Zoneboy
02-23-2010, 11:08 PM
Link (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/02/22/DI2010022203188.html)
Washington Post Style columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner Tom Shales will be online Tuesday, Feb. 23, at Noon ET to discuss television, its cultural impact and his columns.
Today's column: Tom Shales reflects on 'Father Knows Best' and his real-life Margaret
Submit your questions and comments before or during today's discussion.
Shales, The Washington Post's chief television critic for 30 years, is the author of several books, including "On the Air," "Legends" and "Live From New York." His column, "Shales on TV," appears in the paper every Tuesday.
____________________
Tom Shales: Hello again, thank you for being there - wherever 'there' may be. I am here, wherever here is. But before I get too philosophical -- I should get to the questions.
_______________________
Olney, Md.: Good afternoon Tom. I completely enjoyed reading your trip down TV memory lane with the Andersons of "Father Knows Best".
I like to mention another classic sitcom, "The Patty Duke Show" which I have revisited recently since it now airs on cable early weekday mornings. Thank goodness for TiVo!
Cut from virtually the same cloth as FKB, "The Patty Duke Show" takes on the perspective of a teenage girl (Patty) growing up in the early to mid 1960s with all its slang, and was the perfect companion show paired with another TV classic that you refer to, "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" on ABC for that show's last three seasons.
For 96 episodes, Patty and her "twin cousin" Cathy explore life, with the help of Patty's dad, Martin Lane, to keep it all in perspective. She had a beautifully dimpled mom, Natalie Lane, played by actress Jean Byron. It seems that virtually all TV moms of that era had either cute dimples or high cheekbones.
While both programs simplifed real life, they both provide enjoyable accounts of life at that time, a simplier life without the cell phones, etc., of today, where families always ate together and spent time together after dinner in the living room, and not, by the way, watching TV.
Tom Shales: Thanks. We all have our favorites, usually the shows we watched in adolescence or just before. I will tell you a story and try to make it quick ... Before I worked at the Post I worked for - some other paper - and Robert Reed, the actor, was sent around to promote his new show "The Brady Bunch." And I remember him telling me that yes, he knew there were lots of family sitcoms on the air but "we hope to make this one just a little more intelligent than most." Well of course there was nothing intelligent about it. It's almost "Gilligan'sIsland" stupid. And yet people who grew up watching it have great affection for it, and Hollywood even catered to them by making a movie version, or two, not that long ago. The quality or lack of quality has nothing to do with one's affection for a TV series -- true perhaps of other things in life as well. Thank you.
_______________________
NBC's Olympics: Tom, as a real sports fan I'm very frustrated with NBC's prime-time coverage. Too much figure skating, ice dancing, and 'features' -- not enough actual competition...especially live. How could they choose to put USA-Canada hockey on MSNBC this past Sunday instead of on the main channel?
Tom Shales: Beats me. They must have their research and polls and surveys about what will draw the biggest crowds - or maybe there was the feeling that they didn't want it to look like what was playing on the "other" NBC networks was exclusively the minor, fringe, small-audience kind of thing. So they spread the big-ticket items around- perhaps? I know there are lots of complaints, but there always are. I like events that are fun to watch, I don't care much about competitiveness, but most people do.....
_______________________
Santa Fe, N.M. : is 24 maxed out?
Tom Shales: Spiritually it certainly is. Do you think they should do ANOTHER season? I don't know if it's in the cards. And Kiefer Sutherland has to stay out of jail.
_______________________
Old TV Viewer: As entertaining or escapist as those old sitcoms (e.g., Father Knows Best, Leave It To Beaver, December Bride) were, the BEST television was that given to us by Berle, Gleason, Skelton, Sullivan (and select others). I especially loved the multi-talented Gleason and Skelton because each discreet show seemed to offer broad comedy, gentle humor, pathos, music and, well, pure entertainment. Signed, Missing Those Shows
Tom Shales: I agree, "Variety" was the byword in early television because the audience was considered to be , well,
EVERYBODY. There was an attempt to provide something "for the whole family," at least from 8 til 10 (7 til 9 in the midwest). Gleason could be quite brilliant but I also think he over-extended himself. Berle, like Gleason, tried to ride herd over every detail of the show. I even liked the low-key souls like Perry Como - every show didnt come stampeding at the viewer. Como's hour said "relax, calm down, put your feet up" etc. Nothing on television today really invites you to lay back and chill....
_______________________
Not a question: but a comment. That was a sweet column on your mother; made me tear up. Thanks!
