View Full Version : 9/11 Remembered (Oct 2002)


Foggy
09-11-2016, 11:50 AM
This was brought out in Oct 2002. It has several pictures throughout and the song "Only Time" (played 3 times). The pictures capture a little of what happen that day, some are hard to watch, but it was our reality....OUR PEARL HARBOR

Takes over 10 minutes to watch

http://www.gcfl.net/911/remember911.php


Dedicated to the men, women and children who lost their lives;
all those who sacrificed their lives;
And to all the Heroes that responded to the emergency
11 September 2001

katsung47
09-14-2016, 06:20 PM
W.T.C. demolished by mini nuke. That's why there are so many cancer victims right now.

3 years ago, when A.G. Eric Holder was going to put so said 911 mastermind on trial in New York, I wrote this.

Why select New York? (3/18/2013).

Several years after 911 attack, people were rattled by unusual cancer case among first responders of ground zero. They started to think the WTC were pulled down by mini nukes.

"35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
Thursday, July 02, 2009

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
.....

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html"

"China Syndrome at the WTC

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/chinasyn.html"

Then cancer caused death rapidly rose. 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

"9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale?

April 4, 2011 By Daily Mail Reporter

A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises?in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.

Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has reportedly said that cancer cases across ‘all ranks?of the FDNY who worked at Ground Zero are ‘up significantly?

It is thought that the report ?due to be officially disclosed in time for the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in September ?cites unusual rises in leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.

‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.?

The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/911-nuke-demolition-proof-firefighters-radiation-cancers-off-the-scale/"

Now you should understand why Eric Holder announced to put "911 mastermind K.S.Mohammed " on trial in New York" in 2009. It was used to justify an "Al Qaida revenge attack for trial of their leader". The planned attack was a nuclear one, so they could blame the cancer were caused by Al Qaida terror attack. The purpose is to cover up the truth that in 911 attack, mini nukes were used. The similar tactic has been tried in 2007, when a B-52 flied over US continental with 6 loaded nuke missiles. New York must have been the target of these nuclear missiles. Of course, mainstream media beat the drum on 911 Master-mind trial but rarely report the unusual cancer deaths of the first responders of ground zero. Because that would expose who was the real Master-mind of 911 ?Al Qaida has no nuclear bomb.

Dude111
09-18-2016, 01:55 AM
W.T.C. demolished by mini nuke.Indeed!!!

Bombs placed @ certain points in the towers! (I have a video some guy made where you can hear them going off @ the base of each MINUTES BEFORE THEY FALL!!)

katsung47
09-30-2016, 08:52 PM
European Physicists, US and Canadian Architects, Engineers: WTC 9/11 was controlled demolition

September 11, 2016 Darius Shahtahmasebi

European physicists, architects, and engineers have joined US physicists, architects, and engineers who have investigated the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers and found the evidence points to destruction by controlled demolition, not airplane strikes.

“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST [U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology] reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”

Entitled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” the investigation was conducted by Steven Jones, a former professor of physics at Brigham Young University; Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada and a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute of Canada; Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer; and Ted Walter, author of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s Beyond Misinformation: “What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7.”

http://theantimedia.org/physicists-twin-towers-controlled-demolition-911/

Dude111
10-01-2016, 05:14 AM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlQjPOksaR8

Babalu
10-05-2016, 06:42 PM
W.T.C. demolished by mini nuke. That's why there are so many cancer victims right now.

3 years ago, when A.G. Eric Holder was going to put so said 911 mastermind on trial in New York, I wrote this.

Why select New York? (3/18/2013).

Several years after 911 attack, people were rattled by unusual cancer case among first responders of ground zero. They started to think the WTC were pulled down by mini nukes.





Then cancer caused death rapidly rose. 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.



Now you should understand why Eric Holder announced to put "911 mastermind K.S.Mohammed " on trial in New York" in 2009. It was used to justify an "Al Qaida revenge attack for trial of their leader". The planned attack was a nuclear one, so they could blame the cancer were caused by Al Qaida terror attack. The purpose is to cover up the truth that in 911 attack, mini nukes were used. The similar tactic has been tried in 2007, when a B-52 flied over US continental with 6 loaded nuke missiles. New York must have been the target of these nuclear missiles. Of course, mainstream media beat the drum on 911 Master-mind trial but rarely report the unusual cancer deaths of the first responders of ground zero. Because that would expose who was the real Master-mind of 911 ?Al Qaida has no nuclear bomb.

Pure stupidity.

D-Dey
10-05-2016, 09:49 PM
European Physicists, US and Canadian Architects, Engineers: WTC 9/11 was controlled demolition
Phony "physicists" who work for cult leaders and con-artists who have an anti-American agenda.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlQjPOksaR8
Seriously? No-planers are dumber than your average gullible 9/11 twoof-cult sheep members.

Dude111
10-08-2016, 10:10 PM
Where is all the plane evidence then??

NO PEOPLE WHO BLINDLY BELIEVE THIS BS ARE THE STUPID ONES!!


Why isnt this thread on the political base?

