from http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91059-13466788,00.html

Teen's Mannequin Love-In

Updated: 15:21, Monday November 21, 2005

A teenager has been charged with indecent exposure after he was caught trying to have sex with a female mannequin on display at an arts centre.

Security guards found Michael Plentyhorse, 18, sprawled with the dummy on the floor with his trousers and pants down.

Police spokesman Loren McManus said: "There was inappropriate activity between him and the mannequin.

"That's the only way I know how to put it."

Guards said they had noticed several times before that the dummy's clothes had been removed at the centre in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, US.

If convicted, Plentyhorse may be registered as a sex offender.

Hope Matchan, of the prosecutors' department, said: "People might say it's relatively harmless.

"But I certainly would want to know if this person was my neighbour."


*******

I say let the young couple alone - who are we to judge their love? :heart:

LOL

:rotflmao:

Oh man, this reminds me of the best King Of The Hill episode when Bobby? fell in love with his sisters head doll :rofl:

well, if you can't get any, it's either a mannequin... or your right hand, lol

Wow, is this true?! :brent

Plentyhorse... :brent

o_O

I suppose if his dream is to have sex with Pamela Anderson, a plastic dummy is as close as he can get.

Wow.... is this serious? Whoa...that IS quite desperate, especially in a public place. :eek:

:brent

:lol: I didn't know mannequins were anatomically correct. I hope she doesn't end up pregnant...they'll have to move her to maternity.

:brent


:lol: I didn't know mannequins were anatomically correct. I hope she doesn't end up pregnant...they'll have to move her to maternity.
:lol:

:lol: I didn't know mannequins were anatomically correct. I hope she doesn't end up pregnant...they'll have to move her to maternity.

Plus, if the mannequin DID end up pregnant, it would almost be like "Seed of Chucky: The True Story".

:rofl:

Well.... at least we know she can't complain about him being a lousy lover! :eek:

I bet that goes BOTH ways though.

From what I hear anyway, she wasn't exactly a superstar in bed either! According to unnamed sources who've gotten 'intimate' with the mannequin in question, it's almost like she just LIES there the whole time! Huh!

I bet that goes BOTH ways though.

From what I hear anyway, she wasn't exactly a superstar in bed either! According to unnamed sources who've gotten 'intimate' with the mannequin in question, it's almost like she just LIES there the whole time! Huh!
:lol:

I bet that goes BOTH ways though.

From what I hear anyway, she wasn't exactly a superstar in bed either! According to unnamed sources who've gotten 'intimate' with the mannequin in question, it's almost like she just LIES there the whole time! Huh!

:lol:

:brent

Stupid-ass loser. :lol:

It is funny, but I feel sorry for the guy. #1.) He was that desperate #2.) He was that desperate to do it more than once OR he was getting sloppy seconds from a mannequin #3.) He's going to be a registered sex offender for this? Come on, that's ridiculous! I think I'd rather not know if this guy was living next to me.

:brent

Plentyhorse?


What if it was PANTYHOSE? :brent

that guy needs
http://img476.imageshack.us/img476/9598/ashleeheartfelts5up.png (http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php)

Well, at least he's got a date to the prom.

;)

Well, at least he's got a date to the prom.

;)
:brent

Well, at least he's got a date to the prom.

;)
Unless he dumps her for "not putting out."

It is funny, but I feel sorry for the guy. #1.) He was that desperate #2.) He was that desperate to do it more than once OR he was getting sloppy seconds from a mannequin #3.) He's going to be a registered sex offender for this? Come on, that's ridiculous! I think I'd rather not know if this guy was living next to me.
oh, I think that you'd wanna know if you happened to have a mannequin in your window.

I'd put away the lawn gnomes too.

I'd also be wary about putting out any reindeer on display at Christmas time, just to be on the safe side.

I'd also be wary about putting out any reindeer on display at Christmas time, just to be on the safe side.
not Rudolph? :(

Well hey!

If this kid has already frequently molested Sally Mae the "Special Needs" Mannequin, then I don't think anybody's safe! Not even Rudolph...

*NOTE: The mannequin in question's name has been changed here, for her safety, privacy and protection*

:lol: I didn't know mannequins were anatomically correct. I hope she doesn't end up pregnant...they'll have to move her to maternity.

:rofl:

Well, at least he's got a date to the prom.

;)
:rofl:

Well, at least he's got a date to the prom.

;)
:brent

Don't you just love the perverts in the world LOL!!!! :lol:

not Rudolph? :(
Darn! That would've made it kinky.... :lol:

wow... how anatomically correct do they make those things these days? I remember Barbie and Ken use to have the same parts.