TMC
06-03-2021, 06:46 PM
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/six-feet-under-alan-ball-b1857686.html
Alan Ball's five-season HBO drama was unprecedented when it debuted on June 3, 2001. "Like most of us, television has always tended to shy away from death," says Louis Chilton. "Of course, it has featured on TV since the medium’s earliest days – as a storytelling device, a set-up for a mystery, a story twist or even a convenient means of explaining an actor’s departure. But for the better part of a century, TV skirted around the edges of death, avoiding the unknowable black hole at the heart of it. Perhaps the 20th century’s finest example was Twin Peaks, which shocked the world in 1990 with its raw, protracted look at the murder of a teenage girl, diving into a community’s grief without offering any easy or coherent answers. But in 2001, Six Feet Under blew all precedents away. When it comes to exploring death on-screen, there has never been a better, funnier, more humanistic example than Six Feet Under, first broadcast 20 years ago today. Of all the conservative media taboos that Alan Ball’s pioneering TV drama would flout – and there were a lot of them, from meth-smoking schoolkids to gay threesomes to mass shootings – none was more challenging to the “feelgood” conventions of television than its candid, no-holds-barred treatment of death. Six Feet Under was a series that looked death square in the face, scrutinizing every mole and crevice." Ball says of Six Feet Under, which won nine Emmys and three Golden Globes: “I feel like what the show is about is pretty timeless. There had never really been a show like that, about that subject. About death.”
ALSO:
Alan Ball recalls initially hating the idea for Six Feet Under's ending (https://collider.com/six-feet-under-finale-season-6-plans-alan-ball-interview/): "Certainly, the idea of killing everybody at the end of the show was not my own," he says. "And I remember I fought it, when I thought it was just like we were just being nihilistic in terms of like, 'Oh, whatever...' Because I think it was pitched as there was a nuclear strike in Los Angeles, and I was like, 'No, we're not going to do that.' But then once I realized, as we were talking about it around the table, that, no, we're just going to make a point of being with each of these characters at the moment when they stop living, I sort of went, 'Well, of course, how else could you end this show? That's the perfect way to end this show.'"
Michael C. Hall expected Six Feet Under to be one of TV's memorable shows (https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/ny-michael-c-hall-six-feet-under-20210603-ezam5jugg5aujajgjl3vatrtn4-story.html): “I’m not … like a super shiny happy optimistic person,” he says. “By that I mean I don’t think I feel that way generally about everything I’m involved with. ... It wasn’t just intuition, it was based on the script and what I felt like we were making, that this could be something special.”
Read Entertainment Weekly's Six Feet Under oral history (https://ew.com/tv/tv-reunions/six-feet-under-hbo-20th-anniversary/)
Read Rolling Stone's Six Feet Under oral history from 2015 (https://www.rollingstone.com/feature/six-feet-under-hbo-oral-history-160927/)
Rachel Griffiths has more sympathy for her Six Feet Under character 20 years after the show's debut (https://www.salon.com/2021/06/03/six-feet-under-20th-anniversary-rachel-griffiths/)
"It was always hard for me to just understand this girl's inability to get s*** done," Griffiths says of Brenda Chenowith, her Six Feet Under alter ego. "I kept trying to find jobs for her where she could actually function in the world. To me, she just seemed like an anomaly. I didn't know many women in my life, young women, who were so talented and smart, and so trapped in their own neuroticism." But with hindsight, Griffiths wonders if Brenda helped pave the way for more nuanced TV portrayals of women. "From watching television, I think she would say, 'Thank Christ we are getting closer to actually far more accurate portrayals of what women feel like in themselves, and in their bodies, and what they struggle with and, and a more inclusive notion of what woman is, you know, including non-binary trends,'" she says. "I think she would love this movement to self-definition...And television's a lot more interesting too! There's a lot more good s*** on television."
HBO gave Alan Ball one note for Six Feet Under: "Could you make the whole thing more (f***ed) up?" (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/04/arts/television/six-feet-under-20th-anniversary.html)
Ball complied with the HBO note by making Rachel Griffiths' Brenda, initially written as a milquetoast girlfriend, a far more complex partner and foil to Nate Fisher. Ball, however, did push back on HBO's request to cast a movie star as the Fisher family patriarch, who dies in the opening scene. Ball managed to convince HBO that the character actor Richard Jenkins was right for the role, assuaging their concerns by casting Griffiths, who had recently been nominated for an Oscar for Hilary and Jackie.
