View Full Version : Jolie Loves Adopted Children Differently


felicitylen
01-09-2007, 09:20 PM
http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2007-01-09/#3

Angelina Jolie insists she has different feelings towards each of her kids and feels especially close to her adopted children because they've already led such a hard life. The Oscar winner has two adopted children with Brad Pitt, Maddox and Zahara, as well as their biological daughter Shiloh, who was born in May. Jolie tells Elle magazine that she's more partial towards her adopted children, saying, "I think I feel so much more for Mad and Z because they're survivors, they came through so much. Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born. I have less inclination to feel for her... I met my other kids when they were six months old, they came with personality. A newborn really is this... yes, a blob! But now she's starting to have a personality... I'm conscious that I have to make sure I don't ignore her needs just because I think the others are more vulnerable."

What are your thoughts on her quote?

TJL
01-09-2007, 09:46 PM
Um, did she adopt her two kids when they were teenagers whe had spent thier entire childhood in a poverty stricken country?
I mean I'm no child expert, but I'm not so sure if Mad and Z have that much memory of thier terrible lives before she adopted them.

I don't remember a single thing I did when I was five months old.

;)

felicitylen
01-09-2007, 10:30 PM
It sounds like she's comparing her adoptive kids to her biological child. Either way, a parent should never compare their kids to each other.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 01:13 AM
What I don't understand is that whenever Ms. Jolie tries to sound intelligent, she comes off as a really stupid idiot who just happens to use big words.

God for once, I wish she would shut up, period and send the message to Lindsay Lohan and Beyonce too!

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 01:38 AM
I guess the same can be said abt her marriages...she must have felt differently abt "promising to love til death to you part..." to each man she was married to.

Stupid Jolie.

comedyfreak
01-12-2007, 09:41 AM
What I don't understand is that whenever Ms. Jolie tries to sound intelligent, she comes off as a really stupid idiot who just happens to use big words.

God for once, I wish she would shut up, period and send the message to Lindsay Lohan and Beyonce too!
I agree, but you can also blame all the stupid media coverage that gets put on them. In this day and age there isn't one actress right now that I'd go ga ga over, they just don't have the class of the actresses from the 50's and 60's. Even Lauren Bacall doesn't think an actress like Nicole Kidman is a legend yet.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 10:08 AM
I agree, but you can also blame all the stupid media coverage that gets put on them. In this day and age there isn't one actress right now that I'd go ga ga over, they just don't have the class of the actresses from the 50's and 60's. Even Lauren Bacall doesn't think an actress like Nicole Kidman is a legend yet.

Yes!! I'm starting to have more respect for Ms. Bacall now. These actresses today, man, they get on my nerves. I know I was only born in 1978, but I respect actresses like the late Natalie Wood, Lauren Bacall, Lena Horne etc. because despite rumors of their scandalous personal lives, they knew how to be ladies.

But, Lindsay and Nicole(Ritchie) sort of remind me of Ms. Wood in her younger days which says a lot.

Paris Hilton and her clan would have NEVER been stars back then, not even in the 1990's(my favorite decade). Would Mean Girls been a hit back in 1956? I don't think so! Just My Luck? Hell to the no!

Mr. Cranky
01-12-2007, 11:56 AM
More wizDUMB from the beautiful idiot files. Doesn't this bag of wind have another marriage to bust up?

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 12:03 PM
More wizDUMB from the beautiful idiot files. Doesn't this bag of wind have another marriage to bust up?

LMAO!!!! She's the Liz Taylor of this generation!

I think she's pretty but I can't understand why so many people go nuts over her. She always look like she need a bath, even in designer couture.

Give me Natalie Wood anyday over her!!!!

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 12:41 PM
Sorry, J-Ho is the Liz Taylor of this generation...(Jennifer Lopez in case you didn't get the HO).

I am sick of seeing Jolie's face and that ugly dry up, cracked up lips of hers on every entertainment channel and magazine. Can someone show that lady some gloss or something?

