View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
2010s and 2020s One Season Wonders / 2000s One Season Wonders / 1990s One Season Wonders / 1980s One Season Wonders / 1970s One Season Wonders / 1960s One Season Wonders / 1950s One Season Wonders / Unsold TV Pilots and Unaired Series
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#16 | |
|
I'm Rich Bitch
Forum Icon
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
shaking his head
tvresearcher, i just dont understand your logic illogic
at all a new man bought the apt he was the new star the supporting cast remained how hard a concept is that to handle? |
|
__________________
I have not been trading for some time now, so please do not ask---- sorry, i cannot help you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
I did not say Esther was the MAIN character, I said she was the one that was spinned off into the series along with Bubba |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
Quote:
that makes even less sense--- a spinoff is a show where u take a supporting character on 1 show and PROMOTE them up into the lead role on another show---- or you take the PREMISE of 1 show and spin it off with a new star you do NOT spinoff a supporting actor and KEEP THEM in the supporting role that is just plain nonesense YES Phil wheeler was the NEW STAR, it was HIS SHOW, esther and bubba were just carried over from sanford and son 2+ 2 = 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
23 Years at Sitcoms Online
Forum Icon
Join Date: Jun 06, 2003
Location: Somewhere you're Not
Posts: 62,132
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
Sonny |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
well u COULD say that but youd be wrong
PHIL WHEELER was set up to be the new lead star b/c they new the supporting characters couldnt carry the show |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
well if that is the case then sanford arms is not a spinoff then |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
Neither could phil since the show was yanked after 4 weeks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
that the Phil Wheeler character was just dull
they needed a lead star with some charisma and he just didnt have it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 291
|
If you havent seen Checking In before how can you say it was a mistake to spinoff Florence's character. Or are you just saying that because the series only lasted a few shows?
Did any Jeffersons castmembers appear in any shows to help boost ratings? In hindsight, FLO should have never had her own series OR should she have returned after Diane Ladd left the series? Aj |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
No I was just going by the length it was on the air. And no George or Weezy wasn't guest stars on Checking In. They probably would have if Checking In was picked up for the 1981-82 TV season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
i watched all of these at the time
FLO was a one gimmick character and NEVER strong enough to carry a show the show was BAD the only good ep was the thanksgiving show where he deadbeat dad came to down, that was nice CHECKING IN was not bad at all, i liked it----but i think they realized there was only so much they could do with florence as the lead and decided to kill it THE SANFORD ARMS (which IS a spinoff, u can spinoff a couch into a new show and its STILL a spinoff) was just awful! |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
Sanford Arms was much more WATCHABLE than Flo and Checking In |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Lamont says Smile!
Forum Veteran
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Deep in the Heart of Nowhere
Posts: 5,217
|
i cannot believe u really believe that
SANFORD ARMS was awful i remember when it was first coming on i thought it woudl suck BUT when i saw the opening and saw some of the old gang around, i thought MAYBE it would be ok after watching the 1st ep i hated it so much it was awful and the PHIL WHEELER Character was just plain unfunny and i hated his kids! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
Yes Sanford Arms was not Good but it was better than FLO. I rather watch a PBS special than FLO-lol |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|