View Full Version : An observation about "Lucy Is Matchmaker":


Frank Gannucci
05-09-2009, 10:47 PM
I own the I Love Lucy Book by Bart Andrews that was made in 1985. It says that in "Lucy Is Matchmaker" that Lucy and Ethel were wearing very skimpy negliees. I watched this episode several times and I don't think the clothing that Lucy and Ethel were wearing were skimpy at all. When I think of skimpy clothing, I think of things like G-strings and things like that. What do you think about the negliees that Lucy and Ethel were wearing?

gidgetgrape
05-10-2009, 04:45 PM
Are you for real?!? It was 1953. They were barely allowed to show knees back then.

Frank Gannucci
05-10-2009, 10:13 PM
Yes, I do realize that this episode was made in '53. I do realize times were much different than. I was just comparing those negliees to the risque clothing of today that's all.

Hughsgirl
05-12-2009, 09:42 AM
It was "skimpy" for the standards back then...not today. IMO, the women proved that you could be sexy without showing MOST of your body off...they had alot of taste and were every bit as sexy and maybe even more then the trolops of today because of the lack of taste in clothing nowdays. I loved the nighty Lucy was wearing...very beautiful.

dawsongirl
05-12-2009, 09:28 PM
That was skimpy, even back then?

Hughsgirl
05-13-2009, 09:13 AM
That was skimpy, even back then?

I think to most people it was considered skimpy.

tdr
05-18-2009, 04:18 PM
I don't think those negligees being "skimpy" was the point, and considering cocktail waitresses and 'cigarette girls' and chorus lines, I don't think they were. The point was their being in Eddie's hotel room having changed into bedclothes and being surprised when a knock at the door was their husbands; and neither they, nor the audience, are supposed to have known their husbands knew they were there.

Hughsgirl
05-20-2009, 03:33 PM
I don't think those negligees being "skimpy" was the point, and considering cocktail waitresses and 'cigarette girls' and chorus lines, I don't think they were. The point was their being in Eddie's hotel room having changed into bedclothes and being surprised when a knock at the door was their husbands; and neither they, nor the audience, are supposed to have known their husbands knew they were there.


Good point...Could you imagine the thoughts that went through the audience's minds?:eek:

LittleRickyII
05-20-2009, 04:06 PM
I think to most people it was considered skimpy.

I don't think these negligees would have ever been considered skimpy, even in 1953. Heck, Lucy and Ethel's normal attire was skimpier than these negligees! All you can see are their faces and forearms. Cover that up and you wouldn't even be able to tell whether it was a man or a woman wearing those negligees. Five years before this episode, Marilyn Monroe posed topless for a famous calendar. Several months after this episode aired, Playboy Magazine was launched, which every month featured topless women. Have you ever seen what Bettie Page was doing around this time? Look her up on Youtube and you'll see. By the time of this episode, the public had been exposed to years of beautiful Hollywood actresses posing in bathing suits and other attire with low cleavage, complete exposure of their legs, and fully revealing their shape and form. And sometimes less! Heck, Disney movies at that time had sexier images than these negligees! Bart Andrews' statement is absurd.