View Full Version : Shows hated by critics, but loved by viewers
Mr. Monitor 09-06-2005, 05:10 PM Name some of the shows that were absolutely reviled by critics but were enjoyed by audience's and had successful runs anyway.
1. Yes Dear (never watched it, but hear the critics despise it)
2. Full House
3. According to Jim
USTVFanFromUK 09-06-2005, 05:56 PM I think a big one here would be Three's Comapny. Critics never cared at all for that show, but it had its strong following.
ShawnieMac 09-06-2005, 06:29 PM Two of the biggest ones were on CBS at one point of time or another: Gilligan's Island and The Dukes of Hazzard. The shows were so critically bad, CBS itself hated those shows, but they quickly changed their tune when the ratings came out. Gilligan's (RIP Bob Denver) got a raw deal of the expansion of Gunsmoke to a full hour in 1967, and Gilligan's was still successful enough to run at least another 3-4 years. As for the Dukes, the one-year departure of Tom Wopat and John Schneider basically killed the success of that show, and if watch the last two seasons of Dukes, the writing got even goofier.
Since Bob Denver's death today (R.I.P. Bob) reminded me alot about "Gilligan's Island," I guess we can add that show to the list.
The critics hated that show when it originally aired, but it became one of the greatest all time favorites in syndication, and will continue to be a fan fave worldwide for years to come.
Mr. Television 09-06-2005, 06:34 PM The critics always hated The Beverly Hillbillies and never understood how it became the #1 show on tv.
ShawnieMac 09-06-2005, 08:03 PM The critics always hated The Beverly Hillbillies and never understood how it became the #1 show on tv.
To go along with my above quote about CBS, I remember watching the E! True Hollywood Story on the Hillbillies, and CBS executives very critical of the show as well, until of course, the ratings came and it was the #1 show on TV at one point, and was at least in the top 10 in all nine years of its original run.
snl 70s show fan 09-07-2005, 12:39 AM hee haw not one critic liked it when it started in 1969 and it ran until 1992 so they must have been doing something right also friends was not well liked by some critcs at first and believe it or not a few critcis didnt like mash when it started
treky 09-07-2005, 02:29 AM when "MASH" debuted, Time magazine called it "the biggest dissapointment of the 1972-73 fall season"
TVFactFan 09-07-2005, 08:53 AM Name some of the shows that were absolutely reviled by critics but were enjoyed by audience's and had successful runs anyway.
1. Yes Dear (never watched it, but hear the critics despise it)
2. Full House
3. According to Jim
Critics hated the
Jeffersons
Three's Company
Laverne and Shirley
Mork and Mindy
Chain Gang Member 09-07-2005, 03:43 PM I think a big one here would be Three's Comapny. Critics never cared at all for that show, but it had its strong following.
Yeah.John always apologized about the show until he realized how great the show was liked by viewers
treky 09-07-2005, 03:49 PM I think critics also didn't like "All in the Family" when it first started.
USTVFanFromUK 09-07-2005, 05:12 PM I think critics also didn't like "All in the Family" when it first started.
Yes, it was labeled as "vulgar TV" in the beginning, but all that changed when the show swept the Emmy's that season.
YoliUSA 09-07-2005, 05:22 PM "The Facts of Life"
"Happy Days"
Johnny S 09-07-2005, 06:44 PM Four Words........ Buffy The Vampire Slayer (only 1 Emmy nomination for the episode "Hush"!!!)
USTVFanFromUK 09-07-2005, 06:46 PM Four Words........ Buffy The Vampire Slayer (only 1 Emmy nomination for the episode "Hush"!!!)
I don't think that's based on how bad or good Buffy was or not. Buffy suffered the fate of being on two smaller networks which don't have the same amounts of advertising money as the four big networks. Notice UPN and The WB never get any serious recognition come Emmy time .
Johnny S 09-07-2005, 07:42 PM I don't think that's based on how bad or good Buffy was or not. Buffy suffered the fate of being on two smaller networks which don't have the same amounts of advertising money as the four big networks. Notice UPN and The WB never get any serious recognition come Emmy time .
Ya... but the show was a 20th Century Fox show, but Fox never picked it up. Also it was the first show of it's kind. (maybe The X-Files was kinda similar)
"The Flying Nun."
Critics hated it, but viewers loved it. The viewers had God on their side, too, because Catholic nuns everywhere praised the show for showing that nuns had lives outside of the church!
USTVFanFromUK 09-07-2005, 08:19 PM Ya... but the show was a 20th Century Fox show, but Fox never picked it up. Also it was the first show of it's kind. (maybe The X-Files was kinda similar)
Yes, but all of the shows on the UPN and the WB are from big production studios like Fox, Warner Brothers, Sony, etc...
dawsongirl 09-08-2005, 04:13 PM How about The Brady Bunch?
TVFactFan 09-08-2005, 04:26 PM How about The Brady Bunch?
Viewers and Critics hated the brady bunch-lol
Dumballa 09-08-2005, 05:05 PM C'mon y'all, we've seen some worthy ones, but how about 'Married with Children'? I remember when that show came out in the late eighties and critics absolutely hated it and did not think it would last past the first season, if that. We all know that it lasted a lot longer than that. :talk:
TVFactFan 09-08-2005, 06:31 PM C'mon y'all, we've seen some worthy ones, but how about 'Married with Children'? I remember when that show came out in the late eighties and critics absolutely hated it and did not think it would last past the first season, if that. We all know that it lasted a lot longer than that. :talk:
Married with Children and the Jeffersons have a couple of things in common. Both Shows were hated by Critics, Both shows lasted 10 years, and both shows ended without a series Finale.
Chain Gang Member 09-09-2005, 09:42 AM I thought the finale to Married...With Children was when Kelly almost got married
ShawnieMac 09-09-2005, 01:30 PM Married with Children and the Jeffersons have a couple of things in common. Both Shows were hated by Critics, Both shows lasted 10 years, and both shows ended without a series Finale.
Plus, both shows were produced by Ron Leavitt and Michael Moye (Leavitt and Moye created Married), and both came from Embassy/Columbia Pictures TV/Sony Pictures TV.
I thought the finale to Married...With Children was when Kelly almost got married
Yeah, it was technically, but it really wasn't suppose to be that way. The cast and crew of Married...with Children were awaiting word from Fox on whether they wanted to renew the show for a 12th season. They taped the finale before Fox made its final decision, and the network didn't make the decision until after the finale aired.
Chain Gang Member 09-09-2005, 01:42 PM Oh
Johnny S 09-09-2005, 04:44 PM Married with Children and the Jeffersons have a couple of things in common. Both Shows were hated by Critics, Both shows lasted 10 years, and both shows ended without a series Finale.
MWC was 11 years. :D
Mr. Monitor 09-09-2005, 06:22 PM How can you hate The Jeffersons? It's one of the greatest shows in TV history.
TVFactFan 09-09-2005, 06:33 PM How can you hate The Jeffersons? It's one of the greatest shows in TV history.
Tv Critics said George Jeffersons was too NEGATIVE when it first aired in 1975
TVFactFan 09-09-2005, 06:36 PM MWC was 11 years. :D
1987-1997 is TEN YEARS, you mean it had 11 seasons
TVFactFan 09-09-2005, 06:39 PM I thought the finale to Married...With Children was when Kelly almost got married
That was the SEASON Finale not the Series Finale
|