pilotguy
12-21-2003, 10:22 PM
Here's a thought....
It's obvious that TV Land is going the way of NICK AT NITE by shoving aside older B&W shows of the 1950's and 60's to make room for more recent series of the 1970's, 80's and even 90's...only not as radically.
"Cheers", "All In The Family" and "Family Ties" will be leaving NICK and moving to TV Land starting the first of the year (actually, "Family Ties" left NICK months ago).
I was thinking...Do you think that "Wings" would be better served and showcased on TV Land instead of NICK?
It just seems to me that "Wings" has the classic style of writing and characters that TV Land has the reputation for....much more so than the current NICK AT NITE.
I'd like your thoughts on this....I could really see "Wings" fitting right in with the other TV Land series and possibly be more of an asset THERE than on NICK. (Even though both TV Land and NICK are owned by the same company, there DOES seem to be a definite "image" difference between the two cable networks!).
It's obvious that TV Land is going the way of NICK AT NITE by shoving aside older B&W shows of the 1950's and 60's to make room for more recent series of the 1970's, 80's and even 90's...only not as radically.
"Cheers", "All In The Family" and "Family Ties" will be leaving NICK and moving to TV Land starting the first of the year (actually, "Family Ties" left NICK months ago).
I was thinking...Do you think that "Wings" would be better served and showcased on TV Land instead of NICK?
It just seems to me that "Wings" has the classic style of writing and characters that TV Land has the reputation for....much more so than the current NICK AT NITE.
I'd like your thoughts on this....I could really see "Wings" fitting right in with the other TV Land series and possibly be more of an asset THERE than on NICK. (Even though both TV Land and NICK are owned by the same company, there DOES seem to be a definite "image" difference between the two cable networks!).