View Full Version : How come the Ropers couldn't still go to the Reagle Beagle every once in a while?


TVFactFan
10-16-2002, 02:34 PM
I know the Reagle Beagle was a hangout on three's company but the trio didn't have to be in there when the Ropers stopped in for a drink. They could have even taken their new neighbors and sit in the booth. I know the beagle wouldn't have been considered far because the Trio went to visit the Ropers.

callmetootie
10-16-2002, 04:34 PM
Well...think about it. The Ropers never went to the Regal Beagle THAT much, and since they're even farther away....they probably went even more sparingly.

jerry allen
10-16-2002, 09:00 PM
:) the trio rode their bikes or took a cab didn't they? they didn't even own a car! yet Stanley owned a jalopy and i'm sure deep down he knew that he didn't want to make any trips too far. also, i can't picture Jeffrey Brooks sitting at a table with the Ropers! Jeffrey was too good for that. it would've been nice if the Ropers and the Brooks' recreated their roles for "Three's A Crowd" and have The Ropers, Jeffrey and Ann Brooks, and Vicki's parents all in the same scene! who would've been the more pompous? James Bradford or Jeffrey Brooks?