View Full Version : Dan Snyder is more considered a dislikable person instead...


irehtman
08-28-2015, 07:44 AM
Dan Snyder is current NFL team owner and was being too supportive on his franchised QB than his current head coach. What you don't that even Dan cannot get be removed at all, Dan is considered too much of a subordinate type of NFL team owner, especially when he first starting owning this current NFL team since 1997 in a hurry, when his predecessor died back then.

That's the better reason why his franchised QB is become dislikable somehow right now, and now you should know that Dan is supposed to become more a dislikable NFL team owner, which is worser than his dislikable franchise QB.

irehtman
08-29-2015, 06:28 PM
But here's the comparison between Jack Kent Cooke and Dan Snyder:

Jack Kent Cooke:

- Pro: An experienced NFL team owner who led his NFL team into winning 3 out of 5 Super Bowls, which is considered a little bit over the average.

- Con: He has bad historical timeline of his marriages and his NFL team should have known the truth about it, back then when he died, rather than struggle very badly afterwards.

Dan Snyder:

- Pro: He has no marriage problems in his life.

- Con: He is more of a businessman than being a real NFL team owner and he is more supportive on his own importance rather than his own entire NFL team.

isiahthomas
09-15-2015, 03:56 PM
Irehtman, how many times am I gonna have this talk with you about Dan Snyder isn't the reason the Redskins suck? Hahahahahahahahahaha. You keep talking about he's a terrible owner and the team sucks because of him. Dan isn't the one that's playing on the field every Sunday. The Redskins players are the ones to blame for them being terrible because they're not doing their jobs. If the players do their jobs, the team will win. It's that simple and the fans will be happy again. Dan and the general manager's job is to get players who will help the team win. I do think that the Redskins made a mistake giving up a few draft picks to get Robert Griffin because he hasn't done well in awhile and he's been hurt too much. He'll probably be gone after this season. The Redskins gotta play St.Louis this weekend and they're gonna lose again in front of their home crowd LOL. Starting off at 0-2 isn't gonna be good. They better hope they don't dig themselves a deep hole by going 0-4 or 0-5 because if that happens, they can forget about making the playoffs. I don't think they'll make the playoffs anyway and they'll probably be at the bottom of their division LOL.

irehtman
09-15-2015, 06:33 PM
Irehtman, how many times am I gonna have this talk with you about Dan Snyder isn't the reason the Redskins suck? Hahahahahahahahahaha. You keep talking about he's a terrible owner and the team sucks because of him. Dan isn't the one that's playing on the field every Sunday. The Redskins players are the ones to blame for them being terrible because they're not doing their jobs. If the players do their jobs, the team will win. It's that simple and the fans will be happy again. Dan and the general manager's job is to get players who will help the team win. I do think that the Redskins made a mistake giving up a few draft picks to get Robert Griffin because he hasn't done well in awhile and he's been hurt too much. He'll probably be gone after this season. The Redskins gotta play St.Louis this weekend and they're gonna lose again in front of their home crowd LOL. Starting off at 0-2 isn't gonna be good. They better hope they don't dig themselves a deep hole by going 0-4 or 0-5 because if that happens, they can forget about making the playoffs. I don't think they'll make the playoffs anyway and they'll probably be at the bottom of their division LOL.

I know he does not play on the field, but the Redskins are having a hard time doing their jobs properly is because Dan has NO NFL team owning skills at all, while owning the Redskins. The Redskins members noticed what's wrong Dan Snyder, since he took over took quick, and so does the entire NFL public. The Redskins already know what happened before Dan took over too quick also, but they need some low publicity by confirming to accept and handle the truth.

Isiahthomas, I know you don't like the Redskins at all, but don't get involved with the Redskins anymore since you insist being a Redskins-hater.

I also know we are forbidden to remove Dan right now, but even if you don't like Gruden, we also do not hate nor remove him also.

The reason why the Redskins are having a hard time doing their own jobs because of Dan Snyder's no NFL-team-owning-technique skills, nothing else, on the bottom line.

isiahthomas
09-23-2015, 03:32 PM
Yeah right LOL. Keep making excuses and blaming Dan Snyder for their problems. Redskins finally got a win last week against St.Louis which was a surprise. I'll see what they do tomorrow against the Giants. They'll probably lose LOL.

irehtman
09-23-2015, 05:24 PM
You wish, isiahthomas...

isiahthomas
09-24-2015, 01:42 PM
The Redskins aren't going anywhere and they aren't making the playoffs. I'm gonna laugh at you tomorrow when the Redskins lose tonight LOL.

irehtman
09-24-2015, 03:27 PM
Well, how about if you check how much amount of laugh you have between tomorrow until the end of the postseason?

isiahthomas
09-24-2015, 03:34 PM
Yeah right hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Once again you're rambling as usual and not making sense LOL.

irehtman
09-24-2015, 10:45 PM
You may have won this week, isiah. But, your laugh may or may not be having enough equal amount for the rest of this season yet.

isiahthomas
09-28-2015, 02:38 PM
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I told you the Redskins were gonna lose LOL. They're gonna lose this week against Philadelphia LOL.

EricIdlefan
09-28-2015, 09:20 PM
There are indeed pros and cons to both owners. You are right!

irehtman
09-29-2015, 12:31 PM
The "lose" may not be really that major yet, isiahthomas.

But why don't you continue laughing on Dan Snyder permanently instead?