I hope she addresses this. It doesn't take away from what she went through, but it's awfully hypocritical that she didn't award this sick monster's victim the same benefit that she does for herself and for other Harvey Weinstein victims.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLvn1LwUIAEG-fT.jpg:large

Link to the article where she praised him: Rose McGowan: My Life Is Like 'The L Word' | Advocate.com (https://www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/features/2011/08/11/rose-mcgowan-my-life-l-word)

Her actions towards his molestation accusations, that have been proven as fact, is just as much the issue at hand as the men who stayed quiet about her rape.

I won't accept her not addressing this issue. You don't get to call out the men who ignored your pain, when you blatantly ignored and stated "its none of my business" towards children that were proven to have been raped by older men.

Hollywood is full of hypocrites.

I don't know where that excerpt was cut-and-pasted from, but it seems like they are trying to put words in her mouth and take what she said completely out of context; what she said was that she didn't know what happened and that she had had a positive experience with him, and more importantly she said that such understanding was "not her business" - which is completely different from implying that something is "none of my business" - she was saying that she is an actress not a psychologist, and not capable of analyzing someone's social awkwardness or what lay behind it.

I don't know if the commenter just has poor comprehension skills or if their intent was malicious, but the result is the same.

I don't know where that excerpt was cut-and-pasted from, but it seems like they are trying to put words in her mouth and take what she said completely out of context; what she said was that she didn't know what happened and that she had had a positive experience with him, and more importantly she said that such understanding was "not her business" - which is completely different from implying that something is "none of my business" - she was saying that she is an actress not a psychologist, and not capable of analyzing someone's social awkwardness or what lay behind it.

I don't know if the commenter just has poor comprehension skills or if their intent was malicious, but the result is the same.


No, if you read what she says, she said it was none of her business presumably because the molestation didn't happen to her and she likes the guy. So if Victor Salva being a convicted child molester is none of her business, then why is her allegations of rape against Harvey Weinstein Matt Damon's or Ben Affleck's business?

I of course think it's everyone's business because these sleazy show business people think they have the right to decide what's best for the world even though they are some of the most ignorant people on Earth.