Somebody mentioned in another thread about how many UM cases have tons of information you can research, while others have next to nothing. I know alot of it is because of the availability of old newspaper articles (some are free, while others you have to pay for...and others may not even be available online at all). Plus there wasn't really a mass media until c. 1997/98 when the internet first began getting popular (and even that is primitive compared to now, in terms of archiving things as they happen).

I've tried researching lots of cases I'm interested in just to see what comes up. For example, the Roger Dean case has nothing at all aside from this board! That was always one of the ones that fascinated me the most, and it's so unusual, which is why I'm surprised.

P.S. If you can't find articles doesn't it almost seem like it didn't really happen in a way? Almost like the segment seems that much more mysterious!