Time for me to come out about myself. I am actually Asexual and Aromantic, meaning I'm not interested romantically or sexually to ANYBODY. A for Asexual and Aromantic really needs to be added to the LGBTQT List.

Time for me to come out about myself. I am actually Asexual and Aromantic, meaning I'm not interested romantically or sexually to ANYBODY. A for Asexual and Aromantic really needs to be added to the LGBTQT List.

:):)

I'm happy for you.:thumbsup:

I don't see how it should be added to the LGBT list as a protected class.

I mean, how is being asexual different (legally) from a heterosexual person who simply cannot find a partner? What rights do asexuals have to fight for that are different from being a hetero single person?

I don't see how it should be added to the LGBT list as a protected class.

I mean, how is being asexual different (legally) from a heterosexual person who simply cannot find a partner? What rights do asexuals have to fight for that are different from being a hetero single person?


The right to sarcasm?

I mean, how is being asexual different (legally) from a heterosexual person who simply cannot find a partner?

I think that is a good question, the same thought occurred to me. But what about women who either physically or emotionally cannot accommodate a man, yet is unattracted to women?

I'm trying to maintain a family-friendly decorum with the words "physically or emotionally incapable"...feel free to assume a literal interpretation.

People like that do exist, and probably does qualify as a "disability".