Angela Hammond - Girl abducted from phone booth

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

So, those witnesses that have all corroborated Rob's story, just what? Made it up?

What story? That they seen a truck?

Okay they saw a truck near the payphone. Did they SEE the truck take Angela? Did they SEE Rob chase the truck? That's the meat and potatoes.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

I'm sorry, am I missing something? Do you know them personally and can offer substantive proof and facts that Rob was not a nice guy?

I didn't think so.

Sorry, sweetheart, you grasped the smallest straw again. YOU made the claims that Rob was a nice guy, and that YOU saw nothing wrong with their relationship. I don't know this. I don't know them.

I said he's suspect #1 in her disappearance. I've said motives on why he would've done it. But I don't know the intimate parts of their relationship, like you claimed you have from watching UM.

Here. Since you like evidence.

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

I have seen no proof of discord in their relationship. I have seen nothing which would indicate that Rob was anything but a stand-up guy.

[LooksLikeCRicci]

Originally Posted by freakbook

You see my point being with COULD'VE is that there's no transcript. It just shows that they talked. So, let's do this. How about you show me evidence that would be admissible into court regarding this phone conversation, that said they talked about what they actually talked about? Not just Rob's word, but hard evidence. No "he said..." I want to see the conversation. The actual transcript. When you show this, then I'll throw my "COULD'VE theory" into the trashcan.

I'll be waiting. Thanks, Mrs. Attorney.

Yep. Just ignore all the people that can corroborate his timeline. Ignore everything just to argue your flawed logic.

At this point, I'm convinced you're just trolling all of us with this persistent and condescending line of dialogue. Just in case you need it, to be "condescending" means "having or showing a feeling of patronizing superiority." If you need to have it broken down further, just Google it.

I would strongly advise you to refrain from calling me "Mrs. Attorney" or "sweetheart" in the future.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

Yep. Just ignore all the people that can corroborate his timeline. Ignore everything just to argue your flawed logic.

At this point, I'm convinced you're just trolling all of us with this persistent and condescending line of dialogue. Just in case you need it, to be "condescending" means "having or showing a feeling of patronizing superiority." If you need to have it broken down further, just Google it.

I would strongly advise you to refrain from calling me "Mrs. Attorney" or "sweetheart" in the future.

How am I trolling? Because I'm shooting holes in your logic? What trolling have I done? I've stated my theories, just like everyone else here has. If I'm trolling, then everyone here who posts what they think happened is trolling. Correct? That's your logic.

Is trolling a new term for disagreeing? I don't think so.

I'll stop calling you those names, when you stop falsely labeling me a "troll".

And what people have witnessed his timeline? His brother said he was home, and on the phone. Cool. I've pointed that out as well. Some people saw the truck, but didn't see it do anything. Great. He later went to the cops. Terrific.

Keep going.

[alistaircranium]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

Yep. Just ignore all the people that can corroborate his timeline. Ignore everything just to argue your flawed logic.

At this point, I'm convinced you're just trolling all of us with this persistent and condescending line of dialogue. Just in case you need it, to be "condescending" means "having or showing a feeling of patronizing superiority." If you need to have it broken down further, just Google it.

I would strongly advise you to refrain from calling me "Mrs. Attorney" or "sweetheart" in the future.

I you.

[Jon]

Originally Posted by freakbook

No one else saw Rob be a stand-up guy.

Being 18, and possibly about to raise another guys baby? I'm sure that's better than waking up with Folger's in your cup. And let's not forget that the ex-boyfriend was also a suspect. Was Rob happy that her, and the ex we're probably still keep contact and having a baby?

Did you make that up? No one involved in the case, or the victim's families or friends ever said anything against Rob. And what's your source for knowing the father of her unborn child?

I think It's really messed up for you to make stuff up about the victim, especially after you accused other forum members of making things up.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

I would strongly advise you to refrain from calling me "Mrs. Attorney" or "sweetheart" in the future.

I will publicly address, that I apologize for my condensing tone, and name calling, but not for my stance.

I'm in no way shape or form, angry or mad at anyone. However, we have to accept each other's theories.

If people can argue my theories, then I should be free to argue back without half of the forum grabbing pitchforks.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by Jon

Did you make that up? No one involved in the case, or the victim's families or friends ever said anything against Rob. And what's your source for knowing the father of her unborn child?

I think It's really messed up for you to make stuff up about the victim, especially after you accused other forum members of making up things up.

"No one else saw Rob be a stand-up guy"

^ This was sarcasm. What I mean't by "no one saw him being a stand-up guy" as in no one saw him chasing the truck, or being where he said he was at the time of the crime. As in no concrete witnesses of the actual crime. Not his actual behavior. Angela's family think he's innocent, so he can't be that bad.

What did I make up? It's known that the baby was possibly her ex boyfriends, and in the segment it's shown on an article that he was a suspect?

