conversations with a good many of you in the past, but the aggravation of putting up with all this is not worth it. I have very good discussions with people on IMDB, where I have posted more than 150 reviews. Some agreed with, some not. But the discussions are of an adult and respectful nature. Ditto for Nitrateville, where the posters seem to be of a more agreeable ilk. I shall therefore confine my comments to those pages, where topics such as this never make it to the discussion stage.
This is an out and out lie. You've been doing nothing bitching about me openly on this site. If I see another one, you're gone. I never pushed any political agenda with you. Now that I think of it, you need a week off. You'll have plenty of time to study the rules.