TVFactFan
10-26-2003, 04:57 PM
Just when i thought the Vikings was a serious team, they lose to the 2-4 Giants. I gave the giants o chance of winning this game and they surprised the hell out of me
|
View Full Version : Minnesota lost to the GIANTS??????? TVFactFan 10-26-2003, 04:57 PM Just when i thought the Vikings was a serious team, they lose to the 2-4 Giants. I gave the giants o chance of winning this game and they surprised the hell out of me Brian Damage 10-26-2003, 11:01 PM :clap: That's the way I expected the Giants to play all year long. Eddie Haskell 10-27-2003, 02:05 AM Overconfidence can sure get you in a lot of trouble. Everybody gains on the Cowboys. :) jekouptown 10-27-2003, 10:37 AM I told you .....kansas city is the best team in football....!!! i can spot a fake(vikings) when i see one. sinatrastar 10-27-2003, 11:09 AM The vikings always lose to the Giants, no worries. TVFactFan 10-27-2003, 07:58 PM Originally posted by jekouptown I told you .....kansas city is the best team in football....!!! i can spot a fake(vikings) when i see one. KC is not the best team in the NFl, they just have the best record. We don't find out who the best team is until January Eddie Haskell 10-28-2003, 01:37 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer KC is not the best team in the NFl, they just have the best record. We don't find out who the best team is until January Actually, that's not true at all. If you watch football on a weekly basis, you can pretty much tell who the best team in the NFL is. Being a Patriots fan, I'd like to say they are the best but it just isn't true....they have a fine defense but the offense needs a lot of work. At this time there is no doubt who is the best team in football and that team is the Chiefs. Mr. Television 10-28-2003, 01:39 AM KC might be the best team in football now but it doesn't mean they will be the best team in January. Eddie Haskell 10-28-2003, 02:18 AM Originally posted by mr roper KC might be the best team in football now but it doesn't mean they will be the best team in January. True.......in the NFL, injuries are always a huge factor. I mean, how many sports actually have a weekly injury report in the local newspapers? Just the NFL as far asI know. Mr. Television 10-28-2003, 02:54 AM Originally posted by Eddie Haskell True.......in the NFL, injuries are always a huge factor. I mean, how many sports actually have a weekly injury report in the local newspapers? Just the NFL as far asI know. What I find amusing is ESPN's top 10 NFL poll. Someone should tell them this isn't College Football. jekouptown 10-28-2003, 11:04 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer KC is not the best team in the NFl, they just have the best record. We don't find out who the best team is until January STATISTICS SHOW THAT YOUR WRONG. AS OF TODAY...OCTOBER 28TH,2003......THE KANSAS CITY CHIEFS "BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL" wickthayer 10-28-2003, 01:11 PM The question is who is the best team in football, not who will be the best team. The answer to the question is the Chiefs. Feel free to start a who will win the super bowl contest if you want to argue about the future. TVFactFan 10-28-2003, 07:09 PM Originally posted by jekouptown STATISTICS SHOW THAT YOUR WRONG. AS OF TODAY...OCTOBER 28TH,2003......THE KANSAS CITY CHIEFS "BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL" KC has not played every team in the NFL in a do or die game so they are NOT THE BEST TEAM. Eddie Haskell 10-29-2003, 03:37 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer KC has not played every team in the NFL in a do or die game so they are NOT THE BEST TEAM. Seeing as each team has only played either 7 or 8 games to this date, using your theory, there is NO best team in the NFL. I think I'll go with common sense.....The Chiefs are the best team. wickthayer 10-29-2003, 10:15 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer KC has not played every team in the NFL in a do or die game so they are NOT THE BEST TEAM. No team ever does this, what is your point? They are the best team, everyone else has lost. They may not win another game but as of right now they are the tops. TVFactFan 10-29-2003, 08:37 PM Originally posted by wickthayer No team ever does this, what is your point? They are the best team, everyone else has lost. They may not win another game but as of right now they are the tops. Top Record that's it. Not best team wickthayer 10-30-2003, 10:25 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer Top Record that's it. Not best team They are the best right now, your standard for judging the best in in your imagination only, the NFL never has every team play every other team in a do or die situation. Lets see, how is home field advantage determined, BEST RECORD, dont be afraid of commitment, they are the