Nick at Nite says they Goofed! - Page 2 - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Oregon Tv Addict · 08-08-2001, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JT:
Excuse me but Cheers is NO WHERE in this state or the next two.I really do like both shows so bug off!And to 'James' I think you are the most brain dead person alive.I mean all the shows you like are stupid.I mean anyone here likes "The Brady Bunch"? I think they are stupid!I especially think they need to find their way off of NAN!

Thank you very much! I thought I was the only one welcoming "Cheers" and "Family Ties". And, I agree with you again, how could people like the VERY overplayed "The Brady Bunch"? I dunno..maybe I just watched it too much on TBS before it came to NAN, but still, I find the show very annoying.

Sean Snow · 08-09-2001, 01:23 PM

I dislike "Cheers", but maybe my opinion will change when I see it again (One of the Local Stations Where I Live Shows It.....Forgot which one), but I really want to see "Family Ties". I'm gonna tape the marathon......but hey maybe I'll hate it!

LucyFan · 08-21-2001, 06:03 PM

JT, I am sorry but YOU are the one that needs to "bug off". I Love Lucy has been a Nick at Nite favorite ever since the show debuted on the channel in 1994. Who cares if the show has been on there for 7 years, so what? The Andy Griffith Show was on TBS for nearly 20 years which is way longer than ILL on N@N. My point is that I feel Nick at Nite should keep all of the fans favorites (MTM,DVD,The Lucy Show,Jeannie,Bewitched, Happy Days,Mork & Mindy,Laverne & Shirley, Three's Company,The Munsters,The Addams Family,I Love Lucy,The Brady Bunch,Gilligan's Island,Dennis the Menace,Rhoda,Bob Newhart Show,ect)from the 50's, 60's, and 70's like in the beginning when it began in 1985. By Adding newer shows like Cheers, Family Ties, Cosby Show, Roseanne, ect is basically making Nick at Nite a non-classic tv channel. Nick at Nite should be a Classic TV Sitcoms Channel rather than a "dump" of newer shows.

Lynn · 08-22-2001, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LucyFan:
By Adding newer shows like Cheers, Family Ties, Cosby Show, Roseanne, ect is basically making Nick at Nite a non-classic tv channel.

Agreed! Full House is another one that doesn't belong on Nick at Nite.

1972dude · 08-22-2001, 04:33 PM

Yes! who do they think they are adding 80's shows, I'm already sick of those cheers commercials! And when they say nick at nite is being taken over by the fox network that is very annoying and what is he carrying a purse? They don't even show the classic 80's shows like newhart or something! And if they want to be 80's why don't they show archie bunkers place and lou grant. And then they're going from 70's to 80's to 90's in 3years what's next! shows that are stil currently on the air! And full house how annoying! And roseanne talk about overplayed Its been in syndication ever since it ended! They think this will get good ratings, there must be more stupid people than I thought!

Oregon Tv Addict · 08-22-2001, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LucyFan:
JT, I am sorry but YOU are the one that needs to "bug off". I Love Lucy has been a Nick at Nite favorite ever since the show debuted on the channel in 1994. Who cares if the show has been on there for 7 years, so what? The Andy Griffith Show was on TBS for nearly 20 years which is way longer than ILL on N@N. My point is that I feel Nick at Nite should keep all of the fans favorites (MTM,DVD,The Lucy Show,Jeannie,Bewitched, Happy Days,Mork & Mindy,Laverne & Shirley, Three's Company,The Munsters,The Addams Family,I Love Lucy,The Brady Bunch,Gilligan's Island,Dennis the Menace,Rhoda,Bob Newhart Show,ect)from the 50's, 60's, and 70's like in the beginning when it began in 1985. By Adding newer shows like Cheers, Family Ties, Cosby Show, Roseanne, ect is basically making Nick at Nite a non-classic tv channel. Nick at Nite should be a Classic TV Sitcoms Channel rather than a "dump" of newer shows.

Personally..I think you are being selfish. Just because you don't like the new programming doesn't mean that other people do too. You are not thinking buisness-wise..the classic shows will not get the ratings...the "new" classics will. Look at how well NAN is doing in the ratings...do you think it was due to I Love Lucy? Or All in The Family? No..its was because of Three's Company and Differn't Strokes (newer shows). And think about..I mean, young children watch NAN, and do you think they want to see an old black and white sitcom? No..they want to see newer things...things that are closer to their time.

And..btw, most of the shows that you have named that need to be on NAN have ALREADY been on NAN...their time is up. Its time for programs that have not been on NAN, newer things.....

