This supid A$$ network,the morons at ESPN are too stupid to realize that if the Pats had lost to Buffalo they would have played a better game against the Jets?


We all know how Football work, you play harder coming off a LOSS

ESPN loves Boston though. I am surprised.

ESPN loves Boston though. I am surprised.

Oh give me a damn break!! Now you realize that there is an actual love for the Patriots?

I've seen it all along... And yes, the east coast bias too...

The Pats are now 1-1, what should they complain about?

Oh give me a damn break!! Now you realize that there is an actual love for the Patriots?

I've seen it all along... And yes, the east coast bias too...

i'm not from boston, calm the f down. i don't like their bias for boston, i am just saying.

damn lol.

and no, it is not just east coast bias. they are obsessed with the lakers, and LA, so don't even say that.

Well the Pats play the Falcons this week and if they lose that game then we can say that the Dominance of the Pats is officially over

Well the Pats play the Falcons this week and if they lose that game then we can say that the Dominance of the Pats is officially over

Not really. It would be only Week 3 in the NFL, out of 17, and the Falcons are Super Bowl contenders.

seriously, this is getting too easy.

Not really. It would be only Week 3 in the NFL, out of 17, and the Falcons are Super Bowl contenders.

seriously, this is getting too easy.


Well they play the Ravens after that so if they lose that then will the PATS be over?

Well they play the Ravens after that so if they lose that then will the PATS be over?

1-3 is still manageable. They can still come back.

Eagles were deemed out of it when McNabb got injured in '06, and Garcia led them to 5 straight wins, a division title and into the playoffs, so how come the Pats can't do it? Depends on who they play, 3-4 games after the Ravens. and what they're record is, 9-12 games into this season.

1-3 is still manageable. They can still come back.

Eagles were deemed out of it when McNabb got injured in '06, and Garcia led them to 5 straight wins, a division title and into the playoffs, so how come the Pats can't do it? Depends on who they play, 3-4 games after the Ravens. and what they're record is, 9-12 games into this season.

Agree, if the Pats went 0-3, they can just call it quits!

Agree, if the Pats went 0-3, they can just call it quits!


Even at 0-3, I wouldn't count them out. The Colts started 0-4 two seasons ago I believe and they won their next 12.

The Colts barely won their first two games- they also could have been 0-2.

Solomon seems to think if a team loses one or two games, they are done for the year. Aka in his mind they are supposed to just give up. LOL

Solomon seems to think if a team loses one or two games, they are done for the year. Aka in his mind they are supposed to just give up. LOL


I didn' say their season would be over I said if they lost they wouldn't be seen as the TOP TEAM in the AFC anymore.

I didn' say their season would be over I said if they lost they wouldn't be seen as the TOP TEAM in the AFC anymore.

Because of 2/3 games? You still are stupid for saying that.

The Eagles lost their first two games in 2001, and still won something like 10 straight, and made it to the NFC Championship Game. I believe they WON the division that year too. So how is it not possible that the same could happen for New England?

You think before posting. THINK about it.

Because of 2/3 games? You still are stupid for saying that.

The Eagles lost their first two games in 2001, and still won something like 10 straight, and made it to the NFC Championship Game. I believe they WON the division that year too. So how is it not possible that the same could happen for New England?

You think before posting. THINK about it.


That's true but when you are used to seeing a team beat everyone in their division and tthey lose it's gets you to thinking.

http://bighugelabs.com/output/captionerb07969df98e601ecb443760176e64241c7f82fe7.jpg

^ Yeah true. I think it was actually 2002, on my part. Cause I remember the first game of 2002, which I am referring too, when they lost and started out 0-2, and eventually won 10 straight games and got into the playoffs, it was a rematch of the 2001 NFC Championship game (& subsequently the final game @ the Vet for the Eagles) with the Bucs, and they lost again, and to the Pats as well in 2002. But it still could apply to the Pats of 2009, besides the Eagles.

^ Yeah true. I think it was actually 2002, on my part. Cause I remember the first game of 2002, which I am referring too, when they lost and started out 0-2, and eventually won 10 straight games and got into the playoffs, it was a rematch of the 2001 NFC Championship game (& subsequently the final game @ the Vet for the Eagles) with the Bucs, and they lost again, and to the Pats as well in 2002. But it still could apply to the Pats of 2009, besides the Eagles.


It was 2003 and yes I never counted the Eagles out after going 0-2 because they were dominant at that time. The turning point in that season was when they beat the Giants on a miracle punt return by Westbrook which could have had them at 2-4 instead of 3-3

It was 2003 and yes I never counted the Eagles out after going 0-2 because they were dominant at that time. The turning point in that season was when they beat the Giants on a miracle punt return by Westbrook which could have had them at 2-4 instead of 3-3

You are right.

You are right.


I used to still get mad in 98 when the Eagles were like 2-10 and would win a game-lol I guess a fantasy of seeing the Eagles go 0-16