Angela Hammond - Girl abducted from phone booth - Page 16 - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Cori aka ChrisSCrush · 04-06-2009, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimmyHendricks

Here is the link to the KC Star article:

http://www.kansascity.com/637/story/1125960.html

I had no idea that she was pregnant.

Neither did I. Are people absolutely convinced the boyfriend didn't do it or have someone else do it to get out of marrying her?

Apostapler · 04-06-2009, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cori aka ChrisSCrush

Neither did I. Are people absolutely convinced the boyfriend didn't do it or have someone else do it to get out of marrying her?

If I recall correctly, he passed a polygraph and was eliminated very early on. Also, he had proposed marriage to her. I think he was fine with the idea of marrying Angela.

TracyLynnS · 04-06-2009, 10:11 AM

I agree with crazytatsink. Why, nearly 20 years later, does this new article come out with such different information than what we've come to know as facts?

For one thing, why was the boyfriend's vehicle changed from a car (as we have be told) to a truck that is almost identical to the kidnapper's vehicle? The article goes into a lot of detail on this point. If this was fact, from the beginning, wouldn't people close to the case have pointed that out?

OhReally · 04-06-2009, 10:36 AM

I don't think anyone was ever "told" that Rob's vehicle was a car, I think it was assumed since that's what was used in the UM segment. Hollywood does weird things. But, if anyone can find an original article that states "Rob was driving a car", I'd love to see it. I don't think the focus of the investigation was what kind of vehicle Rob was driving, rather, it was on what kind of vehicle the suspect was driving. Rob could have been driving a scooter for all that it matters, the important vehicle was the suspect's vehicle.

Quote:

Now they are saying that the Hammond case is NOT related to the Darby and Kenney cases? They also say that it is not related to springfield three? How do they know this with only one of these cases being solved? Unreal

Why is that unreal? Maybe the investigators "investigated" and made this determination. I don't get you guys, if the cops don't investigate, they get accused of "not doing anything" if they do investigate and come to a conclusion that doesn't set right with you guys, it's "unreal". Let them do their job, I'm sure they know what they're doing.

lorenhammond83 · 04-06-2009, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cori aka ChrisSCrush

Neither did I. Are people absolutely convinced the boyfriend didn't do it or have someone else do it to get out of marrying her?

Rob (Angie's Boyfriend) did not do it. It is not feasible considering the minute amount of time he would have had to cover up the evidence before he reported the news of her disappearance. We need to out rule him completely as the police have done on multiple occasions and leave it that way.

I do believe are answers lie in the Clinton/Surrounding area and the persons involved are very close knit and most likely heavy drug users (rural Missouri so Meth is a good assumption). People know what happened and they are afraid of coming forward…

Please be our friend on MySpace and now Facebook to help spread awareness and to also get updates on Angie’s case.

www.myspace.com/angelamariehammond

http://www.facebook.com/people/angel...ond/1637589229

Tipsters may remain anonymous by emailing Angela’s family at angelamariehammond@gmail.com or by contacting the Clinton Police Department at (660) 885-2679 or tips@clintonmopd.com

MegtheEgg86 · 04-06-2009, 03:49 PM

From the Star:

She wasn’t there when her daughter was taken, but later, Cook watched an “Unsolved Mysteries” crew re-create the abduction. A very convincing actress played Angela Hammond.

“That girl could scream,” Cook said

I concur. That scream sounds like something out of a nightmare.

kane7474 · 04-06-2009, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazytatsink

In my own opinion I hope these two burn in hell while their bodies still have feeling, they are predators that got off doing alot and the others that were accomplices in these kidnappings need to get the balls to step forward and put their mucscle where their mouths are. The ones that were named marshall, greg, cheevers, and parel sitting out there not having a worry about what they were involved in and just laying back while everyone is trying to figure this out and just bottling up all the info that we all need to solve these cases. In my opinion Marvin and Jess were involved in the three cases, there was also an attempted abduction before either angela or trudy, Where is this person and why didnt they get her to do an ID on marvin and Jess, hmmm maybe another coverup just to keep from having to do some real investigation among the missouri law enforcement!!!!!! Like I said these two need to come forward their asses are already going to burn when they die so why not just fess up and take the torturing punishment that they deserve. They need to feel the pain these women had to go through, damn unfortunate they cant get out for a couple days so we can treat them how they need to be treated! As I said IN MY OPINION!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im glad someone else feels the other suspects named in Rush's letters should be investigated. I think by doing this investigators might uncover exactly what happened to these "other women" that he mentioned. It may well turn out that one of them was Angela or Sheryl. Then again the prosecutors would have to admit that this information was available to them since 1994 and they choose to do nothing with it so don't hold your breath.