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 01:11 PM
Sorry, J-Ho is the Liz Taylor of this generation...(Jennifer Lopez in case you didn't get the HO).

I am sick of seeing Jolie's face and that ugly dry up, cracked up lips of hers on every entertainment channel and magazine. Can someone show that lady some gloss or something?

LMAO!!! Forgot about J-Ho(She's lives down here in Miami and yes, she may have liked my outfits a few times but other than that, she's so annoying.)

I'm glad i'm not the only one who thought that Angelina could use some chapstick or Bonne Bell, hell, vaseline might do the trick!

All that money in the world and she can't buy 75 cent Chapstick or Blistex.

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 01:14 PM
LMAO!!! Forgot about J-Ho(She's lives down here in Miami and yes, she may have liked my outfits a few times but other than that, she's so annoying.)

I'm glad i'm not the only one who thought that Angelina could use some chapstick or Bonne Bell, hell, vaseline might do the trick!

All that money in the world and she can't buy $75 Chapstick or Blistex.
I think she uses Vaseline in other places. ;) :eek: You are not alone in that thought abt her lips. I mean, that crack in the middle of her lip looks like the crack you see on a guy whose pants hang off his ass with the underwear exposed. JUST UGLY.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 01:24 PM
I think she uses Vaseline in other places. ;) :eek: You are not alone in that thought abt her lips. I mean, that crack in the middle of her lip looks like the crack you see on a guy whose pants hang off his ass with the underwear exposed. JUST UGLY.

:eek:

Which I really don't understand why everyone goes ga-ga over her lips, big lips are sexy but not when it looks like a powdered donut.

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 01:27 PM
:eek:

Which I really don't understand why everyone goes ga-ga over her lips, big lips are sexy but not when it looks like a powdered donut.
Thank you. Those lips are an insult to women (like me) who have naturally pouty lips BUT DON'T LOOK DRY AS THE MOJAVE DESERT!!!!!! There was a chat a while back abt this same topic, I was shocked at just how many people really hate her lips. I mean, when they aren't so dried up and that ugly crack in the middle, her lips would be beautiful. I just don't get it. :crazy:

Number 9 Dream
01-12-2007, 01:59 PM
I have never liked that woman--her charity work and supposed generousity always comes off like a big PR thing.

This article just makes me despise her more.

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 02:10 PM
I have never liked that woman--her charity work and supposed generousity always comes off like a big PR thing.

This article just makes me despise her more.
I know. I agree. I know that she does do her charity work, for which I can at least give her props for, but I sometimes wonder at what expense? Is it for PR? I hope not. I pray she is indeed doing it for the good of charity and helping children. I remember how Princess Diana and Audrey Hepburn did their charity work and know in my heart that it was done out of love and concern. It just seem weird how out of the blue Jolie seemed to go from this weird, Billy Bob Thorton humping (ewwwww) girl to suddenly someone who is an ambassador.
It doesn't help that she got involved with a married man, regardless if his marriage was in trouble, you don't have an affair with any married person.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 02:37 PM
I know. I agree. I know that she does do her charity work, for which I can at least give her props for, but I sometimes wonder at what expense? Is it for PR? I hope not. I pray she is indeed doing it for the good of charity and helping children. I remember how Princess Diana and Audrey Hepburn did their charity work and know in my heart that it was done out of love and concern. It just seem weird how out of the blue Jolie seemed to go from this weird, Billy Bob Thorton humping (ewwwww) girl to suddenly someone who is an ambassador.
It doesn't help that she got involved with a married man, regardless if his marriage was in trouble, you don't have an affair with any married person.

Took the words right out of my mouth. I don't know why Angelina is being held as a saint when her records aren't clean. I honestly think the reason why she's a do-gooder is to get Hollywood on her side(after all before adopting Maddox and charites, she was an outsider, the freak.).