Alan Ball's five-season HBO drama was unprecedented when it debuted on June 3, 2001. "Like most of us, television has always tended to shy away from death," says Louis Chilton. "Of course, it has featured on TV since the medium’s earliest days – as a storytelling device, a set-up for a mystery, a story twist or even a convenient means of explaining an actor’s departure. But for the better part of a century, TV skirted around the edges of death, avoiding the unknowable black hole at the heart of it. Perhaps the 20th century’s finest example was Twin Peaks, which shocked the world in 1990 with its raw, protracted look at the murder of a teenage girl, diving into a community’s grief without offering any easy or coherent answers. But in 2001, Six Feet Under blew all precedents away. When it comes to exploring death on-screen, there has never been a better, funnier, more humanistic example than Six Feet Under, first broadcast 20 years ago today. Of all the conservative media taboos that Alan Ball’s pioneering TV drama would flout – and there were a lot of them, from meth-smoking schoolkids to gay threesomes to mass shootings – none was more challenging to the “feelgood” conventions of television than its candid, no-holds-barred treatment of death. Six Feet Under was a series that looked death square in the face, scrutinizing every mole and crevice." Ball says of Six Feet Under, which won nine Emmys and three Golden Globes: “I feel like what the show is about is pretty timeless. There had never really been a show like that, about that subject. About death.”
ALSO:
Alan Ball recalls initially hating the idea for Six Feet Under's ending (https://collider.com/six-feet-under-finale-season-6-plans-alan-ball-interview/): "Certainly, the idea of killing everybody at the end of the show was not my own," he says. "And I remember I fought it, when I thought it was just like we were just being nihilistic in terms of like, 'Oh, whatever...' Because I think it was pitched as there was a nuclear strike in Los Angeles, and I was like, 'No, we're not going to do that.' But then once I realized, as we were talking about it around the table, that, no, we're just going to make a point of being with each of these characters at the moment when they stop living, I sort of went, 'Well, of course, how else could you end this show? That's the perfect way to end this show.'"
Michael C. Hall expected Six Feet Under to be one of TV's memorable shows (https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/ny-michael-c-hall-six-feet-under-20210603-ezam5jugg5aujajgjl3vatrtn4-story.html): “I’m not … like a super shiny happy optimistic person,” he says. “By that I mean I don’t think I feel that way generally about everything I’m involved with. ... It wasn’t just intuition, it was based on the script and what I felt like we were making, that this could be something special.”
Read Entertainment Weekly's Six Feet Under oral history (https://ew.com/tv/tv-reunions/six-feet-under-hbo-20th-anniversary/)
Read Rolling Stone's Six Feet Under oral history from 2015 (https://www.rollingstone.com/feature/six-feet-under-hbo-oral-history-160927/)
Rachel Griffiths has more sympathy for her Six Feet Under character 20 years after the show's debut (https://www.salon.com/2021/06/03/six-feet-under-20th-anniversary-rachel-griffiths/)
"It was always hard for me to just understand this girl's inability to get s*** done," Griffiths says of Brenda Chenowith, her Six Feet Under alter ego. "I kept trying to find jobs for her where she could actually function in the world. To me, she just seemed like an anomaly. I didn't know many women in my life, young women, who were so talented and smart, and so trapped in their own neuroticism." But with hindsight, Griffiths wonders if Brenda helped pave the way for more nuanced TV portrayals of women. "From watching television, I think she would say, 'Thank Christ we are getting closer to actually far more accurate portrayals of what women feel like in themselves, and in their bodies, and what they struggle with and, and a more inclusive notion of what woman is, you know, including non-binary trends,'" she says. "I think she would love this movement to self-definition...And television's a lot more interesting too! There's a lot more good s*** on television."
HBO gave Alan Ball one note for Six Feet Under: "Could you make the whole thing more (f***ed) up?" (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/04/arts/television/six-feet-under-20th-anniversary.html)
Ball complied with the HBO note by making Rachel Griffiths' Brenda, initially written as a milquetoast girlfriend, a far more complex partner and foil to Nate Fisher. Ball, however, did push back on HBO's request to cast a movie star as the Fisher family patriarch, who dies in the opening scene. Ball managed to convince HBO that the character actor Richard Jenkins was right for the role, assuaging their concerns by casting Griffiths, who had recently been nominated for an Oscar for Hilary and Jackie.