View Full Version : Things you did not know about Judith Sheindlin (Judge Judy)
An 80s Guy 10-16-2007, 06:18 PM First of all check out http://judgejudyisascam.com/
1.Is currently not a judge and has not been one for 11 years.
2.Serves as an arbitrator(person to settle disputes)on her television show
She makes 30 million dollars a year to lie to everywhere her show is aired
4.Has no legal power whatsoever
5.Her show's production company(Big Ticket productions)pays all judgements made by the former judge
some of her litigants are coached by the producers on what to say and do.
her audience is made of paid hollywood actors.
Ireneparalegal 10-16-2007, 06:48 PM The cases on Judge Judy are actual small-claims court cases, and Sheindlin operates according to the principles of the American legal system. She conducts her court in a manner similar to U.S. appellate courts and many international courts, taking on a more inquisitorial fashion. There are no lawyers present and participants defend themselves, which is standard in a small claims court. The people who appear on her show sign a waiver agreeing that arbitration in her court is final and cannot be pursued elsewhere unless she dismisses the case without prejudice. The award for each judgment is paid by the producers of the show from a fund reserved for each case. The remainder of the fund is split between the parties for a particular case.
Mr. Television 10-16-2007, 07:00 PM Judge Judy rocks. :D
Ireneparalegal 10-16-2007, 07:01 PM Judge Judy rocks. :D
I hear that! :lol: She takes no crap from anyone. ;) Too bad our criminal justice system can't be that way in Los Angeles. She'd have O.J., Robert Blake and Phil Spector on death row by now. :lol:
As for the production company paying the "lawsuits". That is true abt any judge show. It says so at the end of the credits. IT IS RIGHT THERE FOR ALL TO SEE. I don't see what scam people think she is committing. Sounds like pure Judge Judy hate.
Mr. Television 10-16-2007, 07:11 PM I hear that! :lol: She takes no crap from anyone. ;) Too bad our criminal justice system can't be that way in Los Angeles. She'd have O.J., Robert Blake and Phil Spector on death row by now. :lol:
As for the production company paying the "lawsuits". That is true abt any judge show. It says so at the end of the credits. IT IS RIGHT THERE FOR ALL TO SEE. I don't see what scam people think she is committing. Sounds like pure Judge Judy hate.
You got that right. :lol:
Yea I don't see it either. I think most of these court shows have been doing this for years. Its no big deal.
GoldenGirlsFan92 10-16-2007, 09:13 PM I don't believe this crap! Judge Judy is Great & tells it like it is.
Ireneparalegal 10-16-2007, 09:20 PM I don't believe this crap! Judge Judy is Great & tells it like it is.
That's why she is hated by some...they can't handle the truth! ;)
Let's make this the JUDGE JUDY APPRECIATION THREAD!! :lol:
Scoobiedoo30 10-16-2007, 10:24 PM I did not know none of that about Judge Judy
An 80s Guy 10-16-2007, 11:40 PM Sometimes The show does make up lawsuits.They did this in 1999 with The hollywood prostitute Divine Brown(She was caught with Hugh Grant).They aren't all real cases.The show follows absoloutley no state laws.Not even the arbitration law unless the litigants live in the state of California.She is not currently a real judge,She has no legal power.There's even a quote from her on imdb stating that the law is followed in her "Fake" courtroom than it is in an actual courtroom which isn't even near the truth I advise everyone to read the website that's in my signature and in the original post of my thread.She doesn't have experience with small claims court all she ever did as a judge was work with Juvenille delinquents(spelling) and familys.
An 80s guy
Former Judge Judy fan
Ireneparalegal 10-16-2007, 11:43 PM I don't think anyone will bother to read that when it is plain and simple it is merely arbitration aka small claims court. She applies the laws according to the state in which the tort took place. Oh by the way, Tort means "civil wrong". Any judge who is retired can do arbitration for a tort case or even state cases such as divorce (celebs do this) or for matters such as workman's compensation cases, unemployment cases, etc. As long as both sides agree in a written statement, then it can continue, as it does for Judge Judy's cases. Each side signs an agreement that they know whatever she rules, IS BINDING.
