RobbieG
12-13-2010, 04:47 PM
As a viewer who likes the earlier seasons of Three's Company (love the Ropers more than Mr. Furley, despite how great I think Don Knotts is) and MASH (love Henry, Trapper, and Frank more than their replacements, and like the humor more when Larry Gelbart and Laurence Marks were more directly involved in writing the episodes), I have long noticed that TV Land's programming tends to favor the later seasons of these shows and had concluded that whoever controls the programming at TV Land must be biased in favor of the later seasons of these shows. It always seems like when MASH wraps back to the early years, its airtime is reduced, and the same with Three's Company.
Up until last week, TV Land was airing one hour of Three's Company and TWO hours of MASH late at night. Three's Company had moved into the Mr. Furley episodes and last week MASH wrapped back to the beginning, so I jokingly said to myself that it must be time for TV Land to expand Three's Company to two hours and reduce MASH to one hour. I thought I was just being paranoid, but lo and behold, it really actually happened this week! Three's Company has been expanded to two hours and MASH has been reduced to one hour. Plus, TV Land found a way to reduce the Sunday evening MASH block by airing a Hot in Cleveland special. They always seem to trot out the specials on Sunday evenings when MASH is in the early seasons.
Also, I don't understand why Sanford and Son and Bonanza get such huge blocks of airtime. I guess it's cheaper for TV Land to run one show for three or four hours than to have to pay for a few more classic shows that could run in some of those slots. This channel has really gone downhill.
Hallmark Channel didn't expand and contract the MASH airtime exactly when MASH was in the later and earlier seasons, respectively. They did change the air times a lot but the changes didn't seem to coincide with the switches between Henry/Trapper/Frank and Potter/BJ/Charles. It didn't seem like whoever controls programming at Hallmark was changing the programming just to suit their own personal preferences of some seasons over others.
I used to think it was my imagination that TV Land was biased against certain seasons of these shows, but I'm not so sure it is just my imagination anymore. I don't think whoever controls TV Land's programming should be allowed to have their personal biases to affect programming at the viewers' expense, but it sure looks like they really do. It's just another example of why this channel is unreliable and inconsistent in providing classic television to viewers.
Robbie
Up until last week, TV Land was airing one hour of Three's Company and TWO hours of MASH late at night. Three's Company had moved into the Mr. Furley episodes and last week MASH wrapped back to the beginning, so I jokingly said to myself that it must be time for TV Land to expand Three's Company to two hours and reduce MASH to one hour. I thought I was just being paranoid, but lo and behold, it really actually happened this week! Three's Company has been expanded to two hours and MASH has been reduced to one hour. Plus, TV Land found a way to reduce the Sunday evening MASH block by airing a Hot in Cleveland special. They always seem to trot out the specials on Sunday evenings when MASH is in the early seasons.
Also, I don't understand why Sanford and Son and Bonanza get such huge blocks of airtime. I guess it's cheaper for TV Land to run one show for three or four hours than to have to pay for a few more classic shows that could run in some of those slots. This channel has really gone downhill.
Hallmark Channel didn't expand and contract the MASH airtime exactly when MASH was in the later and earlier seasons, respectively. They did change the air times a lot but the changes didn't seem to coincide with the switches between Henry/Trapper/Frank and Potter/BJ/Charles. It didn't seem like whoever controls programming at Hallmark was changing the programming just to suit their own personal preferences of some seasons over others.
I used to think it was my imagination that TV Land was biased against certain seasons of these shows, but I'm not so sure it is just my imagination anymore. I don't think whoever controls TV Land's programming should be allowed to have their personal biases to affect programming at the viewers' expense, but it sure looks like they really do. It's just another example of why this channel is unreliable and inconsistent in providing classic television to viewers.
Robbie