What did I make up??

[Jon]

What do you mean "It is known?" That is not a source.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by Jon

What do you mean "It is known?" That is not a source.

"Speculated". Sorry. Also, I said "possibly", not sure fire.

It wasn't known who the actual babies father was. It was speculated between Rob, or the ex. Both we're considered suspects, and given polygraphs. So I "speculated" that if Rob knew the baby was her ex's then that could've been motive.

Is there a source that says Rob was the father for certain? Or does it just say that she was pregnant?

[DALLASTEXAN!!]

Originally Posted by freakbook

I will publicly address, that I apologize for my condensing tone, and name calling, but not for my stance.

I'm in no way shape or form, angry or mad at anyone. However, we have to accept each other's theories.

If people can argue my theories, then I should be free to argue back without half of the forum grabbing pitchforks.

I've refrained from replying to your theories out of respect. I do not see you as a legit poster just being honest. I think you find cases and take the most callous theory possible in order to start a debate. I can see why people think that is trolling. But if you are not a troll as you say... you get too personal when people reply to your theories. If you are going to take unpopular stances at least be respectful. I think if we can take the personal attacks out of here we can have clean debates.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by DALLASTEXAN!!

I've refrained from replying to your theories out of respect. I do not see you as a legit poster just being honest. I think you find cases and take the most callous theory possible in order to start a debate. I can see why people think that is trolling. But if you are not a troll as you say... you get too personal when people reply to your theories. If you are going to take unpopular stances at least be respectful. I think if we can take the personal attacks out of here we can have clean debates.

Nor, do I think of you as a poster with logic. I've disagreed just about everything that you've had to say. Since we're both being honest.

Again, everyone can call me a troll, but this is UNSOLVED MYSTERIES. These are mostly COLD CASES. People are going to have multiple theories. Not everyone is going to agree. Just because I think Kurt Mcfall was met with foul play doesn't make me "fake", it means I look at the case and decide for myself.

And let me set something straight, my theories are not mean't to cause a debate, they are my theories. I'm not a sheep. I'm not blindly siding with everyone so the moderators can pat me on the head. I've backed up my theories, and have provided sound logic. Just because you can't refute them doesn't make me a troll, or a "fake poster", it just means that you can't debunk them.

And like I say, it takes two to tango. People here have gotten blantly upset with me, and have been very aggressive, but it's not called out because they're in the majority. I've seen earlier posters in this very thread get the same treatment.

People here LOOOVE to call others "aggressive", or a "troll" when they're not sucking up, and rehashing weak theories. I'm not into trying to "fit in" to this sheep-minded, high school clique. I'm here to discuss cold cases on Unsolved Mysteries.

Again, don't call me "fake" because you can't argue with me. That's a cop out. You've refrained from replying to me, because you know you can't.

As it stands I've broke no rules. I've stated theories and people have argued with me, and I've argued with people. I can admit to being condescending, and getting "aggressive" when discussing cases, sure. I've seen multiple people flip out. Just stop trying to single me out, because I don't go with the crowd.

This isn't an "JUST AGREE WITH EVERYTHING WE SAY" forum. It's Unsolved Mysteries. You'd have to be insane to think I just agree with everything that's said without questioning it.

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by TakeAWildGuess

If you're going to use the comma after "Nor," then it would make more sense to add another one after "do I," which should read like this: "Nor, do I, think..." But really the comma technically shouldn't be there at all.



"Mean't" is not a word. The inclusion of "-n't" at the end of a word is when you're making a contraction of one word with the word "not," so "is not" becomes "isn't," "has not" becomes "hasn't," etc. There is no "mea not" because "mea" is not a word. Pretty sure you meant "meant."



Blatantly. You meant blatantly.



People get called "troll" when they're being unnecessarily condescending and "aggressive," so, yes, I think it applies here.



Right. You admit it. And that's why people say you're a "troll."

There's not a problem with having differing opinions. You might want to be a little nicer about it though. Also, I'm knowingly being a troll here, because I think you need a lesson in how if feels to be condescended to. But you do make more typos than the casual poster.

Whoooooa dude. You sure poked massive holes in my theories with your grammar lesson. Your point sure proved that Rob is innocent. I'm convinced now. I could care less about my typos. They obviously know what I mean.

Here's the deal. If you have a problem with me, PM me. You obviously have no interest in discussing this case, so your point is moot. You have a personal problem with me, PM me. You want to discuss the case, do it here.

Enough of these personal digs. I understand that everyone wants to be the forum hero by defeating the bad guy, but this is derailed enough. If you're respectful, I'll be respectful. You have a problem PM me.

[LooksLikeCRicci]

So, Dyno/Robin: We at #1 yet?

[freakbook]

Originally Posted by LooksLikeCRicci

So, Dyno/Robin: We at #1 yet?

I want my royalties