JamesG
07-27-2011, 01:55 PM
Top 20 Worst Summer Blockbusters
July 26, 2011
20. The Last Airbender (2010)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/the-last-airbender-Blu-ray.jpg
Winner of five Golden Raspberry Awards and the ire of hundreds of thousands of fans of the original Nickelodeon animated series "Avatar: The Last Airbender", M. Night Shyamalan's 3D travesty might prove to be the nail in his directorial coffin (but, knowing Hollywood, probably not).
Although distributor Paramount Pictures spent nearly $130 million in marketing alone, scathing reviews kept audiences largely at bay. Complaints centered on bad dialogue, bad acting, a confusing plot, and poor use of tacked-on 3D, making an already dark film practically unseeable in parts.
The Sun Times' Roger Ebert summarized the critical response best when he wrote, "'The Last Airbender' is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here."
19. Knight and Day (2010)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/Knight-And-Day-2010-Dutch-Front-Cover-44712.jpg
Despite impressively combining many summer movie tropes — explosions, mysterious secret agents, a multiplicity of plot twists, technological nonsense, a huge star and a pretty girl — Knight and Day did not inspire any of the excitement normally associated with blockbusters.
Perhaps it was the absence of any spark, comedic or a romantic, between the two leads: as Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz run through everywhere from desert islands to Austrian cities, the dialogue becomes increasingly banal.
Yet even though the film only grossed $76.4 million domestically, it killed at the international box office (some reports attributing this to a relatively wide China release).
18. Hudson Hawk (1991)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/Hudson_Hawk_dvd_cover.jpg
Although it was undeniably a Bruce Willis vanity project, Hudson Hawk's tale of a charming cat burglar-turned pawn-turned unlikely hero isn't nearly as terrible as reviews might indicate.
The problem was that most critics interpreted the flick as a spectacularly boring attempt at box-office excitement — likely influenced by Willis' success in two, action-packed Die Hard films — when it was probably never supposed to be particularly high-octane.
Instead, Hawk is more of a smart-ass riff on spy movies starring the ultimate smartass (just look at Bruce Willis's smirk), a mute David Caruso, Andie McDowell as a nun and Sandra Bernhard and Richard E. Grant as oddball billionaires.
In a classic case of too-high expectations, Hawk bombed at the box office with just over $17 million U.S. gross.
17. The Avengers (1998)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/the-avengers-movie-dvd.jpg
Even James Bond himself couldn't muster enough secret agent nostalgia to save this droll adaptation of the 1960s British television show.
When mad scientist Sean Connery tries to rule the world by controlling its weather, stylish British agents Emma Peel (a lithe Uma Thurman) and John Steed (Ralph Fiennes) snap into rather sluggish action.
Fans of the original series claimed that the movie stumbled in misunderstanding its British heritage, but worldwide audiences simply found it boring.
Owing to bad early reviews, the film only grossed $49 million against a $60 million budget.
16. Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/transformers-dark-of-the-moon-poster1_107329.jpg
Like its predecessors, the third Transformers film is loud, explosive, and somewhat satisfying in a hate-yourself-to-admit it kind of way.
Director Michael Bay and screenwriter Ehren Kruger obviously took note of the criticism heaped upon the second film — namely that the storyline was confusing if not incomprehensible — and responded by having characters restate the central plot points in scene after scene.
That is, until the second half of the movie, which is composed of one long, endless, loud, quick cutting, fireball-filled action sequence. At some point, the spectacle fades and exhaustion sets in.
Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune called the movie "A work of ineffable soullessness and persistent moral idiocy."
As of July 21 the film has made $303 million.
15. Stealth (2005)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/displaymedia-3.jpg
Starring the beautiful Jessica Biel, a fresh off of an Oscar win Jaime Foxx, and Josh "that guy" Lucas, Stealth had no reason to be this bad, especially with proven action film director Rob Cohen (xXx and The Fast and the Furious) at the helm.
But for some reason the "artificial-intelligence stealth fighter jet" fanboys did not come out in full force: with a $135 million budget, the total worldwide gross was an astoundingly-low $77 million.
It couldn't even excite Stephen Hunter, the Washington Post's military and gun-obsessed film critic, who wrote, "It's not new. It's not interesting. I wish it would go away."
14. The Haunting (1999)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/haunt8.jpg
The original 1963 horror film is regarded as a genre classic and regularly appears on "Scariest Films of All Time" lists.
The 1999 remake, directed by Jan de Bont (then, of Speed and Speed 2: Cruise Control fame) and starring Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Owen Wilson, could not recapture any of the original's fright.
Despite the star-studded cast, audiences were reportedly reduced to laughter at the overuse of horror cliches and not quite believable special effects. All of the subtle ambiguity over whether main character Eleanor (played in this version by Lili Taylor) is haunted or insane is written out of this version.
The film grossed over $175 million against an $80 million budget, but garnered almost no positive reviews.
13. Howard the Duck (1986)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/howardtheduck.jpg
Howard the Duck is based on a cult satirical Marvel comic from the 1970s. In the source material, Howard is an anthropomorphic and ornery misfit in an otherwise ordinary world.
From that well regarded, if minor, source material, producer George Lucas (seriously, did he just lose all his mojo after coming up with the story for the Indiana Jones films?) and director Willard Huyck created one of the most hated characters of all time.
Howard is a live-action duck played by several actors in animatronic suits, and there is not a single person who thought it looked good.
Audiences simply could not connect with the creepy main character (or the light hint of sexual tension with star Lea Thompson), resulting in an impressively low gross of $37.9 million.
12. Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/speed_two_2_dvd_sandra_bullock_jason_patric.jpg
Speed was a surprise hit, but it shouldn't have been: Keanu Reeves, Sandra Bullock, and a bus wired to explode if it slowed down made for a surprisingly compelling summer flick.
Yet despite Speed director Jan de Bont's reported insistence that there was no potential for a sequel, 20th Century Fox disagreed. What resulted was a painfully generic action movie that featured a slow moving cruise ship on a collision course with an oil tanker.
Reeves stayed away from the production and was replaced by Jason Patric. Not only did the film lack a compelling leading man, but the villain was also worse than in the first movie: Willem Dafoe paled in comparison to Dennis Hopper's bombastic terrorist mastermind.
11. Green Lantern (2011)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/961c2e709511fdca3611fd0f54021467.jpg
Though criticism of this movie was all over the place (some thought it a cluttered mess, others a derivative cash-grab), but the general consensus was that Ryan Reynolds' verdant hero just could not deliver the same magic as more well-known heroes like Batman.
What may be a familiar storyline to comic book geeks and fanboys fell flat with the general public.
(Also, where's the fun in a superhero that has no vulnerabilities? Through his magic ring, Green Lantern Hal Jordan can summon any object he thinks of. Like Superman without the allegorical subtext.)
Although Green Lantern is supposed to be a thrilling origin-story, most felt there was too much of a focus on special effects and not enough effort put into explaining why anyone should care about the characters.
As of July 21, the film still had not made back its $200 million budget.
10. Pearl Harbor (2001)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/PDIS_D23889D.jpg
Coming off the Bruce Willis/Ben Affleck Armageddon, director Michael Bay was primed for another big summer hit.
So, you know, why not combine one of the greatest tragedies in U.S. history with leaden dialogue, a lame love triangle and one of the stars from your last flick?
In the July 2011 issue of GQ, K.C. Hodenfield, an assistant director on several Bay films, recalled that the initial idea was to give Pearl Harbor a different feel.
"Michael was saying he was going to go about this movie differently — This was going to be like a classic movie ... By lunchtime, we're making a Michael Bay movie, in the Michael Bay style."
As with all of the auteur's films, however, the film made plenty of money. It grossed nearly $450 million against a $140 million budget.
July 26, 2011
20. The Last Airbender (2010)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/the-last-airbender-Blu-ray.jpg
Winner of five Golden Raspberry Awards and the ire of hundreds of thousands of fans of the original Nickelodeon animated series "Avatar: The Last Airbender", M. Night Shyamalan's 3D travesty might prove to be the nail in his directorial coffin (but, knowing Hollywood, probably not).
Although distributor Paramount Pictures spent nearly $130 million in marketing alone, scathing reviews kept audiences largely at bay. Complaints centered on bad dialogue, bad acting, a confusing plot, and poor use of tacked-on 3D, making an already dark film practically unseeable in parts.
The Sun Times' Roger Ebert summarized the critical response best when he wrote, "'The Last Airbender' is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here."
19. Knight and Day (2010)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/Knight-And-Day-2010-Dutch-Front-Cover-44712.jpg
Despite impressively combining many summer movie tropes — explosions, mysterious secret agents, a multiplicity of plot twists, technological nonsense, a huge star and a pretty girl — Knight and Day did not inspire any of the excitement normally associated with blockbusters.
Perhaps it was the absence of any spark, comedic or a romantic, between the two leads: as Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz run through everywhere from desert islands to Austrian cities, the dialogue becomes increasingly banal.
Yet even though the film only grossed $76.4 million domestically, it killed at the international box office (some reports attributing this to a relatively wide China release).
18. Hudson Hawk (1991)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/Hudson_Hawk_dvd_cover.jpg
Although it was undeniably a Bruce Willis vanity project, Hudson Hawk's tale of a charming cat burglar-turned pawn-turned unlikely hero isn't nearly as terrible as reviews might indicate.
The problem was that most critics interpreted the flick as a spectacularly boring attempt at box-office excitement — likely influenced by Willis' success in two, action-packed Die Hard films — when it was probably never supposed to be particularly high-octane.
Instead, Hawk is more of a smart-ass riff on spy movies starring the ultimate smartass (just look at Bruce Willis's smirk), a mute David Caruso, Andie McDowell as a nun and Sandra Bernhard and Richard E. Grant as oddball billionaires.
In a classic case of too-high expectations, Hawk bombed at the box office with just over $17 million U.S. gross.
17. The Avengers (1998)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/the-avengers-movie-dvd.jpg
Even James Bond himself couldn't muster enough secret agent nostalgia to save this droll adaptation of the 1960s British television show.
When mad scientist Sean Connery tries to rule the world by controlling its weather, stylish British agents Emma Peel (a lithe Uma Thurman) and John Steed (Ralph Fiennes) snap into rather sluggish action.
Fans of the original series claimed that the movie stumbled in misunderstanding its British heritage, but worldwide audiences simply found it boring.
Owing to bad early reviews, the film only grossed $49 million against a $60 million budget.
16. Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/transformers-dark-of-the-moon-poster1_107329.jpg
Like its predecessors, the third Transformers film is loud, explosive, and somewhat satisfying in a hate-yourself-to-admit it kind of way.
Director Michael Bay and screenwriter Ehren Kruger obviously took note of the criticism heaped upon the second film — namely that the storyline was confusing if not incomprehensible — and responded by having characters restate the central plot points in scene after scene.
That is, until the second half of the movie, which is composed of one long, endless, loud, quick cutting, fireball-filled action sequence. At some point, the spectacle fades and exhaustion sets in.
Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune called the movie "A work of ineffable soullessness and persistent moral idiocy."
As of July 21 the film has made $303 million.
15. Stealth (2005)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/displaymedia-3.jpg
Starring the beautiful Jessica Biel, a fresh off of an Oscar win Jaime Foxx, and Josh "that guy" Lucas, Stealth had no reason to be this bad, especially with proven action film director Rob Cohen (xXx and The Fast and the Furious) at the helm.
