FOL-FAN-ITA
09-30-2025, 06:22 AM
Hi guys. I recently found a very interesting detail about the Ropers spinoff.
As you know, ABC contractually promised Fell that, if the spinoff flopped in a year, he would have come back to TC. I've always believed that both Fell and Lindley, as a couple, had this clause on their contracts. But I was wrong.
Here's a pic of an article available on Google News that addressed the cancellation of the Ropers at the beginning of the 80s. Only Fell had that clause, Audra did not make request. So, after the spinoff went off the air, only Roper would have come back on the original set, Mrs. Roper would have been written out I believe, given the different kind of contract they had.
As much as i miss the Ropers during the later years, I think they made the right decision. The Ropers worked well because they were a bickering pair, remove one of them and things would have turned out differently.
What do you think?
By the way, I'm Italian, sorry for my not so perfect English :lol:
As you know, ABC contractually promised Fell that, if the spinoff flopped in a year, he would have come back to TC. I've always believed that both Fell and Lindley, as a couple, had this clause on their contracts. But I was wrong.
Here's a pic of an article available on Google News that addressed the cancellation of the Ropers at the beginning of the 80s. Only Fell had that clause, Audra did not make request. So, after the spinoff went off the air, only Roper would have come back on the original set, Mrs. Roper would have been written out I believe, given the different kind of contract they had.
As much as i miss the Ropers during the later years, I think they made the right decision. The Ropers worked well because they were a bickering pair, remove one of them and things would have turned out differently.
What do you think?
By the way, I'm Italian, sorry for my not so perfect English :lol: