The Rams have made a good run to reach .500 but since there are only 2 wildcards in the NFC, it will be harder because the Rams will not win their remaining 6 games. So i think the Rams finalrecord will be 9-7. The key reason they won't make the playoffs is because the Falcons and Saints will win atleast 10 or more and most likely will have the final two spots.

Even though they might not make the playoffs, at least their division has some competetion unlike the NFC North:

Green Bay 8-2
Detroit 3-7
Minnesota 3-7
Chicago 2-8

Sad, isn't it?

Originally posted by ILoveLucyfan4eva
Even though they might not make the playoffs, at least their division has some competetion unlike the NFC North:

Green Bay 8-2
Detroit 3-7
Minnesota 3-7
Chicago 2-8

Sad, isn't it?

I have to admit I thought that division would be a lot more competitive

Originally posted by briandamage
I have to admit I thought that division would be a lot more competitive

Yeah I did too, Chicago was actually pretty good last year.

Originally posted by ILoveLucyfan4eva


Yeah I did too, Chicago was actually pretty good last year.

The Bears were not good-80% of the Games they won last year were by luck and it showed in the playoffs against the Eagles. It's also showing this year. The Bears were overrated last year and have a goofy quarterback-Jim Miller. The Bears are where they belong-the bottom of the division.

Originally posted by CableTV Guy
The Bears were not good-80% of the Games they won last year were by luck and it showed in the playoffs against the Eagles. It's also showing this year. The Bears were overrated last year and have a goofy quarterback-Jim Miller. The Bears are where they belong-the bottom of the division.

I have no problem with Chicago being at the bottom of the division but they still made it to the playoffs last year, whether they got there by luck or not. I was just saying that I didn't expect there to be such a huge gap between the first and second place teams.