Yong Fang
05-01-2013, 06:15 PM
From this article:
http://tv.yahoo.com/news/utah-nbc-affiliate-pulls-gory-hannibal-tv-show-183856383.html
The NBC affiliate in Salt Lake City, Utah has decided not to air an NBC show called "Hannibal", the second show they are censoring after a sitcom called "The New Normal".
My question is, why does the affiliate have the right to unilaterally take off programming from the network? It has always seemed to me that the affiliates are like franchises to the parent network.
If I owned a McDonalds somewhere in the USA, I am tied to an agreement with the company to sell their products. The franchise cannot unilaterally say "We will no longer sell Big Macs here.", or sell additional products. Why aren't the affiliates held to the same standard?
This reminds me once in the 1990's when I was poor, renting a room and one of my only pleasures (besides the new internet) was watching TV. On Mondays, the CBS affiliate would show King of Queens, Raymond, and Becker. Some of my favorite shows.
The stupid CBS affiliate PRE-EMPTED these shows to have a fundraiser for some charity! Pre-empted as in, they were going to broadcast these shows AFTER Letterman! I was :mad: . (Again, around 1997, there was no DVR, internet like now, no Hulu, no real other source legal or otherwise to watch my programming).
I called the station angry and we ended up having a few choice words (on both ends). I ended up calling them morons for taking off several Top 10 shows for their local thing, something I am sure most people avoided that night. Imagine now, if you wanting to watch "Big Bang Theory" and it just wasn't on because of your affiliate.
A much older story is when my ABC affiliate in Memphis (as a child) refused to show the first several episodes of "Soap" replacing it with "Gomer Pyle USMC" (of all things, headlined by a gay actor that everyone knew was gay in 1968.) Soon however, my "Bible Belt" town had a fit and SOAP came back on (and was one of the best sitcoms of all time.) This was, 1978? In '78, most of us still had three channels, no internet, no DVD's, Netflix or whatever. 'Sorry, cannot watch this show because Bible thumpers are too dumb or too vouryistic (sic!) to turn off the television!
Note, your job as a network affiliate is to show network programming. If you do not like the shows, do not be an affiliate and let some other company step in!
The New Normal and Hannibal has no interest to me, but the Salt Lake City affiliate are a bunch of tools. But again, the wonderful thing about 2013 is that I do not need them to watch my programming. But it still annoys me no end when they do this, and do not understand why the national networks do not hold these affiliates to a tighter contract and no pre-emption of programming.
So why?
http://tv.yahoo.com/news/utah-nbc-affiliate-pulls-gory-hannibal-tv-show-183856383.html
The NBC affiliate in Salt Lake City, Utah has decided not to air an NBC show called "Hannibal", the second show they are censoring after a sitcom called "The New Normal".
My question is, why does the affiliate have the right to unilaterally take off programming from the network? It has always seemed to me that the affiliates are like franchises to the parent network.
If I owned a McDonalds somewhere in the USA, I am tied to an agreement with the company to sell their products. The franchise cannot unilaterally say "We will no longer sell Big Macs here.", or sell additional products. Why aren't the affiliates held to the same standard?
This reminds me once in the 1990's when I was poor, renting a room and one of my only pleasures (besides the new internet) was watching TV. On Mondays, the CBS affiliate would show King of Queens, Raymond, and Becker. Some of my favorite shows.
The stupid CBS affiliate PRE-EMPTED these shows to have a fundraiser for some charity! Pre-empted as in, they were going to broadcast these shows AFTER Letterman! I was :mad: . (Again, around 1997, there was no DVR, internet like now, no Hulu, no real other source legal or otherwise to watch my programming).
I called the station angry and we ended up having a few choice words (on both ends). I ended up calling them morons for taking off several Top 10 shows for their local thing, something I am sure most people avoided that night. Imagine now, if you wanting to watch "Big Bang Theory" and it just wasn't on because of your affiliate.
A much older story is when my ABC affiliate in Memphis (as a child) refused to show the first several episodes of "Soap" replacing it with "Gomer Pyle USMC" (of all things, headlined by a gay actor that everyone knew was gay in 1968.) Soon however, my "Bible Belt" town had a fit and SOAP came back on (and was one of the best sitcoms of all time.) This was, 1978? In '78, most of us still had three channels, no internet, no DVD's, Netflix or whatever. 'Sorry, cannot watch this show because Bible thumpers are too dumb or too vouryistic (sic!) to turn off the television!
Note, your job as a network affiliate is to show network programming. If you do not like the shows, do not be an affiliate and let some other company step in!
The New Normal and Hannibal has no interest to me, but the Salt Lake City affiliate are a bunch of tools. But again, the wonderful thing about 2013 is that I do not need them to watch my programming. But it still annoys me no end when they do this, and do not understand why the national networks do not hold these affiliates to a tighter contract and no pre-emption of programming.
So why?