View Full Version : Did The Producers of 'Three's Company' Mistreat Their Talent?!?


Brian Damage
09-11-2010, 10:34 PM
Do you think the producers mistreated the talent on Three's Company? If so, do you think the Suzanne Somers debacle caused it? For example....


The Ropers were promised back on the show if their spinoff failed. All they got was a guest starring appearance and that was it.

Ann Wedgeworth was fired

Jenilee Harrison was discarded

Then the coup de gras was Joyce, Richard Kline, Pricilla Barnes and Don Knotts were dumped for a new series with the Jack character.

TVFactFan
09-11-2010, 10:47 PM
They didn't mistreat the STARS-lol

Brian Damage
09-11-2010, 10:54 PM
They didn't mistreat the STARS-lol


What about Joyce?

TVFactFan
09-11-2010, 11:16 PM
Or should i say-"THE STAR"

lol

Brian Damage
09-12-2010, 12:08 AM
Or should i say-"THE STAR"

lol


So you admit they mistreated the supporting players?

USATVFAN
09-12-2010, 12:22 AM
Yes The Producers did mistreat the cast except for John. The Producers were jerks at time. It was Obviously that John was their Favorite!

Smartboy
09-12-2010, 07:05 AM
Do we know for a fact that Pricilla, Joyce, Richard and John wanted to stay on after the original series was over? Is this documented anywhere?

SpunkiiMonkii7078
09-14-2010, 12:35 AM
Joyce has said she thought Three's A Crowd should have been with Jack and Janet.

TVFactFan
09-14-2010, 10:09 PM
Joyce wasn't the star of the show

Smartboy
09-14-2010, 11:51 PM
I would like to apologize for a goof that I made in my last response. When I was listing the performers whose character's had been terminated by the time of "Three's a Crowd", the last of four that I meant to write was Don (as in Don Knots) but I ended up write John instead! I am sorry if I confused anyone!

lucyandethel
09-15-2010, 02:27 AM
I think there has always been this notion that John Ritter was the star of the show. While I think he was a very talented and funny performer, I don't think the success of the show rested on his shoulders. It was an ensemble show. After the show had been on eight years, they couldn't continue in the same format and they had to shake things up a little bit. The decided to continue with the Jack Tripper character and shelve everyone else. Obviously, it wasn't a good idea because "Three's a Crowd" didn't last. It was a business move, hence the name, "show business".

USATVFAN
09-15-2010, 09:53 AM
I think there has always been this notion that John Ritter was the star of the show. While I think he was a very talented and funny performer, I don't think the success of the show rested on his shoulders. It was an ensemble show. After the show had been on eight years, they couldn't continue in the same format and they had to shake things up a little bit. The decided to continue with the Jack Tripper character and shelve everyone else. Obviously, it wasn't a good idea because "Three's a Crowd" didn't last. It was a business move, hence the name, "show business".
I agree. It was not a 1-Star show. It was an Ensemble. Joyce Dewitt said once that Her and John always thought of it as an Ensemble show not a 1-Star show.

Only 1 Cast member thought it was a 1-Star show and she thought she was the Star. You all know who I am talking about.

Jude The Obscure
09-15-2010, 10:39 AM
I do know that Joyce and Priscilla are not too fond of what happened during the later seasons regarding how the producers treated them.

Mr. Television
09-15-2010, 11:43 AM
TC was an ensemble show in a way. All the cast were great and contributed to it's success but c'mon. I don't care what John and Joyce said, he was the star. If he left, the show was over. Joyce could have been replaced just like Suzanne was replaced. The Ropers were a big part of the show but they were replaced and as much as I liked DK and RK , they could have been replaced too and the show could have went on. Would it have been the same? No but nobody knows if it would have been better or worse. The replacements worked out pretty well for Chrissy and the Ropers and I actually think that kept the show more fresh. If John left the show, it would have been over pretty fast. All shows, even shows that have star talent is only as good as the supporting cast. The problem with TAC was the supporting cast especially Mary Cadorette. Alan Campbell was annoying. John and Robert Mandan were good but if the cast was better, it could have last longer and actually even with the cast, the ratings were not that bad. It had about the same ratings as Who's the Boss which broke out into a hit during year 2.

and nobody wanted to see Jack and Janet in TAC. Ratings were falling and they needed to rejump the series. If they were going to keep Janet on the show, they should have just done a final season of TC which is what they probably should have done anyway. Of course I also heard that Priscilla's contract was up so they probably would have had to replace her.