View Full Version : Could Hugh Grant Been A Better Replacement For Charlie Sheen on 'Two & A Half Men?'


Brian Damage
05-27-2012, 11:16 PM
http://static.igossip.com/photos_2/may_2011/hugh_grant_two_half_men.jpg

Around this time last year, it was revealed that former A-List movie star Hugh Grant was *this* close to replacing Charlie Sheen on Two And A Half Men. Obviously that fell through and Ashton Kutcher signed on. Looking back at this past season. How do you think Grant would have done instead? Better? Worse? The Same?

hawkeye123
05-28-2012, 02:08 AM
I would of liked to see John Stamos.

Schmoopie
05-28-2012, 03:51 AM
I would have watched it for Hugh Grant!

ryan423
05-28-2012, 12:09 PM
I would of liked to see John Stamos.

John and Hugh are both great, but it essentially would have been the same show they were doing with Charlie. In the latter half of season 9, the writers have figured out Walden (Kutcher), and the show is getting better again. Plus, the direction they've gone has allowed the show to mature a bit. It's more about the relationships between Walden and Zoey and Alan and Lyndsey, and I've enjoyed that.

yankeesrj12
05-28-2012, 01:05 PM
I think Hugh Grant is one of the most annoying actors on the planet (behind Will Smith) so I would not have watched.

hawkeye123
05-28-2012, 11:23 PM
I still haven't saw it with Ashton yet.I'm sure it's still funny.I mean he was great in that the 70's show.But i loved the show with Charlie.