But for some reason the "artificial-intelligence stealth fighter jet" fanboys did not come out in full force: with a $135 million budget, the total worldwide gross was an astoundingly-low $77 million.
It couldn't even excite Stephen Hunter, the Washington Post's military and gun-obsessed film critic, who wrote, "It's not new. It's not interesting. I wish it would go away."
14. The Haunting (1999)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/haunt8.jpg
The original 1963 horror film is regarded as a genre classic and regularly appears on "Scariest Films of All Time" lists.
The 1999 remake, directed by Jan de Bont (then, of Speed and Speed 2: Cruise Control fame) and starring Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Owen Wilson, could not recapture any of the original's fright.
Despite the star-studded cast, audiences were reportedly reduced to laughter at the overuse of horror cliches and not quite believable special effects. All of the subtle ambiguity over whether main character Eleanor (played in this version by Lili Taylor) is haunted or insane is written out of this version.
The film grossed over $175 million against an $80 million budget, but garnered almost no positive reviews.
13. Howard the Duck (1986)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/howardtheduck.jpg
Howard the Duck is based on a cult satirical Marvel comic from the 1970s. In the source material, Howard is an anthropomorphic and ornery misfit in an otherwise ordinary world.
From that well regarded, if minor, source material, producer George Lucas (seriously, did he just lose all his mojo after coming up with the story for the Indiana Jones films?) and director Willard Huyck created one of the most hated characters of all time.
Howard is a live-action duck played by several actors in animatronic suits, and there is not a single person who thought it looked good.
Audiences simply could not connect with the creepy main character (or the light hint of sexual tension with star Lea Thompson), resulting in an impressively low gross of $37.9 million.
12. Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/speed_two_2_dvd_sandra_bullock_jason_patric.jpg
Speed was a surprise hit, but it shouldn't have been: Keanu Reeves, Sandra Bullock, and a bus wired to explode if it slowed down made for a surprisingly compelling summer flick.
Yet despite Speed director Jan de Bont's reported insistence that there was no potential for a sequel, 20th Century Fox disagreed. What resulted was a painfully generic action movie that featured a slow moving cruise ship on a collision course with an oil tanker.
Reeves stayed away from the production and was replaced by Jason Patric. Not only did the film lack a compelling leading man, but the villain was also worse than in the first movie: Willem Dafoe paled in comparison to Dennis Hopper's bombastic terrorist mastermind.
11. Green Lantern (2011)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/961c2e709511fdca3611fd0f54021467.jpg
Though criticism of this movie was all over the place (some thought it a cluttered mess, others a derivative cash-grab), but the general consensus was that Ryan Reynolds' verdant hero just could not deliver the same magic as more well-known heroes like Batman.
What may be a familiar storyline to comic book geeks and fanboys fell flat with the general public.
(Also, where's the fun in a superhero that has no vulnerabilities? Through his magic ring, Green Lantern Hal Jordan can summon any object he thinks of. Like Superman without the allegorical subtext.)
Although Green Lantern is supposed to be a thrilling origin-story, most felt there was too much of a focus on special effects and not enough effort put into explaining why anyone should care about the characters.
As of July 21, the film still had not made back its $200 million budget.
10. Pearl Harbor (2001)
http://i879.photobucket.com/albums/ab358/JamesGrec1/PDIS_D23889D.jpg
Coming off the Bruce Willis/Ben Affleck Armageddon, director Michael Bay was primed for another big summer hit.
So, you know, why not combine one of the greatest tragedies in U.S. history with leaden dialogue, a lame love triangle and one of the stars from your last flick?
In the July 2011 issue of GQ, K.C. Hodenfield, an assistant director on several Bay films, recalled that the initial idea was to give Pearl Harbor a different feel.
"Michael was saying he was going to go about this movie differently — This was going to be like a classic movie ... By lunchtime, we're making a Michael Bay movie, in the Michael Bay style."
As with all of the auteur's films, however, the film made plenty of money. It grossed nearly $450 million against a $140 million budget.