kane7474 · 04-06-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhReally

I don't think anyone was ever "told" that Rob's vehicle was a car, I think it was assumed since that's what was used in the UM segment. Hollywood does weird things. But, if anyone can find an original article that states "Rob was driving a car", I'd love to see it. I don't think the focus of the investigation was what kind of vehicle Rob was driving, rather, it was on what kind of vehicle the suspect was driving. Rob could have been driving a scooter for all that it matters, the important vehicle was the suspect's vehicle.

Why is that unreal? Maybe the investigators "investigated" and made this determination. I don't get you guys, if the cops don't investigate, they get accused of "not doing anything" if they do investigate and come to a conclusion that doesn't set right with you guys, it's "unreal". Let them do their job, I'm sure they know what they're doing.

Why is this unreal? Okay, because only the Darby case has been solved. There are no suspects in the Springfield three case or the disappearances of Kenny and Hammond. Therefore how can ANYONE say they are not related? In the absence of a perpatraitor how the hell could anyone know if the same person was responsible for all of them??????????????????? So if they investigated as you seem to think they have, please explain how they could have came to such a conclusion with no suspects, no evidence and no witnesses? Let me know on that one. There has been NO new information on the girls from Springfield, Kenny or Hammond since the day they went missing. Unless investigators are keeping some smoking gun under wraps there is no way they can say these cases are unrelated.

kane7474 · 04-06-2009, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lorenhammond83

Rob (Angie's Boyfriend) did not do it. It is not feasible considering the minute amount of time he would have had to cover up the evidence before he reported the news of her disappearance. We need to out rule him completely as the police have done on multiple occasions and leave it that way.

I do believe are answers lie in the Clinton/Surrounding area and the persons involved are very close knit and most likely heavy drug users (rual Missouri so Meth is a good assumption). People know what happened and they are afraid of coming forward…

Please be our friend on MySpace and now Facebook to help spread awareness and to also get updates on Angie’s case.

www.myspace.com/angelamariehammond

http://www.facebook.com/people/angel...ond/1637589229

Tipsters may remain anonymous by emailing Angela’s family at angelamariehammond@gmail.com or by contacting the Clinton Police Department at (660) 885-2679 or tips@clintonmopd.com

Glad your on here, If you read through this entire thread you will see that anyone who has followed this case closely knows that Rob wasnt involved. Please look through our thread and let us know what you think of some of the ideas as to what may of happened. Do you think the men convicted of Trudy Darby's murder could have been involved? We would love to hear what you think.

TracyLynnS · 04-06-2009, 05:21 PM

OhReally,

From the official unsolved website, www.unsolved.com

"Rob turned around on the street and chased the pickup through downtown. But he didn't realize that when he threw his car into reverse, the transmission had been severely damaged."

TracyLynnS · 04-06-2009, 05:33 PM

This is an interesting bit from the article: One promising suspect from a nearby county had a pickup truck similar to the one associated with the abduction. But the owner had a solid alibi: He was under arrest in California at the time.

So a guy in a nearby county has a similar truck, but he was in jail in california when Angie went missing. I wonder who had the use of his truck while he was stuck in jail way out in california? Did the cops process the truck to see if there was evidence that it had been used to abduct Angie?

With the truck's owner out of state and in jail, it would be easy to take it and use it without his knowledge or consent. I sure hope the cops followed up on that.

Necco · 04-06-2009, 05:38 PM

I wonder if Unsolved Mysteries opted to depict Rob driving a car rather than a truck to make the perpetrator's truck stand out more.

That recent article did clear up at least thing people were questioning, why she was using a payphone (she didn't have a home phone).

crazytatsink · 04-07-2009, 12:18 AM

This was posted in the kansas city star ::

One promising suspect from a nearby county had a pickup truck similar to the one associated with the abduction. But the owner had a solid alibi: He was under arrest in California at the time.

Ok then where was his truck at the time of the abduction? When was he actually arrested? Does he fit the profile?

Juist thoughts!!!!

kane7474 · 04-07-2009, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazytatsink

This was posted in the kansas city star ::

One promising suspect from a nearby county had a pickup truck similar to the one associated with the abduction. But the owner had a solid alibi: He was under arrest in California at the time.