An 80s Guy 10-16-2007, 11:50 PM I think that some people should go to the website and read the Star Magazine article.I tried to add it as an attachment but it said that it exceeds the forums limit.the website and interviews all are coming from people who've done the show.One couple was told by a producer that judge judy likes it when people interupt.
Mr. Television 10-16-2007, 11:52 PM Star Magazine is a tabloid magazine, isn't it? I don't believe half the things they say.
Ireneparalegal 10-16-2007, 11:53 PM The Star magazine????? :rofl: Good source. :lol:
:brent Yeah, a good legal magazine.
I have a friend who appeared on People's Court (with the original judge, not the one that is there now) and he told me how they had to agree to let this RETIRED JUDGE be the one to decide their case, if they didn't sign the agreement, then they are free to have their cases heard in their area in small claims court. They find the people by going through the various small claims that are filed in various counties. They call them up (as they did with my friend) and asked him if he didn't mind his case being heard on People's Court. He obliged, sign the documents and won his case. He got his money and was not coached in any way. If anything, he was told to behave the way one is expected to behave in any courtroom, you respect and obey the judge and tell the truth.
Mr. Television 10-16-2007, 11:59 PM You would think this would be all over the news if it was true. It would be a major scandal and she's been on the air longer than any of these other current court shows.
Ireneparalegal 10-17-2007, 12:01 AM You would think this would be all over the news if it was true. It would be a major scandal and she's been on the air longer than any of these other current court shows.
Bingo! Exactly.
Yeah, Judge Judy in the same magazine as Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears...yeah, real scandal. :rofl:
People always have to knock the successful.
GoldenGirlsFan92 10-17-2007, 09:10 PM That's why she is hated by some...they can't handle the truth! ;)
Let's make this the JUDGE JUDY APPRECIATION THREAD!! :lol:
I Agree! They can't, and she has to put sense into their brains. Go Judge Judy!
Mr. Television 10-20-2007, 09:07 AM Ireneparalegal "You do not know what you are talking about" Being a paralegal (if you are) means you are not a lawyer and know just enough law to go out to bar shoot your mouth off and get your ass kicked. "The SHOW is a SCAM" I have said that had the JUDGE JUDY IS RIGGED article appeared in the mainstream press instead of Star Magazine, the world would know the Judge Judy SHOW IS A JOKE!
Notice: Star Magazine was never sued over the article because even though it’s a tabloid, it’s true that people are being abused behind the scenes, I have the proof the show paid me (WE SPLIT NO FUND), and they made it LOOK like I lost! Earth calling all know it alls, I WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO GET PAID (beyond the appearance fee) UNLESS AWARDED THE MONEY IN STUDIO!
Do a Google for Judge Judy. See: Judge (JOKE) Judy on page one. I have not been sued but WOULD absolutely LOVE IT IF THEY EVER TRIED…
I KNOW IT’S TOUGH NEWS IF YOU’RE A FAN. >>>BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE A FAN OF<<<
A new member who's first post is to slam Irene and bash Judge Judy. Hmmmm :lol: As I said before, it's common sense. If any of this was remotely true it would be in the mainstream media. And if you have first hand knowledge with proof, why don't you tell your story to a none tabloid publication instead of coming to a place called SO and worry about what people here think?
robyrob 10-20-2007, 09:31 AM Ireneparalegal "You do not know what you are talking about" Being a paralegal (if you are) means you are not a lawyer and know just enough law to go out to bar shoot your mouth off and get your ass kicked. "The SHOW is a SCAM" I have said that had the JUDGE JUDY IS RIGGED article appeared in the mainstream press instead of Star Magazine, the world would know the Judge Judy SHOW IS A JOKE!
Notice: Star Magazine was never sued over the article because even though it’s a tabloid, it’s true that people are being abused behind the scenes, I have the proof the show paid me (WE SPLIT NO FUND), and they made it LOOK like I lost! Earth calling all know it alls, I WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO GET PAID (beyond the appearance fee) UNLESS AWARDED THE MONEY IN STUDIO!
