http://www.wewantinsanity.com/am2/publish/Peter_Dawson/When_Good_Shows_Go_Bad_Star_Trek.shtml

So back in January I criticized the Battlestar Galactica re-imagining for having a lousy ending. I also mentioned how Ron Moore wrote for Star Trek: The Next Generation, a show that went from crap to quality, and some people thought I'd somehow implied the show was the pinnacle of sci-fi. Star Trek is not the pinnacle of sci-fi. I really don't know what I'd call the pinnacle, but it wouldn't be Battlestar Galactica and it wouldn't be Star Trek. However, I will state that both are significant touchstones in the realm of sci-fi, with each exploring important concepts. Also, nothing is sacred. Case in point, this article. - See more at: http://www.wewantinsanity.com/am2/publish/Peter_Dawson/When_Good_Shows_Go_Bad_Star_Trek.shtml#sthash.YYVgLMI9.dpuf