Can't speak on the Brad/Angelina thing because I would be a hypocrite, but yeah, that was wrong. She probably feels as though she should get a pass for that because she's a saint who adopted these 'poor' kids and gives money to these 3rd world countries. It's amazing how everytime she's plays a 'do-gooder' there are ALWAYS cameras around but when Audrey Hepburn, Princess Diana, and Oprah did it, the cameras don't come as often.

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 02:42 PM
I wish the "camera" would focus more of the attention on those who are deserving of it. I don't want to hear abt Britney and her no panties. I don't care to watch entertainment news and see papparazzi chasing Jolie and Brad in a rickshaw, who cares? I don't want to hear abt Paris' latest boyfriend, blah blah blah. I remember when Entertainment Tonight when it debuted, it had REAL ENTERTAINMENT news, movies, t.v. shows, ratings on shows, the making of a new movie, REAL STUFF. It just seems everywhere I go, there is Jolie's pic. But then again, they chase her because of pics and $$$$.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 02:48 PM
I wish the "camera" would focus more of the attention on those who are deserving of it. I don't want to hear abt Britney and her no panties. I don't care to watch entertainment news and see papparazzi chasing Jolie and Brad in a rickshaw, who cares? I don't want to hear abt Paris' latest boyfriend, blah blah blah. I remember when Entertainment Tonight when it debuted, it had REAL ENTERTAINMENT news, movies, t.v. shows, ratings on shows, the making of a new movie, REAL STUFF. It just seems everywhere I go, there is Jolie's pic. But then again, they chase her because of pics and $$$$.

:lol: Britney's lack of panties is something I don't want to see, lesbian or not!!!

ET pissed me off in the worst way when they didn't take the time to honor Natalie Wood's 25th year of her death, instead all they cared about was those pop tarts. Burned me to the core:mad: !

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 02:51 PM
:lol: Britney's lack of panties is something I don't want to see, lesbian or not!!!

ET pissed me off in the worst way when they didn't take the time to honor Natalie Wood's 25th year of her death, instead all they cared about was those pop tarts. Burned me to the core:mad: !
See, that is a good example of something they could have done. But NOOOOOOOO....talking abt POP TARTS (good one!!) is what they care abt. God, I remember when Natalie died...THAT WAS SHOCKING!!!! I was 17 when that happened. What a loss.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 02:56 PM
See, that is a good example of something they could have done. But NOOOOOOOO....talking abt POP TARTS (good one!!) is what they care abt. God, I remember when Natalie died...THAT WAS SHOCKING!!!! I was 17 when that happened. What a loss.

Ms. Wood was awesome, I just don't like how she was made as some whore who should have died from A.I.D.S(a bunch of people had made that comment after reading her biographies saying she asked to be raped.). In fact, Natalie reminds me a lot of my mother(god rest her soul) even looks like her!!!

What puzzles me is that Am I Annoying.com lists her as bisexual, is this true?(crossing my fingers)

Ireneparalegal
01-12-2007, 03:00 PM
WTF? I can't believe people would sink so low as to mock the memory of someone who obviously loved Robert Wagner and was so dearly loved. I wouldn't bother with a website that says such garbage abt a lovely woman who had more class than most of these "stars" nowadays.

As far as bisexuality, this is the first time I ever heard of this. I never heard anything abt that.

JuicyCoutureGirl
01-12-2007, 03:16 PM
WTF? I can't believe people would sink so low as to mock the memory of someone who obviously loved Robert Wagner and was so dearly loved. I wouldn't bother with a website that says such garbage abt a lovely woman who had more class than most of these "stars" nowadays.

As far as bisexuality, this is the first time I ever heard of this. I never heard anything abt that.

This wasn't the only website that has made a mockery out of her. Some website message boards say crap even lower like..

"She jumped off the boat after she got results from her A.I.D.S test"
"She was a high class whore" etc. etc.

Yeah, I had to double check my screen when she was listed as bisexual. I almost fell out of my chair!