Do a Google for Judge Judy. See: Judge (JOKE) Judy on page one. I have not been sued but WOULD absolutely LOVE IT IF THEY EVER TRIED…
I KNOW IT’S TOUGH NEWS IF YOU’RE A FAN. >>>BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE A FAN OF<<<
SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE IS BITTER ABOUT LOSING THEIR CASE.
nezello 10-21-2007, 07:14 AM SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE IS BITTER ABOUT LOSING THEIR CASE.
"YOU CAN NOT TRULY WIN OR LOSE ON A PRETEND TV COURT SHOW"
nezello 10-21-2007, 07:18 AM A new member who's first post is to slam Irene and bash Judge Judy. Hmmmm :lol: As I said before, it's common sense. If any of this was remotely true it would be in the mainstream media. And if you have first hand knowledge with proof, why don't you tell your story to a none tabloid publication instead of coming to a place called SO and worry about what people here think?
It really helps if you can get all the information before you make a comment! I never told my story to Star Magazine other people had told theirs. If you had read the article you would know that! http://judgejudyisascam.com/Star_Magazine.html
The mainstream media will not criticize one of their own. The only hot seat (if you could ever call it that) that Judge Judy has ever been willing to face is Larry King. Coincidently, both Larry King and Judge Judy Sheindlin are both Jewish. Larry’s interview questions seem to be light?
News (lesson) from the media:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlon_Brando#Accusations_of_Jewish_stereotyping
nezello 10-21-2007, 07:34 AM The cases on Judge Judy are actual small-claims court cases, and Sheindlin operates according to the principles of the American legal system. She conducts her court in a manner similar to U.S. appellate courts and many international courts, taking on a more inquisitorial fashion. There are no lawyers present and participants defend themselves, which is standard in a small claims court. The people who appear on her show sign a waiver agreeing that arbitration in her court is final and cannot be pursued elsewhere unless she dismisses the case without prejudice. The award for each judgment is paid by the producers of the show from a fund reserved for each case. The remainder of the fund is split between the parties for a particular case.
Ireneparalegal "You do not know what you are talking about" Being a paralegal (if you are) means you are not a lawyer and know just enough law to go out to bar shoot your mouth off and get your ass kicked. "The SHOW is a SCAM" I have said that had the JUDGE JUDY IS RIGGED article appeared in the mainstream press instead of Star Magazine, the world would know the Judge Judy SHOW IS A JOKE!
Notice: Star Magazine was never sued over the article because even though it’s a tabloid, it’s true that people are being abused behind the scenes, I have the proof the show paid me (WE SPLIT NO FUND), and they made it LOOK like I lost! Earth calling all know it alls, I WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO GET PAID (beyond the appearance fee) UNLESS AWARDED THE MONEY IN STUDIO! http://judgejudyisascam.com/
Do a Google for Judge Judy. See: Judge (JOKE) Judy on page one. I have not been sued but WOULD absolutely LOVE IT IF THEY EVER TRIED…
I KNOW IT’S TOUGH NEWS IF YOU’RE A FAN. >>>BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE A FAN OF<<<
Mr. Television 10-21-2007, 08:19 AM It really helps if you can get all the information before you make a comment! I never told my story to Star Magazine other people had told theirs. If you had read the article you would know that! http://judgejudyisascam.com/Star_Magazine.html
The mainstream media will not criticize one of their own. The only hot seat (if you could ever call it that) that Judge Judy has ever been willing to face is Larry King. Coincidently, both Larry King and Judge Judy Sheindlin are both Jewish. Larry’s interview questions seem to be light?
News (lesson) from the media:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlon_Brando#Accusations_of_Jewish_stereotyping
I never said that you told your story to Star Magazine,,,I said if you have proof tell it to the mainstream media. If you don't do that then I'm not believing you. I don't know why you're giving me a Wikipedia article...you probably edited it yourself.
Mr. Television 10-21-2007, 08:20 AM Ireneparalegal "You do not know what you are talking about" Being a paralegal (if you are) means you are not a lawyer and know just enough law to go out to bar shoot your mouth off and get your ass kicked. "The SHOW is a SCAM" I have said that had the JUDGE JUDY IS RIGGED article appeared in the mainstream press instead of Star Magazine, the world would know the Judge Judy SHOW IS A JOKE!
