|
View Full Version : Missouri Burger King refuses to serve baby without shoes (video) bossradio93 08-06-2009, 03:31 PM A Missouri Burger King refuses to serve a six-month old baby because it did not have shoes on. Video, here (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/index.php?cl=14931533). Fox News/August 6, 2009 Chocoholic 08-06-2009, 03:41 PM How can a baby be refused service? And what could a baby possibly eat at BK anyway? Did they create a burger made of baby food? MrCleveland 08-06-2009, 03:51 PM I wonder what Burger King would do if you did this?... http://www.ronandjoe.com/cheese/mousepads/images/noshirtnoshoes_lg.jpg OH Nuts! 08-06-2009, 03:52 PM I can think of a lot of naughty replies but I won't go there! Doodyville10019 08-06-2009, 04:01 PM Another stupid law/rule/policy we can live without. So the baby had no shoes on? SO WHAT!? Serve her and her mom anyway. This isn't Typhoid Mary we're dealing with here. Chocoholic 08-06-2009, 04:03 PM I wonder what Burger King would do if you did this?... http://www.ronandjoe.com/cheese/mousepads/images/noshirtnoshoes_lg.jpg :brent phoebe7165 08-06-2009, 04:09 PM Another stupid law/rule/policy we can live without. So the baby had no shoes on? SO WHAT!? Serve her and her mom anyway. This isn't Typhoid Mary we're dealing with here. Yeah, really!! BK acts like the baby is paying for the food!!:crazy: phoebe7165 08-06-2009, 04:12 PM I wonder what Burger King would do if you did this?... http://www.ronandjoe.com/cheese/mousepads/images/noshirtnoshoes_lg.jpg Reminds me of when I went to Carowinds last week, they had a sign at a gate that read "All are required to wear shoes, shirts, and pants/shorts while in the park". I'm thinking who the heck is taking off their pants or shorts??:p Waterston_Fan 08-06-2009, 04:19 PM Don't most places want you to have a shirt, shoes and pants on when you go in their store? phoebe7165 08-06-2009, 04:25 PM Don't most places want you to have a shirt, shoes and pants on when you go in their store? Shirt & shoes I see all the time. Signs about wearing pants or shorts I don't see too much of, maybe because you'd figure that was a give-in!!;) browneyes106 08-06-2009, 04:54 PM Yeah, really!! BK acts like the baby is paying for the food!!:crazy: I agree the baby isn't paying customer. browneyes106 08-06-2009, 04:54 PM Yeah, really!! BK acts like the baby is paying for the food!!:crazy: I agree the baby isn't paying customer. MickeyMac 08-06-2009, 04:54 PM How can a baby be refused service? And what could a baby possibly eat at BK anyway? Did they create a burger made of baby food? I was wondering that myself. catlover79 08-06-2009, 08:35 PM I saw that on the news last night. That is just plain stupidity. The baby can't walk anyway, so what's the difference if the kid isn't wearing shoes? So much for "have it your way"!!! :mad: catlover79 08-06-2009, 08:36 PM I wonder what Burger King would do if you did this?... http://www.ronandjoe.com/cheese/mousepads/images/noshirtnoshoes_lg.jpg :rofl: :brent BeavisandButthead 08-07-2009, 08:48 PM I wonder what Burger King would do if you did this?... http://www.ronandjoe.com/cheese/mousepads/images/noshirtnoshoes_lg.jpg :D :talk: :lol: Crimson and Clover 08-08-2009, 09:55 PM utterly stupid |