View Full Version : Little Miss Panasoffkee


themaninblack
03-30-2005, 12:49 AM
did they ever find out who ms. panasofkee was? as i remember it, they said she had had at least one child, after they found her in a swamp or something

Ninjaman
03-30-2005, 03:32 AM
Not that I'm aware of. This case has been mentioned many times on this board, and so if you were to do a search, you could find out a lot of information. This was a sad case, and the details you mentioned were correct. Not only that, but she had had some type of ankle surgery as well, and they said that she could have been of Native American descent. They found her under the Panasoffkee overpass in Florida with a belt around her neck. That's all I know at this point, and I somehow doubt that the case will be solved now after so many years. Terrible.

DF Justin
03-31-2005, 03:32 AM
one of the cases that has stayed with me for years...

Kane
03-31-2005, 08:34 PM
Not that I'm aware of. This case has been mentioned many times on this board, and so if you were to do a search, you could find out a lot of information. This was a sad case, and the details you mentioned were correct. Not only that, but she had had some type of ankle surgery as well, and they said that she could have been of Native American descent. They found her under the Panasoffkee overpass in Florida with a belt around her neck. That's all I know at this point, and I somehow doubt that the case will be solved now after so many years. Terrible.

I've pointed this out before, and I'll do it again: Just because a case has been unsolved for decades DOES NOT mean that it could never be solved.

It may not be solved today, tomorrow, next week, or what have you. But there's always some chance of a resolution.

Ninjaman
04-01-2005, 07:25 AM
Kane,

I don't disagree with you. I should have worded my comment a little differently. Of course there is the possibility of it being solved. We all hope for that. What I should have said is that all anyone seems to know about this case is what was profiled on UM, which may be incomplete at best. From what I understand, people have done web searches for this case and have come up with nothing. What does that mean? How active is the investigation at this point? These are questions that need to be asked when talking about the likelihood of a case being solved.

The Barbs
04-01-2005, 09:38 AM
Is Ms. Panasoffkee on the Doe network site? I couldn't find anything about her. I have another question for Kane. Are you a member of the Doe network? Just curious. Thanks.

Kane
04-01-2005, 10:58 AM
Is Ms. Panasoffkee on the Doe network site? I couldn't find anything about her. I have another question for Kane. Are you a member of the Doe network? Just curious. Thanks.

No, Barbs, I'm sorry to say that I'm not a member of the Doe network. I just simply came across that site at one time, and noticed that the site includes numerous missing persons who were profiled on UM.

So far, I haven't found any links related to Ms. Panasoffkee, who doesn't appear to be listed at Doe Network. However, DN contains profiles of missing persons who disappeared sometime before Ms. Panasoffkee was discovered dead (which was in early 1971). So it wouldn't be entirely impossible for any of those persons to have been her. One never knows.

shock80
04-02-2005, 04:11 AM
You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

Kane
04-02-2005, 01:56 PM
You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

On the contrary, I wasn't being rude. I'm just making a point of something. Plus, I wasn't trying to deprive anyone of expressing their opinion (even though some of the opinions other people have stated are not entirely informed).

Besides, you can't determine whether someone is rude based solely on what they typed. When someone types, it doesn't neccessarily say whether they were being polite. Maybe they expressed an opinion rudely, but then again, maybe they didn't. It's not what you say, but how you say it.

nohwheregirl
04-03-2005, 01:46 AM
You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

You have a pretty well-documented history of being rude on this discussion board, Shock80. It's like the troll calling the kettle black...or was it the pot? I always get these things mixed up. ;)

Back to the topic at hand, I think this case is especially unfortunate because there are just so many unidentified persons out there like her. If someone is not actively looking for her, the chances of the case being solved look pretty grim. I guess the best we can do at this point is hope that there is someone alive who knows her and cares about her. It's sad to think that there might not be anyone that fits that description.

shock80
04-03-2005, 05:13 AM
Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.



Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble.

As for you nowhere girl, again you werent spoken too and u put your worthless two sense into my conversation again.

How about you keep the comments to yourself unless directly spoken too. As for the pot and the kettle, I'll give you a perfect place to put it.

DeeeNah
04-03-2005, 11:50 AM
Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.



Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble.

As for you nowhere girl, again you werent spoken too and u put your worthless two sense into my conversation again.

How about you keep the comments to yourself unless directly spoken too. As for the pot and the kettle, I'll give you a perfect place to put it.
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=135266

Kane
04-03-2005, 01:21 PM
[QUOTE=shock80]Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.



Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble. QUOTE]

What statute of limitation? There's no statue of limitations on murder.

And believe me, it was never my intention to talk down to people, or to be rude to any extent. Besides, I haven't done any name-calling here. And like I said earlier, it's not what you say, but how you say it. Don't judge someone unless you know for sure what their state of mind was when they typed a message. I mean, you weren't present when I typed the message.

As for hope being "all gone" in the Panosoffkee case, do you know that for a fact? I don't know that for a fact, and I seriously doubt that anyone else does.

shock80
04-09-2005, 06:09 AM
I ve read and I do know that it wont be solved, its closed, see ya ms pano

Ninjaman
04-09-2005, 02:39 PM
I'm just curious, Schock80, what is the information that you are referring to that leads you to believe that it won't be solved? I'm curious about the case in general, and would like to know more. I'm sure everyone else would as well. Thanks.

shock80
04-10-2005, 07:19 AM
Ive done some research since 1988. Ive read articles, notes etc.. Since she died over 30 years ago the likelyhood of any family members being alive is impossible. If they were someone by now would have claimed a missing child. If she was the only child, her parents would be over 100. If she had a brother or sister, they may not have known about her. To not knowing if ur child is missing is silly. Her parents may have died at a young age leaving herself to fend all alone.

Kane
04-10-2005, 01:51 PM
Ive done some research since 1988. Ive read articles, notes etc.. Since she died over 30 years ago the likelyhood of any family members being alive is impossible. If they were someone by now would have claimed a missing child. If she was the only child, her parents would be over 100. If she had a brother or sister, they may not have known about her. To not knowing if ur child is missing is silly. Her parents may have died at a young age leaving herself to fend all alone.

Indeed, it is silly to not know if your child is missing. However, don't be too sure that it would be "impossible" for any of her family members to be living today. She could still have some living relatives. Maybe she had cousins (or other family members) who were old enough to remember her prior to her disappearance, and just never saw the Miss Panasoffkee segment. And perhaps, there were relatives who were born after she disappeared, and only know her through pictures and what they've been told about her. Maybe if they ever happen to come upon the Miss Panasoffkee profile, they might notice some similiarities, and look into the possibility that it could be her. And maybe she had some neighbors and close friends who still wonder to this day what had become of her. (Plus, I doubt that her parents would currentlly be "over 100," if they're still living. They could be in their 80s.)

So, even 30+ years after the discovery of her corpse, there are still some existing possibilities that could lead to her identification.

shock80
04-11-2005, 02:16 AM
If she had family members still living today then someone would have known about her and her disappearance.. That story was all over the U.S in the early 70's and it covered the papers in florida as well. You are talking about 34 years now. If and only if she had relatives that were living back then, the chances of them being alive now is small. If those relatives had children, how would they have known about her if the relatives parents didn't know about her. It's been 35 years and not one claim to this woman. No name, no identy and a sketched face that may or may not be accurate. When you're child is missing any parent whos sane would try to locate them. You have to assume she was either a runaway who's parents passed on. The moxley case was totally different. She has living parents, relatives, friends etc. She has a name. This girl doensn't and to not have a name and no known report of any family member trying to find her shows me that her bloodline is non-existent.