Tom Shales: Thank YOU. If left to my own devices, I would have been much more sentimental -- but people would might have found it a trifle excessive. I always think of Nixon talking about his mother - one of the few cases where he seemed to be affecting and sincere. "My mother was a saint" -- well there are millions and millions who feel that way. Hence the national mantra "Hi Mom" still mouthed by the toughest football players in the business when they find they're on camera.....
_______________________
Hockey on MSNBC: My only complaint about pushing that great U.S.-Canada hockey game to MSNBC is that the channel isn't carried in HD on DirecTV. I found the game almost unwatchable because of poor picture quality. Very frustrating!
Tom Shales: I wondered about that. WHY would MSNBC be High-Def during normal times? With all due respect nobody needs to see every line on the face of Keith Olbermann or Chris Matthews. NBC should not have relegated HD-worthy stuff to non-HD channels.
_______________________
Bethesda, Md.: Tom, vey nice column today. I read it as a eulogy for your mom and a tribute to moms everywhere. Well done.
Tom Shales: Thank you.
_______________________
NBC Coverage: I'd love to see the focus group who told NBC that viewers would much rather watch a feature on the Canadian Mounties -- during prime time, no less -- than event coverage.
Tom Shales: Yeah - er - good point. That's not focus group stuff, that's some "creative" producer. They sit around a conference room and go "What do people think of when they think of Canada?" "Well let's see - the Mounties, Polar Bears, maple syrup...." Watch for a feature on maple syrup, the why's and wherefore's....
_______________________
Philadelphia, Pa.: I am reading a TV column that mentions how "Lost" ratings have been increased because they are now counting people who watch the show after recording it.
Please explain to me how this works. You mean the ratings people finally realized that most of America records their shows, even recording one show while watching another, and doesn't watch them in real time? Wow. Maybe ratings someday will reflect what we, the public, actually watch. If this is true, are there any indications, other than "Lost," which shows might be in line to gain substantial ratings once it is realized people record the show?
Tom Shales: Well there's long been a similar complaint about shows watched on college campuses -- when I was in school, 50 or 60 students would gather in a recreational room and watch "Batman" (yeah, we weren't very picky - actually Batman was considered camp and cool in its time). I think the technology is set up for registering what people watch "live" but it's complicated to measure what they watch on tape-delay (TiVo, DVR's, whatever) so Nielsen is just now catching up with technology. In their defense, it does move fast. Now - are they going to measure what people watch on their cell phones or other hand-held devices? It's getting very complicated.
_______________________
Takoma Park, Md.: Hi Tom,
I know some folks get bent out of shape when you discuss Turner Classic Movies, even though it IS a TV station, can I just put in another plug for how wonderful TCM is?!
Took yesterday off and found a wonderful old thriller on TCM: "Night Must Fall" from 1937 with Robert Montgomery, Rosalind Russell and Dame May Witty. Really suspenseful with not one view of violence or blood. Am now looking for it on DVD!
Tom Shales: You know one place to look is TCM itself. Go to their web site - they have a bunch of old movies for sale on DVD, and the prices are basically competitive (frankly, it makes me kinda sad to see some old classic for sale in a grocery story for 6 dollars and 47 cents - I think of all the work that went into that picture! Now people can own it for about what they once paid for a couple admission tickets just to see it once in a theater). Warner Bros Home Video has a new thing where they print copies on DVD sort of on-demand -- less-famous movies like "Night Must Fall" just might be available on that WB label, so long as Warners or MGM or maybe RKO owns them now, or released them then. Again - complications!
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: Is TV really that much more realistic now? Yes, it's more sensational (more sex, more violence), but is that reality? For example, most Americans are religious -- how many shows have individuals or families whose religious practices are shown, or even mentioned? Most Americans live a middle-class life, but dramas freqently feature the wealthy, or give the "middle class" family a much larger house with nicer furnishings than they could reasonably afford, or give people in creative jobs (like newspaper columnists) ridiculously large salaries. How many programs focus on people in blue-collar jobs, or rural settings?
More sex and violence does not necessarily mean more accurate programming. It's television still showing us what we want to see.
Tom Shales: "ridiculously large salaries"? ha ha ha ha ha. You haven't been reading about the state of the economy in Newspaper Land. In fact in Media Ville. Why do you think I was still borrowing money from my mother in my 40s? 'Cause I was broke! Seriously, the newspaper business pays few of its members well. The only way to suck up a huge income is to be syndicated like George Will. He makes a fortune. And deservedly so -- I don't begrudge him that. TV critics are notoriously underpaid, though the Post was good to me for many years, relatively speaking......
