TMC
10-18-2018, 01:49 AM
...a premise and reason to exist beyond nostalgia
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/17/arts/television/review-the-conners-abc.html
"'Family moves on after a death' is a trusty sitcom premise (that’s the way they all became the Brady Bunch)," says James Poniewozik. "But to have the loss be someone the audience has known as long and as well as family is a challenge, and an opportunity." He adds of killing Roseanne Conner via an opioid overdose: "If anything, the decision was a compliment to the legacy of her creation, a show that at its best was about facing real problems — death, domestic abuse, unemployment — with tough love and acid humor. Besides, we already knew what really killed Roseanne Conner: Roseanne Barr’s racism. The meta-cause for the character’s absence couldn’t help but hang over the Conners premiere. And in a way, Roseanne’s ejection was a kind of refutation of the premise of the earlier Roseanne revival. The revival made the case, in part, that families could have deep, hurtful divisions over the election and the state of America but that, in the end, these were just politics. (This has also been a theme of the new, more conciliatory episodes of Last Man Standing on Fox.) That was nice to hear, but it wasn’t totally honest. It took the example of the real-life Barr to point out that the schisms in America right now aren’t just about politics, in the sense of marginal tax rates or health care policy. They’re also about decency and empathy and dehumanization."
ALSO:
The Conners works without Roseanne Conner -- so did it need her in the first place? (https://www.theringer.com/tv/2018/10/17/17990710/the-conners-roseanne-spinoff-premiere)
One could barely call The Conners a spinoff -- it's the exact same show as the last season of Roseanne, minus the one cast member (https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/10/the-conners-roseanne-abc-first-episode/573232/)
Callous as it may sound, the sooner Roseanne is forgotten, the better the show might become (https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/roseanne-overdosed-on-opioids-and-left-the-conners-behind-its-better-this-way/2018/10/16/d3b31aca-d196-11e8-8c22-fa2ef74bd6d6_story.html)
What it's like to watch The Conners having never seen Roseanne (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-conners-is-a-reboot-for-another-time-and-place_us_5bc72c6ae4b0a8f17ee80ab6?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067)
Sara Gilbert on Roseanne Conner's death (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/sara-gilbert-roseanne-julie-chens-talk-exit-1152476): "It's happened to people all over the world at some point in their journey. It redefines a family, and people have to take on different roles. That felt like the most authentic story we could tell and something people can relate to."
Michael Fishman wouldn't rule out bringing Roseanne Conner back in a flashback scene: "Never say never" (https://variety.com/2018/tv/news/roseanne-barr-flashback-the-conners-guest-appearance-michael-fishman-interview-1202982887/)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/17/arts/television/review-the-conners-abc.html
"'Family moves on after a death' is a trusty sitcom premise (that’s the way they all became the Brady Bunch)," says James Poniewozik. "But to have the loss be someone the audience has known as long and as well as family is a challenge, and an opportunity." He adds of killing Roseanne Conner via an opioid overdose: "If anything, the decision was a compliment to the legacy of her creation, a show that at its best was about facing real problems — death, domestic abuse, unemployment — with tough love and acid humor. Besides, we already knew what really killed Roseanne Conner: Roseanne Barr’s racism. The meta-cause for the character’s absence couldn’t help but hang over the Conners premiere. And in a way, Roseanne’s ejection was a kind of refutation of the premise of the earlier Roseanne revival. The revival made the case, in part, that families could have deep, hurtful divisions over the election and the state of America but that, in the end, these were just politics. (This has also been a theme of the new, more conciliatory episodes of Last Man Standing on Fox.) That was nice to hear, but it wasn’t totally honest. It took the example of the real-life Barr to point out that the schisms in America right now aren’t just about politics, in the sense of marginal tax rates or health care policy. They’re also about decency and empathy and dehumanization."
ALSO:
The Conners works without Roseanne Conner -- so did it need her in the first place? (https://www.theringer.com/tv/2018/10/17/17990710/the-conners-roseanne-spinoff-premiere)
One could barely call The Conners a spinoff -- it's the exact same show as the last season of Roseanne, minus the one cast member (https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/10/the-conners-roseanne-abc-first-episode/573232/)
Callous as it may sound, the sooner Roseanne is forgotten, the better the show might become (https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/roseanne-overdosed-on-opioids-and-left-the-conners-behind-its-better-this-way/2018/10/16/d3b31aca-d196-11e8-8c22-fa2ef74bd6d6_story.html)
What it's like to watch The Conners having never seen Roseanne (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-conners-is-a-reboot-for-another-time-and-place_us_5bc72c6ae4b0a8f17ee80ab6?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067)
Sara Gilbert on Roseanne Conner's death (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/sara-gilbert-roseanne-julie-chens-talk-exit-1152476): "It's happened to people all over the world at some point in their journey. It redefines a family, and people have to take on different roles. That felt like the most authentic story we could tell and something people can relate to."
Michael Fishman wouldn't rule out bringing Roseanne Conner back in a flashback scene: "Never say never" (https://variety.com/2018/tv/news/roseanne-barr-flashback-the-conners-guest-appearance-michael-fishman-interview-1202982887/)