Ok then where was his truck at the time of the abduction? When was he actually arrested? Does he fit the profile?

Juist thoughts!!!!

There was a segment on our local news tonight about Angela. The lead in was that there was new information but actually nothing new was revealed. The investigator said again that somehow they know that Angela's abduction is not related to any other abductions that happened around the same time. Ofcourse no mention of how they now know this. He also stated that there was new evidence in the form of DNA that "might" produce a suspect. Go figure that one out.
Now about this story concerning someone in the area having a similar truck but being out of town. Is someone really trying to convince us that in the last 18 years this has never been looked into? The Clinton police, Henry County sherriffs and the FBI all overlooked this? This is highly suspect. During the unsolved mysteries episode it was said that over 1500 people with trucks matching the description where investigated and nothing turned up. Now all of a sudden we are considering that someone could have used someone elses truck?
Honestly I think that this case has been generating alot of attention lately and law enforcement in the area just wants to let everyone know they are still actively pursuing it. I don't think they have anything new whatsoever, I think they are just making a few headlines to show us they are still on the case. Ofcourse if this new evidence comes out maybe I will be proven wrong. Time will tell.

TracyLynnS · 04-07-2009, 11:46 AM

I can't imagine what this "new dna" evidence could be. If she scratched the attacker and managed to leave blood evidence behind, maybe smeared on the phone booth, you'd think that they would have said something about that by now.

It can't be something like a cigarette butt or a beer can left at the scene, because that could belong to anybody..

04-06-2009, 03:49 PM	#231
MegtheEgg86 Member Forum Veteran Join Date: Jun 19, 2008 Location: The Volunteer State Posts: 5,156	From the Star: She wasn’t there when her daughter was taken, but later, Cook watched an “Unsolved Mysteries” crew re-create the abduction. A very convincing actress played Angela Hammond. “That girl could scream,” Cook said I concur. That scream sounds like something out of a nightmare.
	__________________ "Why is she lying?, it makes me wonder. What is she hiding?, it makes me wonder." Go Vols!

04-07-2009, 12:18 AM	#238
crazytatsink Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Feb 28, 2009 Location: Arizona Posts: 50	hmmmm!!!! This was posted in the kansas city star :: One promising suspect from a nearby county had a pickup truck similar to the one associated with the abduction. But the owner had a solid alibi: He was under arrest in California at the time. Ok then where was his truck at the time of the abduction? When was he actually arrested? Does he fit the profile? Juist thoughts!!!!

04-06-2009, 10:11 AM	#228
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	I agree with crazytatsink. Why, nearly 20 years later, does this new article come out with such different information than what we've come to know as facts? For one thing, why was the boyfriend's vehicle changed from a car (as we have be told) to a truck that is almost identical to the kidnapper's vehicle? The article goes into a lot of detail on this point. If this was fact, from the beginning, wouldn't people close to the case have pointed that out?

04-06-2009, 05:21 PM	#235
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	OhReally, From the official unsolved website, www.unsolved.com "Rob turned around on the street and chased the pickup through downtown. But he didn't realize that when he threw his car into reverse, the transmission had been severely damaged."

04-06-2009, 05:33 PM	#236
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	This is an interesting bit from the article: One promising suspect from a nearby county had a pickup truck similar to the one associated with the abduction. But the owner had a solid alibi: He was under arrest in California at the time. So a guy in a nearby county has a similar truck, but he was in jail in california when Angie went missing. I wonder who had the use of his truck while he was stuck in jail way out in california? Did the cops process the truck to see if there was evidence that it had been used to abduct Angie? With the truck's owner out of state and in jail, it would be easy to take it and use it without his knowledge or consent. I sure hope the cops followed up on that.

04-06-2009, 05:38 PM	#237
Necco Member Senior Member Join Date: Jan 06, 2006 Posts: 1,149	I wonder if Unsolved Mysteries opted to depict Rob driving a car rather than a truck to make the perpetrator's truck stand out more. That recent article did clear up at least thing people were questioning, why she was using a payphone (she didn't have a home phone).

04-07-2009, 11:46 AM	#240
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	I can't imagine what this "new dna" evidence could be. If she scratched the attacker and managed to leave blood evidence behind, maybe smeared on the phone booth, you'd think that they would have said something about that by now. It can't be something like a cigarette butt or a beer can left at the scene, because that could belong to anybody..