Brad Russ
06-24-2011, 09:44 PM
Paul Potts, or Susan Boyle? I always find it so funny how people react to Paul Potts, and Susan Boyle. Everybody acts like it's such a shock that they can be good singers, and why? What does a person being unattractive have to do with whether or not they can sing? Part of the reason that most music today is such garbage is because the criteria not only comes down to your voice, but also whether or not you look like a freaking supermodel. MTV and VH1 are the biggest reason why most of today's music absolutely sucks because that's when image became even more important then whether a person could actually sing. Just look at Justin Bieber, and my point is proven. I would ask all those people who laughed at Paul and Susan, if they also laughed at Aretha Franklin, Janis Joplin, Elton John, and Carole King the first time they heard them sing? All three of these women aren't very attractive, but all three of them were voted on VH1 to be three of the top 10 female singers of all time. Franklin coming in first, and Joplin coming in at third. I just don't get some people. Back when music was awesome in the 50's 60's, and 70's, Image didn't matter at all, because there was no MTV, or VH1. Truthfully many of the singers and groups back then were what most people consider unattractive. Anyway, I got off track there. Below are two links, one of Paul Potts, and another of Susan Boyle. Which one do you think is the better singer?
Paul Potts - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA
Susan Boyle - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OcQ9A-5noM
Paul Potts - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA
Susan Boyle - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OcQ9A-5noM