1972dude · 08-22-2001, 07:39 PM

These shows aren't new classics, they aren't classics at all they're just plain stupid!

ThomasE · 08-24-2001, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lynn:
Agreed! Full House is another one that doesn't belong on Nick at Nite.

You guys are nailing this. This is very true. I agree. Full house I can accept as a NAN show but I would wait another 7 years before adding the show. I did get Cheers on my local station. I really wasn't into the show too much. I preffered Taxi over Cheers.

Roseanne coming to a Nickelodeon network?Uh........No! HOw many eps will they have to skip. Don't get me wrong I love this show, but it is not NAN material though. TBS can keep this one. BTW a few years back I was teasing my brother about Roseanne coming to TBS and was only kidding. The next thing I know I see a promo for the show on TBS from 1998. I'm like Dang! Then I make a joke about Roseanne coming to NAN last year on the board and then Blam! Let the Oxygen network take this one.

RainMan · 11-19-2002, 10:45 PM

I don't get it......why did Nick-At-Nite ever call it an Un-Realathon when we deal with these situations everyday?

Nate

DarleneIllyria · 11-19-2002, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AAOT
Nick already has too many shows!

Times sure have changed within the months this post was done. Isn't it ironic, dontcha think? A little too ironic. Just getting my singing out of the way for now.

DarleneIllyria · 11-19-2002, 11:25 PM

They seriously screwed up all the way around.

Crap, I meant to edit. Geez! Sorry about the 2 posts.

Stormtracker TF · 11-19-2002, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Robert Tilton

Has anybody else seen this clip from Nick at Nite? I saw it during the Andy Marathon just now!

A voiceover comes on while the clip shows footage from Gilligans & says:

"We Goofed! We forgot to show Gilligans in the Un Real a Thon. Watch on Monday blah blah blah".

I suspect its a put on but you never know with Slick Nick.

------------------

Riches & Glory are in the vow of faith! Send a check or money order for at least $1000, preferably to my account in Zurich; I have a ski lodge up there!

HEY! I watched that when it came on back then! I was like a HUGE GI fan back then!

breakdownx · 11-20-2002, 01:06 AM

anyone know the current ratings for the shows on now? I can't stand cheers, cosby I have on once in awhile but it's just to corny, Coach doesn't interest me. None of the 80's shows besides the facts of life really interested me. All in the family is now being pushed back to 2am soon for some goofy 80's show.

In a few years, watch them add a Nick Snick on Saturday and Sunday with the Fresh Prince and shows like that.

I love Janet · 11-20-2002, 02:44 AM

Here's what N@N needs to do Take of the supid ass Cheers and Cosby shows and put on I Love Lucy,Laverne and Shirly,4 Eppies of Three's Company lol,Facts of life,Happy days,I Dream of Jeannie,The Ropers and Three's a Crowd i mean who wants to watch 7 eps of Cheers Coach and cosby??? Where i live Three's Company comes on at 2:00 in the morning and sometimes i cant stay up that late to tape it

Freakzilla · 11-20-2002, 04:51 PM

What N@N needs to do is keep the shows they have now and quit doing the double takes. Just one episode of every show and repeat that episode later. Of course, that is what N@N used to do and works out better for all the shows.

Here's my schedule, Sunday-Thursday

9 p.m., 1:30 The Cosby Show
9:30, 2 a.m. Family Ties
10 p.m., 2:30Cheers
10:30, 3 a.m. Coach
11 p.m., 3:30 All in the Family
11:30, 4 a.m. Three's Company
12 a.m., 4:30 The Brady Bunch
12:30, 5 a.m. Happy Days
1 a.m., 5:30 Charles in Charge

All the times are eastern.

On Friday and Saturday, the first airings of Cosby and Family Ties would be skipped. The schedule would go straight from the kid's shows to Cheers. That would keep the schedule a bit more stable and less confusing. No one likes to tune in for Cheers and see Cosby.

11-19-2002, 11:25 PM	#26
DarleneIllyria Gone Forum Star Join Date: Oct 15, 2000 Posts: 19,086	They seriously screwed up all the way around. Crap, I meant to edit. Geez! Sorry about the 2 posts.
	Last edited by DarleneIllyria; 11-19-2002 at 11:29 PM.