Notice: Star Magazine was never sued over the article because even though it’s a tabloid, it’s true that people are being abused behind the scenes, I have the proof the show paid me (WE SPLIT NO FUND), and they made it LOOK like I lost! Earth calling all know it alls, I WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO GET PAID (beyond the appearance fee) UNLESS AWARDED THE MONEY IN STUDIO! http://judgejudyisascam.com/
Do a Google for Judge Judy. See: Judge (JOKE) Judy on page one. I have not been sued but WOULD absolutely LOVE IT IF THEY EVER TRIED…
I KNOW IT’S TOUGH NEWS IF YOU’RE A FAN. >>>BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE A FAN OF<<<
This sounds like a rerun. lol
nezello 10-21-2007, 12:27 PM I never said that you told your story to Star Magazine,,,I said if you have proof tell it to the mainstream media. If you don't do that then I'm not believing you. I don't know why you're giving me a Wikipedia article...you probably edited it yourself.
OK, you were given the links TO GET ALL THE INFORMATION before you make a comment! ALERT: THE MAINSTREAM HAS THE INFORMATION. IT'S YOUR JOB TO FIGURE OUT WHY THEY CHOOSE TO SUPPRESS IT.
OTHERWISE: You are just (one of the 25% Americans) who are beyond ****ing stupid! (AS IN WARNING THE ****ING COFFEE IS HOT!!!)
friendsfan77 10-21-2007, 12:31 PM SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE IS BITTER ABOUT LOSING THEIR CASE.
:rofl:
Mr. Television 10-21-2007, 12:40 PM OK, you were given the links TO GET ALL THE INFORMATION before you make a comment! ALERT: THE MAINSTREAM HAS THE INFORMATION. IT'S YOUR JOB TO FIGURE OUT WHY THEY CHOOSE TO SUPPRESS IT.
OTHERWISE: You are just (one of the 25% Americans) who are beyond ****ing stupid! (AS IN WARNING THE ****ING COFFEE IS HOT!!!)
Now you're starting to act like a troll. You're boring me.
Ireneparalegal 10-21-2007, 01:47 PM Now you're starting to act like a troll. You're boring me.
Hmmmm, more like the person who made this thread just made another username which IS AGAINST THE RULES. Which is why I reported their butt and we will let TJ handle it. :D
An 80s Guy 10-21-2007, 04:33 PM Hold up!!!!I made this thread.I did send this thread to the creator of the owner of the website which is nezello.I've been a member here for over 2 years and I know the rules.I'm sure that TJ or someone has a way to check IP Adresses and he'll see that this is coming from another computer in a whole other city and state.
Mr. Television 10-21-2007, 05:43 PM Hold up!!!!I made this thread.I did send this thread to the creator of the owner of the website which is nezello.I've been a member here for over 2 years and I know the rules.I'm sure that TJ or someone has a way to check IP Adresses and he'll see that this is coming from another computer in a whole other city and state.
That explains it. No wonder nezello is on spin control. The guy has an agenda and shouldn't be taken seriously.
An 80s Guy 10-21-2007, 06:01 PM That explains it. No wonder nezello is on spin control. The guy has an agenda and shouldn't be taken seriously.
What agenda would he have?He does have proof of payment from the show.It's not like he's being paid for his website or talking here.
Ireneparalegal 10-21-2007, 06:09 PM Ohhh TJ will love knowing that one member brought another person to sign up as a member SIMPLY TO BASH AND ANNOY. This is nice. :lol: I love the report button. :lol: Kinda dumb to admit bringing someone here for one agenda and that person calls a beloved member a name.
An 80s Guy 10-21-2007, 06:16 PM I did not ask him to register.I did not realize he did until a few hours ago.I sent him the link to ask his opinions of what you guys were saying.I'll post the exact message as soon as i can get back on the computer.You'd be reporting me for nothing.I sent him that message on that video website last week.I already forgot about this thread and that message until this morning.
Mr. Television 10-21-2007, 08:02 PM What agenda would he have?He does have proof of payment from the show.It's not like he's being paid for his website or talking here.
