View Full Version : I Can't Understand Why "James Evans" Death Wasn't Considered Shocking By Critics


Brian Damage
05-29-2010, 02:26 PM
Why is that? Every list I read about doesn't have him listed anywhere. I mean this was a sitcom that killed off one of its leading actors and nothing...

catlover79
05-29-2010, 02:35 PM
I don't know - but from what I've read, the CAST was sure shocked!!

Retro4Life
05-29-2010, 03:37 PM
I can't speak for anyone else, but I watched the episode when it premiered, and my family and I were very shocked.

TVFactFan
05-29-2010, 05:34 PM
Probably because it was already published before the season started in 1976 that he was no longer on the show so I guess they found no reason to be shocked.

Basically that was the only way to write him off because which probably may it less shocking

Retro4Life
05-29-2010, 05:39 PM
Probably because it was already published before the season started in 1976 that he was no longer on the show so I guess they found no reason to be shocked.

Basically that was the only way to write him off because which probably may it less shocking

I think the feeling was that James was going to get a new job out of town, which would keep him away for long periods of time. The thought that he actually might be killed off was kind of not in many people's radar at the time, though.

TVFactFan
05-29-2010, 06:01 PM
I think the feeling was that James was going to get a new job out of town, which would keep him away for long periods of time. The thought that he actually might be killed off was kind of not in many people's radar at the time, though.


Crtiics knew because saying that he took another job out of town would have been inconsistent with the storyline of the episode-"A Real Cool Job".

Dr. Thong
05-29-2010, 08:00 PM
They should have recast the role of James with Dick Sargent.

Brian Damage
05-29-2010, 08:08 PM
Probably because it was already published before the season started in 1976 that he was no longer on the show so I guess they found no reason to be shocked.

Basically that was the only way to write him off because which probably may it less shocking


I don't know Solomon, I mean things were different back then. While it might have been published in a magazine, if you didn't read about it, you were pretty much in the dark. Now a days, we have the internet, cable, entertainment shows, gossip rags etc. There are more ways now to find out about scoops, then say back in 1976.

catlover79
05-29-2010, 08:10 PM
They should have recast the role of James with Dick Sargent.
:rofl: No one would've even noticed - except the audience, of course!!!

Dr. Thong
05-29-2010, 08:12 PM
:rofl: No one would've even noticed - except the audience, of course!!!

Did you ever see the movie Wayne's World, Monika? In it, Wayne (Mike Myers) goes "I mean, there were two Darren Stevens, right? Dick York and Dick Sargeant. Yeah, right! As if we wouldn't notice! Oh, hold on.. Dick York, Dick Sargeant... Sargeant York. Hey, that's weird!"

Mr. Television
05-29-2010, 08:15 PM
I don't know Solomon, I mean things were different back then. While it might have been published in a magazine, if you didn't read about it, you were pretty much in the dark. Now a days, we have the internet, cable, entertainment shows, gossip rags etc. There are more ways now to find out about scoops, then say back in 1976.
I didn't know he was getting killed off. I didn't watch GT all that much back then. It was always on opposite other shows I liked so I didn't become a fan until it went into syndication in the 1980's. I do remember seeing that episode though and just being stunned. I didn't follow TV like I do now so it might have been published how they were going to get rid of him.

Brian Damage
05-29-2010, 08:33 PM
I didn't know he was getting killed off. I didn't watch GT all that much back then. It was always on opposite other shows I liked so I didn't become a fan until it went into syndication in the 1980's. I do remember seeing that episode though and just being stunned. I didn't follow TV like I do now so it might have been published how they were going to get rid of him.


That's true, although the gasps from the studio audience really made me think that nobody expected it.

TVFactFan
05-29-2010, 08:35 PM
I don't know Solomon, I mean things were different back then. While it might have been published in a magazine, if you didn't read about it, you were pretty much in the dark. Now a days, we have the internet, cable, entertainment shows, gossip rags etc. There are more ways now to find out about scoops, then say back in 1976.


In the Fall 1976 TV Guide preview, they let viewers know to expect a shocking ending

Brian Damage
05-29-2010, 08:45 PM
In the Fall 1976 TV Guide preview, they let viewers know to expect a shocking ending


But I doubt people were still expecting death as an option.

catlover79
05-29-2010, 09:56 PM
But I doubt people were still expecting death as an option.
:yeahthat

Dr. Thong
05-30-2010, 11:54 AM
I'm guessing that maybe people thought that James would stay down in Alaska alone because Florida didn't want to uproot the kids or something. Okay, maybe that's not plausible because they lived in the ghetto, but this is TV and it didn't have to make sense.

And maybe people would figure that if James was alive off-camera, perhaps John Amos would have reconsidered "leaving" (the official story at the time was that he quit) and return to the show at some point.

But it would have been cheesy for the producers to do so...or to have James and Florida divorce and have James move away. That would not have been believable.

Of course, they could have had Amos come back and say that he hadn't really died -- it was a case of mistaken idenity and-- oh wait, that's what soap operas do....;)