11-20-2002, 04:51 PM	#30
Freakzilla Member Forum Regular Join Date: May 23, 2000 Location: Portage, Michigan, United States Posts: 556	What N@N needs to do is keep the shows they have now and quit doing the double takes. Just one episode of every show and repeat that episode later. Of course, that is what N@N used to do and works out better for all the shows. Here's my schedule, Sunday-Thursday 9 p.m., 1:30 The Cosby Show 9:30, 2 a.m. Family Ties 10 p.m., 2:30Cheers 10:30, 3 a.m. Coach 11 p.m., 3:30 All in the Family 11:30, 4 a.m. Three's Company 12 a.m., 4:30 The Brady Bunch 12:30, 5 a.m. Happy Days 1 a.m., 5:30 Charles in Charge All the times are eastern. On Friday and Saturday, the first airings of Cosby and Family Ties would be skipped. The schedule would go straight from the kid's shows to Cheers. That would keep the schedule a bit more stable and less confusing. No one likes to tune in for Cheers and see Cosby.
	Last edited by Freakzilla; 11-20-2002 at 05:04 PM.

08-09-2001, 01:23 PM	#17
Sean Snow moo Forum Star Join Date: May 06, 2001 Location: Georgia Posts: 10,408	I dislike "Cheers", but maybe my opinion will change when I see it again (One of the Local Stations Where I Live Shows It.....Forgot which one), but I really want to see "Family Ties". I'm gonna tape the marathon......but hey maybe I'll hate it!

08-21-2001, 06:03 PM	#18
LucyFan Still Loving Lucy! Forum Fanatic Join Date: Sep 23, 2001 Location: In the Wonderful World of Lucy! Posts: 8,198	JT, I am sorry but YOU are the one that needs to "bug off". I Love Lucy has been a Nick at Nite favorite ever since the show debuted on the channel in 1994. Who cares if the show has been on there for 7 years, so what? The Andy Griffith Show was on TBS for nearly 20 years which is way longer than ILL on N@N. My point is that I feel Nick at Nite should keep all of the fans favorites (MTM,DVD,The Lucy Show,Jeannie,Bewitched, Happy Days,Mork & Mindy,Laverne & Shirley, Three's Company,The Munsters,The Addams Family,I Love Lucy,The Brady Bunch,Gilligan's Island,Dennis the Menace,Rhoda,Bob Newhart Show,ect)from the 50's, 60's, and 70's like in the beginning when it began in 1985. By Adding newer shows like Cheers, Family Ties, Cosby Show, Roseanne, ect is basically making Nick at Nite a non-classic tv channel. Nick at Nite should be a Classic TV Sitcoms Channel rather than a "dump" of newer shows.

08-22-2001, 04:33 PM	#20
1972dude Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jul 18, 2001 Location: Brainerd,Minnesota,USA Posts: 48	Yes! who do they think they are adding 80's shows, I'm already sick of those cheers commercials! And when they say nick at nite is being taken over by the fox network that is very annoying and what is he carrying a purse? They don't even show the classic 80's shows like newhart or something! And if they want to be 80's why don't they show archie bunkers place and lou grant. And then they're going from 70's to 80's to 90's in 3years what's next! shows that are stil currently on the air! And full house how annoying! And roseanne talk about overplayed Its been in syndication ever since it ended! They think this will get good ratings, there must be more stupid people than I thought!

08-22-2001, 07:39 PM	#22
1972dude Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jul 18, 2001 Location: Brainerd,Minnesota,USA Posts: 48	These shows aren't new classics, they aren't classics at all they're just plain stupid!

11-19-2002, 10:45 PM	#24
RainMan Member Senior Member Join Date: Feb 09, 2002 Location: Churdan, Iowa USA (Wish it was the UK so I could go to Holmfirth, West Yorkshire to see the cast of Last of the Summer Wine!) Posts: 1,175	I don't get it......why did Nick-At-Nite ever call it an Un-Realathon when we deal with these situations everyday? Nate

11-20-2002, 01:06 AM	#28
breakdownx Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Nov 20, 2002 Posts: 8	anyone know the current ratings for the shows on now? I can't stand cheers, cosby I have on once in awhile but it's just to corny, Coach doesn't interest me. None of the 80's shows besides the facts of life really interested me. All in the family is now being pushed back to 2am soon for some goofy 80's show. In a few years, watch them add a Nick Snick on Saturday and Sunday with the Fresh Prince and shows like that.

11-20-2002, 02:44 AM	#29
I love Janet Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Nov 15, 2002 Location: Dayton Texas Posts: 228	Here's what N@N needs to do Take of the supid ass Cheers and Cosby shows and put on I Love Lucy,Laverne and Shirly,4 Eppies of Three's Company lol,Facts of life,Happy days,I Dream of Jeannie,The Ropers and Three's a Crowd i mean who wants to watch 7 eps of Cheers Coach and cosby??? Where i live Three's Company comes on at 2:00 in the morning and sometimes i cant stay up that late to tape it