He lost a case. Judge Judy probably embarrassed him on tv. I watch Judge Judy to be entertained. If I wanted to watch boring court shows I'd watch Court TV. I don't believe him and all this mainstrean coverup business. If their's one thing I know about the media is they love good juicy scandals. Why would I believe anything in Star Magazine? They have proven to be frauds in the past but I'm supposed to believe them now? Give me a break. And the fact that this person cares so much about his agenda that he registers at a Sitcoms message board to try to convince a couple members that he doesn't know that Judge Judy is a fraud says a lot. A similar thing happened when another member registered trying to convince people that he was Raven Symone's brother. I'm not some teenager that would fall for things like this.
An 80s Guy 10-21-2007, 08:56 PM He lost a case. Judge Judy probably embarrassed him on tv. I watch Judge Judy to be entertained. If I wanted to watch boring court shows I'd watch Court TV. I don't believe him and all this mainstrean coverup business. If their's one thing I know about the media is they love good juicy scandals. Why would I believe anything in Star Magazine? They have proven to be frauds in the past but I'm supposed to believe them now? Give me a break. And the fact that this person cares so much about his agenda that he registers at a Sitcoms message board to try to convince a couple members that he doesn't know that Judge Judy is a fraud says a lot. A similar thing happened when another member registered trying to convince people that he was Raven Symone's brother. I'm not some teenager that would fall for things like this.
This is off topic but who is Raven Symone?
Ireneparalegal 10-21-2007, 09:21 PM He lost a case. Judge Judy probably embarrassed him on tv. I watch Judge Judy to be entertained. If I wanted to watch boring court shows I'd watch Court TV. I don't believe him and all this mainstrean coverup business. If their's one thing I know about the media is they love good juicy scandals. Why would I believe anything in Star Magazine? They have proven to be frauds in the past but I'm supposed to believe them now? Give me a break. And the fact that this person cares so much about his agenda that he registers at a Sitcoms message board to try to convince a couple members that he doesn't know that Judge Judy is a fraud says a lot. A similar thing happened when another member registered trying to convince people that he was Raven Symone's brother. I'm not some teenager that would fall for things like this.
Oh yeah, I remember that stooge. :rofl: He has yet to prove his case. WHY? because he too is a fraud. What a lame thread this is anyways. Why do you try so hard to get us to read links (I won't) and bring someone here simply to harass (which is against the rules) and try sooooooo hard to convince a few people who obviously don't believe a damn word either one of you say? :brent :rofl: Poor babies.
Mr. Television 10-22-2007, 12:26 AM This is off topic but who is Raven Symone?
classic thread. :rofl:
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=199810
An 80s Guy 10-22-2007, 10:26 AM Oh yeah, I remember that stooge. :rofl: He has yet to prove his case. WHY? because he too is a fraud. What a lame thread this is anyways. Why do you try so hard to get us to read links (I won't) and bring someone here simply to harass (which is against the rules) and try sooooooo hard to convince a few people who obviously don't believe a damn word either one of you say? :brent :rofl: Poor babies.
I did not bring him to this board.I asked him to read the thread and tell me what he thinks of what you're all saying.I did not ask him to register.He does have proof of payment from the show.Why would Big Ticket productions pay the person who lost his case 14 hundred dollars?I did not try to convince anyone all I did was post what I read and believe.
Ireneparalegal 10-22-2007, 05:04 PM Whatever.:rolleyes:
An 80s Guy 10-22-2007, 05:28 PM I can give you my password info for the Veoh website(The website the message was sent on.You can go into my sent folder and read the exact freakin message.I never at any point asked him to register or call anyone any names.The statement that jews cover up for eachother(Larry King and JJ)was wrong.I seriously don't understand why you're being like this like accusing people of multiple usernames and me of asking him to come over here to harass people.don't beleive the wbesite f you don't want to.
nezello 11-06-2007, 10:17 AM I can give you my password info for the Veoh website(The website the message was sent on.You can go into my sent folder and read the exact freakin message.I never at any point asked him to register or call anyone any names.The statement that jews cover up for eachother(Larry King and JJ)was wrong.I seriously don't understand why you're being like this like accusing people of multiple usernames and me of asking him to come over here to harass people.don't beleive the wbesite f you don't want to.
