you would think the writers would have given Janet(Lawson) a different last name, since Rollo Larson was still a regular character on the show...hmmm

you would think the writers would have given Janet(Lawson) a different last name, since Rollo Lawson was still a regular character on the show...hmmm


Rollo last name was LARSON

Rollo last name was LARSON
He is Rita Larson's boy you know.

would it be Funny if Janet and Rollo would be like Brother and Sister since both there name are Lawson.

can u see Fred Releated to Rollo.lol

I wonder what red would think if he was releted to Rollo

looked it up, and you are right Larson was Rollo's last name. They never really pronounced the "R" so it sounded like Lawson. Still, why give a new character such a similar sounding name?

looked it up, and you are right Larson was Rollo's last name. They never really pronounced the "R" so it sounded like Lawson. Still, why give a new character such a similar sounding name?



If I'm the TVResearcher why would u need to look it up?-lol

The difference in the Janet's son's age has always been baffling to me. We he proposed the kid was a young teenager but later on they changed and made him into a little kid.

Fred: "If you are looking for a kindly old grandfather....turn on the Walton's."

Fred: "If you disturb me from my sleep, this kindly old grandfather will turn into a wicked witch with a switch and heat up your rear end."

I have a Question if Fred was Reated to Rollo how would they be releated

I have a Question if Fred was Reated to Rollo how would they be releated

If Rollo and Janet were brother and sister, and Janet married Lamont, Fred and Rollo would be related by marriage.

Rollo would be his son's (Lamont) brother-in-law.

Lawson was Janet's first husband's name so Rollo would only be related to her husband.......