_______________________
Washington Post Style columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner Tom Shales will be online Tuesday, Feb. 23, at Noon ET to discuss television, its cultural impact and his columns.
Today's column: Tom Shales reflects on 'Father Knows Best' and his real-life Margaret
Submit your questions and comments before or during today's discussion.
Shales, The Washington Post's chief television critic for 30 years, is the author of several books, including "On the Air," "Legends" and "Live From New York." His column, "Shales on TV," appears in the paper every Tuesday.
____________________
Tom Shales: Hello again, thank you for being there - wherever 'there' may be. I am here, wherever here is. But before I get too philosophical -- I should get to the questions.
_______________________
Olney, Md.: Good afternoon Tom. I completely enjoyed reading your trip down TV memory lane with the Andersons of "Father Knows Best".
I like to mention another classic sitcom, "The Patty Duke Show" which I have revisited recently since it now airs on cable early weekday mornings. Thank goodness for TiVo!
Cut from virtually the same cloth as FKB, "The Patty Duke Show" takes on the perspective of a teenage girl (Patty) growing up in the early to mid 1960s with all its slang, and was the perfect companion show paired with another TV classic that you refer to, "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" on ABC for that show's last three seasons.
For 96 episodes, Patty and her "twin cousin" Cathy explore life, with the help of Patty's dad, Martin Lane, to keep it all in perspective. She had a beautifully dimpled mom, Natalie Lane, played by actress Jean Byron. It seems that virtually all TV moms of that era had either cute dimples or high cheekbones.
While both programs simplifed real life, they both provide enjoyable accounts of life at that time, a simplier life without the cell phones, etc., of today, where families always ate together and spent time together after dinner in the living room, and not, by the way, watching TV.
Tom Shales: Thanks. We all have our favorites, usually the shows we watched in adolescence or just before. I will tell you a story and try to make it quick ... Before I worked at the Post I worked for - some other paper - and Robert Reed, the actor, was sent around to promote his new show "The Brady Bunch." And I remember him telling me that yes, he knew there were lots of family sitcoms on the air but "we hope to make this one just a little more intelligent than most." Well of course there was nothing intelligent about it. It's almost "Gilligan'sIsland" stupid. And yet people who grew up watching it have great affection for it, and Hollywood even catered to them by making a movie version, or two, not that long ago. The quality or lack of quality has nothing to do with one's affection for a TV series -- true perhaps of other things in life as well. Thank you.
_______________________
NBC's Olympics: Tom, as a real sports fan I'm very frustrated with NBC's prime-time coverage. Too much figure skating, ice dancing, and 'features' -- not enough actual competition...especially live. How could they choose to put USA-Canada hockey on MSNBC this past Sunday instead of on the main channel?
Tom Shales: Beats me. They must have their research and polls and surveys about what will draw the biggest crowds - or maybe there was the feeling that they didn't want it to look like what was playing on the "other" NBC networks was exclusively the minor, fringe, small-audience kind of thing. So they spread the big-ticket items around- perhaps? I know there are lots of complaints, but there always are. I like events that are fun to watch, I don't care much about competitiveness, but most people do.....
_______________________
Santa Fe, N.M. : is 24 maxed out?
Tom Shales: Spiritually it certainly is. Do you think they should do ANOTHER season? I don't know if it's in the cards. And Kiefer Sutherland has to stay out of jail.
_______________________
Old TV Viewer: As entertaining or escapist as those old sitcoms (e.g., Father Knows Best, Leave It To Beaver, December Bride) were, the BEST television was that given to us by Berle, Gleason, Skelton, Sullivan (and select others). I especially loved the multi-talented Gleason and Skelton because each discreet show seemed to offer broad comedy, gentle humor, pathos, music and, well, pure entertainment. Signed, Missing Those Shows
Tom Shales: I agree, "Variety" was the byword in early television because the audience was considered to be , well,
EVERYBODY. There was an attempt to provide something "for the whole family," at least from 8 til 10 (7 til 9 in the midwest). Gleason could be quite brilliant but I also think he over-extended himself. Berle, like Gleason, tried to ride herd over every detail of the show. I even liked the low-key souls like Perry Como - every show didnt come stampeding at the viewer. Como's hour said "relax, calm down, put your feet up" etc. Nothing on television today really invites you to lay back and chill....
_______________________
Not a question: but a comment. That was a sweet column on your mother; made me tear up. Thanks!