TO: An 80s guy (David) I'm sorry your being attacked by the blind sheep! "Kudo's to you for seeking the truth"
"I do not shoot my mouth off, I attack back when I can prove what I say"
TO: The in denial fans. Judge Judy is not a champion for justice! She makes money at any human beings expense (innocent or guilty, go on the show and you are fair game). You would think this would have been exposed hard and long ago in the mainstream media. Till this day Hollywood's dirty little secret has been suppressed. Be proactive look a little deeper...
I'm not against the Jewish people although I would think their religious leaders would challenge Judge Judy over what is right and wrong. My cousin is Jewish and I love him dearly and would gladly take a bullet for him! My point was "NEPOTISM" >>>FIGURATIVELY<<<
Marlon Brando (One of the most famous actors of the 21st century) SHOCKED America when he said on LKL (Larry King) the Jews control Hollywood (hence the media). OK is that anti-Jewish or true? Judge Judy is Jewish. Her show came to be from Spelling Entertainment (owner Aaron Spelling also Jewish). Spelling Entertainment owns Big Ticket Productions that produces the Judge Judy SHOW and who paid me for being on the SHOW.
The only hot seat Judy has ever been on (if you can call it that) is Larry King. his questions seem light and filtered, coincidentally he is Jewish. 60 minutes and some local affiliates of NBC New York, etc. have had Judge Judy on their shows. But none ask Judy is or has anybody gotten hurt from being on your show? NEPOTISM OR NOT? >>>FIGURATIVELY<<<
Notice: Star Magazine was never sued over the article (JUDGE JUDY IS RIGGED) because even though it's a tabloid, its true that people ACTUALLY have been abused behind the scenes >>>LITERALLY<<< IMAGINE THAT...
Nobody has ever accused Judge Wapner of being a fraud and abusive to show participants.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=gj6SrvBbYLk
Enjoy the SHOW!
robyrob 11-06-2007, 12:08 PM so wait, now in addition to calling something that is OPENLY ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE SHOW'S CREDITS, and is COMMON PRACTISE ON EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE STUPID COURT SHOWS ON TELEVISION, you are claiming that Judith "Judge Judy" Sheindlin is Larry King's NEPHEW and that they are evil because they are Jewish?
...alrighty then.
friendsfan77 11-06-2007, 01:32 PM Wow. I don't even like Judge Judy and I think these claims are ridiculous.
judy4ever 02-10-2009, 12:25 PM To 80's Guy: I might even believe some of that stuff in Star, like the producers encouraging the litigants to do or say things they know will piss her off. It's all about entertainment, it's a reality show. But I do feel that alot of these litigants really do and say they things they do because their feelings are genuine and real, just like Judy is. And the fact that the litigants get paid is not news, everyone knows those courtroom shows pay the people to be on there...you know you have the risk of being humiliated so there has to be some sort of incentive. Your comments about her crack me up, because it's apparant you are obviously upset over how you were treated on national tv, and want to hurt her in any way you can. I went to your hate judy website and found it all interesting, but not true. She may be retired and yes, small claims is not family court. But alot of her cases do involve families. It does not matter, though, because I think she could do anything. It doesn't make her less a judge. She was chosen to do this small claims court reality show because she is so sharp minded and witty and producers knew it would draw an audience. And speaking of your claim that the audience are all paid hollywood actors, that is also 100% false, since I myself was offered tickets for whenever I could make it to the Los Angeles area. And I am definitely not an actor.
I was stunned to learn her age when watching her Justice Served dvd. Her mind is still razor sharp and for that reason, she will continue to draw in viewers for as long as she chooses to do that show. She is #1 and she knows it too. Long live Judge Judy
Dude111 09-22-2025, 07:34 PM 1.Is currently not a judge and has not been one for 11 years.
4.Has no legal power whatsoever
I dont understand how they could let her PLAY A FAKE JUDGE!!!!
I thought she was a real one......
Ah man!!
|