D-Dey
10-09-2016, 01:22 AM
Where is all the plane evidence then???
Plenty of it right here.


https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=world+trade+center+plane+debris&id=80FFE03825719EC3BBD5920157BF7855C0240EC3&FORM=IQFRBA

NO PEOPLE WHO BLINDLY BELIEVE THIS BS ARE THE STUPID ONES!!
Yes, people who blindly believe there were no planes, as well as those who deny that hijacked planes were used as kamikaze weapons on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and attempted to use one of them on Capitol Hill are the stupid ones.


Bombs placed @ certain points in the towers! (I have a video some guy made where you can hear them going off @ the base of each MINUTES BEFORE THEY FALL!!)
Which is a total FRAUD, because the towers fell from where the planes hit them!

Dude111
10-09-2016, 02:00 PM
IM SORRY BUT THE BUILDING WOULD NOT FALL FROM A PLANE HITTING THEM NEAR THE TOP!!!!!

Both towers had explosives planted @ the base as well as other parts.... WHY NOT TRY WATCHING THE VIDEO I POSTED!!

D-Dey
10-09-2016, 02:21 PM
IM SORRY BUT THE BUILDING WOULD NOT FALL FROM A PLANE HITTING THEM NEAR THE TOP!!!!!

Both towers had explosives planted @ the base as well as other parts.... WHY NOT TRY WATCHING THE VIDEO I POSTED!!
It wasn't near the top, and a few random explosions at the bottom had nothing to with the collapse of the towers. Not all explosions are caused by bombs, no matter what these moronic videos tell you. Structural damage and massive fires from the collision of the planes caused them to collapse.

And any video claiming there were no planes is flat out idiotic.

Dude111
10-09-2016, 03:38 PM
http://s19.postimg.org/a6ma7kdhf/Damage_plane_bird.jpg

D-Dey
10-09-2016, 04:18 PM
http://s19.postimg.org/a6ma7kdhf/Damage_plane_bird.jpg
This is a load of crap, and I'm laughing at the SO-CALLED "9/11 truth" cults for believing such garbage.

A little hint for you; Skyscrapers aren't birds.

Dude111
10-09-2016, 11:21 PM
NO THEY ARE MUCH STRONGER THAN BIRDS!!!!!

People who dont like this country BELIEVE THIS BS!!!!!!!


PEOPLE WHO LOVE IT ARE NOT TAKEN IN BY THIS CRAP!!

D-Dey
10-10-2016, 10:44 PM
NO THEY ARE MUCH STRONGER THAN BIRDS!!!!!

People who dont like this country BELIEVE THIS BS!!!!!!!


PEOPLE WHO LOVE IT ARE NOT TAKEN IN BY THIS CRAP!!
No, people who love this country aren't taken in by YOUR crap! Skyscrapers are also larger than birds as well as most planes. The Twin Towers were larger than a 767, but only by a couple of dozen feet on each side. So therefore it is not impossible for planes to go through them especially when the planes are being rammed through them at between 450 and 600 mph, which means that poster IS A LOAD OF CRAP!

Dude111
10-11-2016, 01:21 PM
Yes which is why the poster IS CORRECT BUD!!!!!

The building should not have given way.. THE PLANE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DESTROYED ON IMPACT,NOT DISSAPEAR INTO THE BLDG!!


ITS ALL BS!!!!!!!!!

D-Dey
10-12-2016, 05:21 PM
Yes which is why the poster IS CORRECT BUD!!!!!

The building should not have given way,.. THE PLANE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DESTROYED ON IMPACT,NOT DISSAPEAR INTO THE BLDG!!


ITS ALL BS!!!!!!!!!
The poster is NOT correct, because it did NOT disappear into the building. It plowed THROUGH the building (both of them in fact) and landed on the streets and the buildings below causing the structural damage and the fires that lead to their collapse. The lies of the SO-CALLED "9/11 truth" factions are what's BS!


"An aluminum tube wouldn't cut through a steel building." What a dumbass the maker of that video is. That "aluminum tube" had a steel skeleton, was loaded with jet fuel, and had two jet engines on the wings.

Dude111
10-12-2016, 09:22 PM
Im not trying to make ya mad D-DEY...... I think me and Mr. Munster ended up in an argument and I dunno if he visits the site anymore and I feel bad.... If I had a chance I would tell him I was sorry........

katsung47
10-17-2016, 08:00 PM
11.09.2016 Andrey Fursov

According to media reports, in the evening, another passenger plane crashed into one of the wings of the Pentagon in Washington.

Then the investigation ran into a number of problems with this plane, since its fragments and the remains of the passengers were not found, and the hole in the wall was considerably smaller than the aircraft's wings.

This is not the only oddity to be found in the the Twin Towers’ destruction.

The official number of people killed is 2,843. In New York, there was enormous destruction, but in the midst of everything was a completely unharmed car with a Quran and the hijackers’ passports in pristine condition.

More at:

http://katehon.com/article/911-what-really-happened

D-Dey
10-19-2016, 08:02 PM
11.09.2016 Andrey Fursov

According to media reports, in the evening, another passenger plane crashed into one of the wings of the Pentagon in Washington.

Then the investigation ran into a number of problems with this plane, since its fragments and the remains of the passengers were not found, and the hole in the wall was considerably smaller than the aircraft's wings.
That's a complete lie, like everything else in "WhatWeWantYouToThinkReallyHappened.con-job."


http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=File:Pentcomposite.jpg

http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=Pentagon_evidence