TMC
03-26-2014, 04:37 PM
http://www.411mania.com/movies/columns/317212/Ask-411-Movies-for-03.24.14:-Jumping-the-Shark-Regularly-Since-Leonard-Left.htm
2) Sad to say, I have not seen Oz, but everyone I know who has watched it, enjoys it. It is one of many shows I plan on watching at some point. Six Feet Under and Big Love are on that list as well. But I can answer your question. I perused several sites and most seem to agree that Oz is not "underrated" necessarily, but does deserve to be mentioned alongside the best shows of all-time. So why isn't it? Well, I read an article by someone who loves Oz and they stated that until The Sopranos aired in 1999, HBO had not yet figured out how to properly market this style of smart storytelling to the public.
The fact is, The Sopranos stole the thunder from Oz in a big way. It was able to accomplish this because of HBO putting its full attention into marketing it, plus the public has always had an infatuation with the mafia. Not everyone has a comparable infatuation with hardened prisoners, especially when it is not a prison reminiscent of a Frank Darabont offering (The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile). The consensus of the writer I came across seems to be that The Sopranos is escapist entertainment and because people would rather be Tony Soprano than someone in prison, people connected to it better. I also read on a few sites that the highs in Oz were not as high as those in The Sopranos and its lows were worse than those in The Sopranos. But that's just what I read. I can't say until I see the show for myself. But where The Sopranos gets credit for establishing the anti-hero and a specific mode of storytelling, many feel that honor should go to Oz, which got there earlier.
2) Sad to say, I have not seen Oz, but everyone I know who has watched it, enjoys it. It is one of many shows I plan on watching at some point. Six Feet Under and Big Love are on that list as well. But I can answer your question. I perused several sites and most seem to agree that Oz is not "underrated" necessarily, but does deserve to be mentioned alongside the best shows of all-time. So why isn't it? Well, I read an article by someone who loves Oz and they stated that until The Sopranos aired in 1999, HBO had not yet figured out how to properly market this style of smart storytelling to the public.
The fact is, The Sopranos stole the thunder from Oz in a big way. It was able to accomplish this because of HBO putting its full attention into marketing it, plus the public has always had an infatuation with the mafia. Not everyone has a comparable infatuation with hardened prisoners, especially when it is not a prison reminiscent of a Frank Darabont offering (The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile). The consensus of the writer I came across seems to be that The Sopranos is escapist entertainment and because people would rather be Tony Soprano than someone in prison, people connected to it better. I also read on a few sites that the highs in Oz were not as high as those in The Sopranos and its lows were worse than those in The Sopranos. But that's just what I read. I can't say until I see the show for myself. But where The Sopranos gets credit for establishing the anti-hero and a specific mode of storytelling, many feel that honor should go to Oz, which got there earlier.