best team as the season stands today. EricIdlefan 11-10-2003, 10:04 AM Minnesota lost to the Chargers 42-28 thanks to Flutie!! TVFactFan 11-10-2003, 10:07 AM Originally posted by EricIdlefan Minnesota lost to the Chargers 42-28 thanks to Flutie!! Minnesota is not going anywhere-THEY ARE A FRAUD EricIdlefan 11-11-2003, 02:58 PM Ever since they got rid of Denny Green, the Vikings haven't been the same!! isiahthomas 12-01-2003, 01:56 PM LOL@Minnesota losing to San Diego hahahahahahahahahaha. Minnesota lost to St Louis last night 48-17. Minnesota is a joke. They suck on the road & they always have. If they want people to take them seriously, they're gonna have to start being a better road team. TVFactFan 12-01-2003, 03:45 PM Originally posted by isiahthomas LOL@Minnesota losing to San Diego hahahahahahahahahaha. Minnesota lost to St Louis last night 48-17. Minnesota is a joke. They suck on the road & they always have. If they want people to take them seriously, they're gonna have to start being a better road team. I told a Minnesota Fan on this board that the Vikings are a Fraud and they were actually asking me whY??-LOL EricIdlefan 12-18-2003, 04:24 PM Fossel is out of New York!!! TVFactFan 12-18-2003, 06:55 PM Originally posted by EricIdlefan Fossel is out of New York!!! It was time for him to go-he was a bad coach. Eddie Haskell 12-19-2003, 07:01 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer he was a bad coach. He wasn't a bad coach; he was a very good X's and O's guy, he just wasn't able to motivate the players any longer. It's a shame because the players of today make so much money yet they still need someone to motivate them. The Pro players of today are a bunch of babies who don't realize how good they have it. EricIdlefan 12-19-2003, 04:33 PM It wouldn't surprise me if he landed in another team at all!! TVFactFan 12-19-2003, 09:10 PM Originally posted by Eddie Haskell He wasn't a bad coach; he was a very good X's and O's guy, he just wasn't able to motivate the players any longer. It's a shame because the players of today make so much money yet they still need someone to motivate them. The Pro players of today are a bunch of babies who don't realize how good they have it. He was afraid to take risks and that's why he was fired. THE END Brian Damage 12-19-2003, 09:12 PM He wasn't a bad coach though....THE END ******* TVFactFan 12-19-2003, 09:23 PM Originally posted by Brian Damage He wasn't a bad coach though....THE END ******* He's not a bad coach? Let me see, he was at the Linc playing the Eagles and just recovered a fumble and could not get the first down on 3rd. So instead of going for it on 4th and goal to possibly jum on a hot Eagles team early, that fool decides to kick a FG and goes up 3-0 and the Eagles scored and never looked back. BAD COACHING!!!!! Brian Damage 12-19-2003, 09:25 PM He's not a bad coach *******. He's the third winningest coach in Giants history! passionsfan79 12-19-2003, 09:26 PM sitcom just thinks hes knows everything but he dont TVFactFan 12-19-2003, 09:30 PM Originally posted by americandreamsfan03 sitcom just thinks hes knows everything but he dont Well he was fired for a reason Brian Damage 12-20-2003, 12:43 PM He wasn't fired because he was a bad coach, he was fired because the players just weren't responding to him anymore. Now Ray Handley, that was a BAD coach. TVFactFan 12-20-2003, 12:51 PM Originally posted by Brian Damage He wasn't fired because he was a bad coach, he was fired because the players just weren't responding to him anymore. Now Ray Handley, that was a BAD coach. And plus he was already on THIN ICE for losing a 38-17 lead in a wildcard game against the niners Brian Damage 12-20-2003, 01:02 PM I do think that was the catalyst to this. TVFactFan 12-20-2003, 01:05 PM Originally posted by Brian Damage I do think that was the catalyst to this. It sure was. This organzation expected to be in the Superbowl this season. Not 4-10 Brian Damage 12-20-2003, 01:09 PM agreed Eddie Haskell 12-24-2003, 09:23 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer He was afraid to take risks and that's why he was fired. THE END THE END?? What does that mean? sinatrastar 12-24-2003, 01:18 PM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer It sure was. This organzation expected to be in the Superbowl this season. Not 4-10 Then they had lost touch with reality. TVFactFan 12-24-2003, 02:00 PM Originally posted by Eddie Haskell THE END?? What does that mean? End of discussion Eddie Haskell 12-25-2003, 03:03 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer End of discussion Ignorant TVFactFan 12-25-2003, 11:01 AM Originally posted by Eddie Haskell Ignorant I'm not sure I know What you mean? Eddie Haskell 12-26-2003, 07:11 AM Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer I'm not sure I know What you mean? :lol: :wave: |