View Full Version : Ulysses Roberson Jury Could Deliberate by Nov. 30


Zoneboy
11-19-2009, 06:01 AM
Link (http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/article/20091118/NEWS/911179981/1007&parentprofile=1056)


A judge denied a second motion by defense attorney Monica Lynch to have the case against alleged child killer Ulysses Roberson dismissed on Tuesday.

Roberson is on trial for the alleged murder of his 4-year-old son, Alexander Olive, who disappeared from a Tahoe Keys home in late 1985 or early 1986.

Following the close of prosecution witness testimony on Monday, Lynch argued that the case should be dismissed under California Penal Code Section 1111. The section reads a conviction cannot be based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.

Raj Roberson, Ulysses Roberson's first wife, is the only witness to testify she saw Olive dead in an upstairs bathtub prior to his disappearance.

Lynch argued on Tuesday that Raj Roberson acted as an accomplice in the murder of Olive on several fronts including using a blanket to cover a window to the garage where Roberson was beating the boy just prior to his alleged death.

Although Raj Roberson could be implicated in other crimes like child abuse for some of her actions while she was living with Roberson, she did not display behavior that would make her an accomplice to murder, said Suzanne Kingsbury, the El Dorado County Superior Court Judge hearing the case.

“There is sufficient evidence to have this go to the jury,” Kingsbury said, before denying Lynch's motion.

Following the conclusion of testimony on Tuesday afternoon, Kingsbury told the jury the trial is progressing ahead of schedule. The jury could begin deliberating as soon as Nov. 30, Kingsbury said.

Lynch began her defense of Roberson on Monday by calling several witnesses to the stand who reported seeing Olive alive since early 1986.

During previous testimony, Olive's mother, Rosemary Olive, described her son as having red hair and the light skin tone of someone with both African American and Caucasian heritage.

Yakima, Wash. resident Rhinda Clem says she repeatedly saw a boy matching Olive's description while working at the Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital gift shop in 1993.

The boy was about ten years old and was approximately 5 feet 10 inches tall and looked like he was both African American and Caucasian, Clem said.

The boy's skin was light colored, but he had brown, “more African-American looking hair,” Clem said.

She says she realized the boy could have been Olive after seeing a segment on the television show “Unsolved Mysteries” about the boy's disappearance. The segment included a picture of Olive.

“I told my husband this looks just like the boy that comes into the hospital gift shop,” Clem testified.

Clem called the show to report the possible sighting of Olive.

Rancho Cordova, Calif. resident Madeline Lucas testified she saw a boy matching Olive's description walking in front of her house on two occasions in 1990.

Lucas said she asked the boy — who she described as being about eight years old — how his day was at school. She said the boy just looked straight ahead and kept walking.

“He seemed disturbed,” Lucas testified.

Lucas reported the possible Olive sighting in 1993 after watching the same episode of “Unsolved Mysteries” Clem had seen.

“It looked exactly like the boy I had noticed,” Lucas said, about the picture of Olive displayed on the television show.

Garland, Texas resident Andria Gaither testified she believed she saw Olive accompanied by two women while she was working at a Nine West store in Dallas, Tex. in 2004.

A young man came into the store with the women and immediately sat down and began rocking back and forth, Gaither testified. She said the boy seemed like he had a “mental condition.”

The young man matched Olive's mother's description of the boy, Gaither said.

“His appearance was so unique I could not take my eyes off this person,” Gaither said.

She said she would not realize it could have been Olive until watching the segment on the boy's disappearance on “Unsolved Mysteries.”

“The moment that I saw the picture I instantly was reminded about an incident that happened in my store in Texas,” Gaither said.

One difference between the boy Gaither said she saw in the store and the picture of Olive on “Unsolved Mysteries,” was that the boy in the store had dark freckles while Olive did not, Gaither testified on cross examination.

“Other than the freckles, they looked exactly the same,” Gaither said.

Gaither said she reported the possible sighting of Olive to authorities, but was told that more information about the boy would be needed to pursue the possible lead into Olive's disappearance.

Apostapler
11-19-2009, 06:16 AM
I don't remember this case at all. Someone fill in the gaps please?

kadrmas15
11-19-2009, 09:58 AM
The woman, who met this guy while working at the hospital and she got sucked into his cult. I did not know Roberson was charged in this case. Good deal but it will not be easy to get a conviction without a body. Plus his accomplice testifying, hardly a star witness there. Even if there is a conviction, I would not be surprised if it were overturned.

kadrmas15
11-19-2009, 10:18 AM
It appears that Roberson might have another advantage. He does not have a death qualified jury. The prosecution did not seek the death penalty in this case, so at maximum Roberson will get LWOP if convicted. Roberson was charged with the special circumstance charge of torture in addition to 1st degree murder. The jury has to not only find him guilty of first degree murder but also find him guilty of committing the murder while engaging in torture to get LWOP. If they do not unanimously agree on the special circumstance charge but find him guilty of first degree murder than he will get 25 years to life.

It is unclear whether the jury will be allowed to consider lesser charges? If they are allowed to consider lesser charges, than if he is convicted of 2nd degree murder than the special circumstance charge goes away and he will get 15 years to life. If they are allowed to consider involuntary manslaughter and they convicted of him of that he would be sentenced to time served and released. However again, that depends if they are allowed to consider lesser charges. 2nd degree murder tends to be a popular compromise verdict.

However despite the benefits of some things in Roberson's favor, other things are against him. The county where the trial is being held is one of them. El Dorado County, California. The county stretches from the far eastern Sacramento suburbs all the way to the Nevada border. El Dorado County is home to south Lake Tahoe. Demographics are also not in Roberson's favor. The county is 90 percent white, with only about one half of one percent of the county's residents being black. 9 percent of the county's population is hispanic. Average income in the county is 51 grand a year.

Roberson was extradited to California from Washington State in 2004 where he had still been in prison. He was due to be released from prison in Washington State in 2006. So if he were to be acquitted in California, it is unclear if he would be immediately released or if he would be returned to Washington State to finish his prison term, the last two years of it and then be released?

sdb4884
01-27-2010, 11:08 AM
Hope he gets the death needle the bastard.

kadrmas15
01-27-2010, 12:03 PM
He will not get death. He was acquitted of first degree murder although he was convicted of the lesser offense of 2nd degree murder. He will get a mandatory 15 year to life sentence under California law for 2nd degree murder. That is a mandatory life sentence with parole eligibility after 15 years. In fact, earlier this month, Roberson was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison in California.

In the early 90's, Roberson was convicted of 2nd degree rape in Washington State after he was convicted of raping a 13 year old girl. He was sentenced to 10 to 20 years in state prison there for that charge. In 2003 or 2004 he was charged with the murder of Alexander and was extradited to California. They figured the case was as good as it was going to get and he had been in prison in Washington State for around 15 years by that time and so his sentence was winding down and they were afraid he would get out and they would never see him again. He was originally supposed to go to trial in 2006 but at the last minute he fired his lawyers just starting this mess all over again and he used various stall tactics to delay his trial. I believe they said he had been in county jail in California for 5 or 6 years before his trial started. Should Roberson ever be paroled from prison in California, he will be returned to Washington State to serve out the remainder of his rape sentence.

http://www.sacbee.com/crime/story/2467988.html