Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant - Page 11 - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Corolla · 12-23-2007, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muppet Joe®

i dont know much about her but she seems a LOT more stable then Britney.

My dog is more stable than Britney.

catlover79 · 12-23-2007, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~NeonFire372~

My dog is more stable than Britney.

So are my cats, who really aren't that bright.

TripperFan · 12-26-2007, 05:25 PM

An interesting turn of events - who knows if it's a rumour or not - guess time will tell:

http://www.wwtdd.com/index.phtml?t=JAMIE+LYNN+SPEARS

EmoJoe · 12-26-2007, 05:45 PM

i'm 95% sure that isn't true...the article sounds completely made-up to me.

Cactus Jack · 12-26-2007, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muppet Joe®

i dont know much about her but she seems a LOT more stable then Britney.

My FLOOR is more stable than Britney.

Hollow · 12-26-2007, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripperFan

An interesting turn of events - who knows if it's a rumour or not - guess time will tell:

http://www.wwtdd.com/index.phtml?t=JAMIE+LYNN+SPEARS

bull****. "despite her claims"? she would know better than anyone else would. it would be a little different if it said that othr guy was POTENTIALLY the father, but it says THE father....that can't actually be proven until the child is born. lame, lame, lame.

Brieannas21 · 12-26-2007, 06:16 PM

No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me.

JMO

catlover79 · 12-26-2007, 06:20 PM

^ I agree 100%.

Nighthawk76 · 12-26-2007, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brieannas21

No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me.

JMO

I agree with you. A 16 year old having children is far from okay.

MsOrange · 12-26-2007, 06:28 PM

well of course it's not "okay" but it happens. People have to deal with it in the most mature way possible; while going to a magazine and telling our sob story to OK Magazine might not be OK for us, but we're not celebrities constantly being watched. Maybe Jamie was just trying to cut all the gossip off at the begining so that she could at least have a written record of the truth; and that so her young fans could at least see that she is taking responsiblity for her mistakes. JMO.

LuLu Rogers · 12-26-2007, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brieannas21

No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me.

JMO

I totally agree with you. A 16 year old girl is way too immature and irresponsible to have a child, hell a 16 year old is still a child herself!

waichingliu81 · 12-26-2007, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brieannas21

No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me.

JMO

there was a story last year i think or was it this year, cannot remember when a girl based in scotland, got pregnant at something like 11 years old. i'll try to find the story and the link on the web and post it afterwards

TripperFan · 12-26-2007, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by safety pin

bull****. "despite her claims"? she would know better than anyone else would. it would be a little different if it said that othr guy was POTENTIALLY the father, but it says THE father....that can't actually be proven until the child is born. lame, lame, lame.

You've misread it Sarah. "Despite her claims" doesn't necessarily mean that she didn't know in this case - they're insinuating that she's outright lying about who the father is and when she got pregnant. Right now, this producer and Jamie Lynn are obviously the only ones who know the truth (unless Jamie Lynn was bedding both the boyfriend and this guy ).

It's tough to say. In the "old" days of hollywood, handlers and studios would help cover up scandals. Could be with this, they figure the Spears family has had more than it's share of scandals this year and they're trying to cover this one the best they can. Could be paying off the boyfriend to go along and say he is the father.

I'm not saying I believe any of this story - I'm just posting what the latest is I saw on it.

Janice · 12-26-2007, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brieannas21

No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me.

JMO

I don't think anyone, here anyway, thinks it's okay for a 16-year old to get pregnant. What I'm seeing is a 'what's done is done' attitude, and wishing her the best in an unfortunate situation. There's a difference.

The magazine article non-issue/issue again. She's going to show the first pictures of her baby to OK mag, and get a million bucks in the process. Who turns down a million bucks. At that point, she'll be delirious with joy over her child and why not show the baby off. For all we know, she may state in the interview that is would have been wiser to wait to get pregnant, but things happen. I doubt she's going to tell other teens to go for it. I think most of us have at least a couple of family members who had a baby at 17 or even younger. It's part of life. She's not carrying the spawn of Satan here. She got pregnant by accident. She's human, and it's not the end of the world.

EmoJoe · 12-26-2007, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripperFan

You've misread it Sarah. "Despite her claims" doesn't necessarily mean that she didn't know in this case - they're insinuating that she's outright lying about who the father is and when she got pregnant. Right now, this producer and Jamie Lynn are obviously the only ones who know the truth (unless Jamie Lynn was bedding both the boyfriend and this guy ).

It's tough to say. In the "old" days of hollywood, handlers and studios would help cover up scandals. Could be with this, they figure the Spears family has had more than it's share of scandals this year and they're trying to cover this one the best they can. Could be paying off the boyfriend to go along and say he is the father.

I'm not saying I believe any of this story - I'm just posting what the latest is I saw on it.

i just really doubt Jamie Lynn went and had sex with a 40-year-old producer. it seems like the entire article is made-up.

12-26-2007, 05:25 PM	#153
TripperFan In God's Arms Now Forum Star Join Date: Sep 14, 2003 Location: Heartbreak Ridge Posts: 12,086	Interesting Turn of Events! An interesting turn of events - who knows if it's a rumour or not - guess time will tell: http://www.wwtdd.com/index.phtml?t=JAMIE+LYNN+SPEARS
	__________________ If I don't see you in this world, I'll meet you in the next one.....don't be late James Marshall Hendrix Voodoo Chile The Forum Legend formerly known as TripperFan "religion is for people who are afraid of hell--spirituality is for people who have been through hell"---anonymous

12-26-2007, 05:45 PM	#154
EmoJoe Cool cool cool Forum Addict Join Date: Apr 23, 2004 Location: New Jersey Posts: 71,478	i'm 95% sure that isn't true...the article sounds completely made-up to me.
	__________________ "I know the difference between TV and reality, Jeff. TV has structure, it makes sense, there are likable leading men. In real life, we have this. We have you." - Abed Nadir, Community www.sitcomsarestupid.blogspot.com

12-26-2007, 06:16 PM	#157
Brieannas21 Member Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 05, 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 9,792	No 16 yr old in this day in age should be having children, I do not see how some people find this ok. Especially since Jamie is in the public eye and little girls are looking up to her. Also, to take out an article in a magazine about the whole situation as if it is ok just baffles me. JMO

12-26-2007, 06:20 PM	#158
catlover79 God Bless Val Forum Addict Join Date: May 29, 2006 Location: Bewitched in Ohio Posts: 70,376	^ I agree 100%.

12-26-2007, 06:28 PM	#160
MsOrange Bringin' Sexy Back Forum Veteran Join Date: Dec 27, 2004 Posts: 6,133	well of course it's not "okay" but it happens. People have to deal with it in the most mature way possible; while going to a magazine and telling our sob story to OK Magazine might not be OK for us, but we're not celebrities constantly being watched. Maybe Jamie was just trying to cut all the gossip off at the begining so that she could at least have a written record of the truth; and that so her young fans could at least see that she is taking responsiblity for her mistakes. JMO.