Tom Shales: Thank YOU. If left to my own devices, I would have been much more sentimental -- but people would might have found it a trifle excessive. I always think of Nixon talking about his mother - one of the few cases where he seemed to be affecting and sincere. "My mother was a saint" -- well there are millions and millions who feel that way. Hence the national mantra "Hi Mom" still mouthed by the toughest football players in the business when they find they're on camera.....
_______________________
Hockey on MSNBC: My only complaint about pushing that great U.S.-Canada hockey game to MSNBC is that the channel isn't carried in HD on DirecTV. I found the game almost unwatchable because of poor picture quality. Very frustrating!
Tom Shales: I wondered about that. WHY would MSNBC be High-Def during normal times? With all due respect nobody needs to see every line on the face of Keith Olbermann or Chris Matthews. NBC should not have relegated HD-worthy stuff to non-HD channels.
_______________________
Bethesda, Md.: Tom, vey nice column today. I read it as a eulogy for your mom and a tribute to moms everywhere. Well done.
Tom Shales: Thank you.
_______________________
NBC Coverage: I'd love to see the focus group who told NBC that viewers would much rather watch a feature on the Canadian Mounties -- during prime time, no less -- than event coverage.
Tom Shales: Yeah - er - good point. That's not focus group stuff, that's some "creative" producer. They sit around a conference room and go "What do people think of when they think of Canada?" "Well let's see - the Mounties, Polar Bears, maple syrup...." Watch for a feature on maple syrup, the why's and wherefore's....
_______________________
Philadelphia, Pa.: I am reading a TV column that mentions how "Lost" ratings have been increased because they are now counting people who watch the show after recording it.
Please explain to me how this works. You mean the ratings people finally realized that most of America records their shows, even recording one show while watching another, and doesn't watch them in real time? Wow. Maybe ratings someday will reflect what we, the public, actually watch. If this is true, are there any indications, other than "Lost," which shows might be in line to gain substantial ratings once it is realized people record the show?
Tom Shales: Well there's long been a similar complaint about shows watched on college campuses -- when I was in school, 50 or 60 students would gather in a recreational room and watch "Batman" (yeah, we weren't very picky - actually Batman was considered camp and cool in its time). I think the technology is set up for registering what people watch "live" but it's complicated to measure what they watch on tape-delay (TiVo, DVR's, whatever) so Nielsen is just now catching up with technology. In their defense, it does move fast. Now - are they going to measure what people watch on their cell phones or other hand-held devices? It's getting very complicated.
_______________________
Takoma Park, Md.: Hi Tom,
I know some folks get bent out of shape when you discuss Turner Classic Movies, even though it IS a TV station, can I just put in another plug for how wonderful TCM is?!
Took yesterday off and found a wonderful old thriller on TCM: "Night Must Fall" from 1937 with Robert Montgomery, Rosalind Russell and Dame May Witty. Really suspenseful with not one view of violence or blood. Am now looking for it on DVD!
Tom Shales: You know one place to look is TCM itself. Go to their web site - they have a bunch of old movies for sale on DVD, and the prices are basically competitive (frankly, it makes me kinda sad to see some old classic for sale in a grocery story for 6 dollars and 47 cents - I think of all the work that went into that picture! Now people can own it for about what they once paid for a couple admission tickets just to see it once in a theater). Warner Bros Home Video has a new thing where they print copies on DVD sort of on-demand -- less-famous movies like "Night Must Fall" just might be available on that WB label, so long as Warners or MGM or maybe RKO owns them now, or released them then. Again - complications!
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: Is TV really that much more realistic now? Yes, it's more sensational (more sex, more violence), but is that reality? For example, most Americans are religious -- how many shows have individuals or families whose religious practices are shown, or even mentioned? Most Americans live a middle-class life, but dramas freqently feature the wealthy, or give the "middle class" family a much larger house with nicer furnishings than they could reasonably afford, or give people in creative jobs (like newspaper columnists) ridiculously large salaries. How many programs focus on people in blue-collar jobs, or rural settings?
More sex and violence does not necessarily mean more accurate programming. It's television still showing us what we want to see.
Tom Shales: "ridiculously large salaries"? ha ha ha ha ha. You haven't been reading about the state of the economy in Newspaper Land. In fact in Media Ville. Why do you think I was still borrowing money from my mother in my 40s? 'Cause I was broke! Seriously, the newspaper business pays few of its members well. The only way to suck up a huge income is to be syndicated like George Will. He makes a fortune. And deservedly so -- I don't begrudge him that. TV critics are notoriously underpaid, though the Post was good to me for many years, relatively speaking......
_______________________