Sage Rosenfels is a better QB and I had the Vikings doing good things this year and they are interviewing this stupid mutherF*cker who can never make up his mind? Why would the vikings want to interview a 40 year old QB who is interception prone and slower?


YOU HAVE SAGE ROSENFELS and don't need tp bring this a$$hole on. I always went through the roof when I heard this on ESPN

Brett,


Just f*ckin retire and retire for good.

The Vikings are dumb to meet with him. They should focus on Rosenfels being the starter for next season. Brett should just retire for good.

The Vikings are dumb to meet with him. They should focus on Rosenfels being the starter for next season. Brett should just retire for good.


and it's not like he was a success lasy year. He is a true idiot

You just answered your own question with that thread title. :lol:

You just answered your own question with that thread title. :lol:


makes no sense, they gave a good qb and want to meet with a loser

makes no sense, they gave a good qb and want to meet with a loser


:lol:

Brett Favre is 100 times better than Sage Rosenfels.

:lol:

Brett Favre is 100 times better than Sage Rosenfels.



Like I told Mike on Facebook, You must not have seen Rosenfels play because he is very good. I would take him over Romo, Eli, and jason campbell

Like I told Mike on Facebook, You must not have seen Rosenfels play because he is very good. I would take him over Romo, Eli, and jason campbell


You are absolutely crazy Sol

You are absolutely crazy Sol


Brian have you seen Rosenfels play?

Brian have you seen Rosenfels play?


Of course I have and if he was that good, he wouldn't be COMPETING for a starting job with Tavaris Jackson. Isn't he the same QB who choked away a lead when playing for the Texans?

Sage Rosenfels is average at best. He's competing with Tavaris Jackson for a starting spot, who's not even that great himself.

Sage Rosenfels is average at best. He's competing with Tavaris Jackson for a starting spot, who's not even that great himself.

exactly!

Also, Gus Frerotte is better than both of them.

Of course I have and if he was that good, he wouldn't be COMPETING for a starting job with Tavaris Jackson. Isn't he the same QB who choked away a lead when playing for the Texans?


How hard was that going to be?-lol

Also, Gus Frerotte is better than both of them.


You and me are better than Gus ferrotte, come on if you are going to stay on this board don't make tatements like that. Ferrotte stinks

You and me are better than Gus ferrotte, come on if you are going to stay on this board don't make tatements like that. Ferrotte stinks


Then explain why when Frerotte replaced Tavaris, they started winning. Then when they put Tavaris back in, they lost to the Eagles.

Of course I have and if he was that good, he wouldn't be COMPETING for a starting job with Tavaris Jackson. Isn't he the same QB who choked away a lead when playing for the Texans?


It wasn't him it was the Texans Defense

Then explain why when Frerotte replaced Tavaris, they started winning. Then when they put Tavaris back in, they lost to the Eagles.


Yes Tavaris needs to be mopping Floors and I agree he stinks, but what does Ferortte have to do woth Rosenfels??? Rosenfels has a arm, very accurate, and can run. Ferotte can't run and is interception prone

It wasn't him it was the Texans Defense

If I am not mistaken, he fumbled or threw an INT that cost them the game.

If I am not mistaken, he fumbled or threw an INT that cost them the game.


He fumbled but he still had a great day, wasn't his fault the defense collasped

Yes Tavaris needs to be mopping Floors and I agree he stinks, but what does Ferortte have to do woth Rosenfels??? Rosenfels has a arm, very accurate, and can run. Ferotte can't run and is interception prone


Going by your logic, Rosenfels > Favre. Quite a few QBs can do what Rosenfels can, plus. Brady, both Mannings, Cutler, Rivers, Jason Campbell, Favre, Warner, and Romo just to name a few. All of those guys are at least equal to Rosenfels. He's an average QB that keeps bouncing around.

He fumbled but he still had a great day, wasn't his fault the defense collasped

Solomon, the guy is a journeyman. How many great qb's do you know that have played on as many teams as he has?

Solomon, the guy is a journeyman. How many great qb's do you know that have played on as many teams as he has?


Because teams didn't want to give him a chance. The Dolphins never made him the starter because of Jay Fedler in 2002-2004. And Houston have the opportunity to make him a starter and got rid of him.


by the way, he has only played for two teams, Miami, and Houston

Going by your logic, Rosenfels > Favre. Quite a few QBs can do what Rosenfels can, plus. Brady, both Mannings, Cutler, Rivers, Jason Campbell, Favre, Warner, and Romo just to name a few. All of those guys are at least equal to Rosenfels. He's an average QB that keeps bouncing around.


Rosenfels is better than Eli, Romo, Cutler, and Campbell. Not the other quarterbacks which is of course Brady, Peyton Manning, Mcnabb, and Rivers,

Because teams didn't want to give him a chance. The Dolphins never made him the starter because of Jay Fedler in 2002-2004. And Houston have the opportunity to make him a starter and got rid of him.


by the way, he has only played for two teams, Miami, and Houston


Actually three if you count the Vikings. Anyway, the fact remains, if he was really that good, he would've beat out Jay Fiedler, Matt Schaub and Tavaris Jackson.

Rosenfels is better than Eli, Romo, Cutler, and Campbell. Not the other quarterbacks which is of course Brady, Peyton Manning, Mcnabb, and Rivers,


If he's so good, he'd have no problem finding a starting job.

If he's so good, he'd have no problem finding a starting job.


But see how again he was about to show the world he is a starter and now will be pushed to the sode again for a 40 year old loser. I had him taking the vikiings to the playoffs and winning.


I'm on the sage rosenfels bandwagon

But see how again he was about to show the world he is a starter and now will be pushed to the sode again for a 40 year old loser. I had him taking the vikiings to the playoffs and winning.


I'm on the sage rosenfels bandwagon

Favre might be able to get the Vikings not only to the playoffs, but possibly the Super Bowl.

you act like rosenfels is a tom brady, or peyton manning...for the record, sage SUCKS. anybody is a upgrade, and you only hate favre cause he has a losing record vs. the Eagles- Solomon.

you act like rosenfels is a tom brady, or peyton manning...for the record, sage SUCKS. anybody is a upgrade, and you only hate favre cause he has a losing record vs. the Eagles- Solomon.


Well that doesn't help but even after that he has proven that he is a LOSER. He got Eric Magini fired because he threw interceptions and another team wants him? Why would the vikings want him and he didn't lead the Jets to the playoffs??

Why would the vikings want him and he didn't lead the Jets to the playoffs??

Simple, he is an upgrade to both Jackson and Rosenfels.

Favre might be able to get the Vikings not only to the playoffs, but possibly the Super Bowl.


The Superbowl is a bit of a stretch. The playoffs are almost guaranteed as the Vikings are a far better defensive team than the Jets. Favre had the Jets at 8-3 and the #3 seed in the AFC, which is a very competitive conference. The Vikings, in a much weaker conference, can easily go 12-4 or 13-3. But to be honest, even at 13-3, I still see them losing to a team like the Eagles or Giants.

Well that doesn't help but even after that he has proven that he is a LOSER. He got Eric Magini fired because he threw interceptions and another team wants him? Why would the vikings want him and he didn't lead the Jets to the playoffs??

Yeah, he only was 8-3 at one time...in a NEW setting, NEW playbook, new teammates- you act like it's easy to be an NFL qb and adjust to a new team. you have to read 200 some pages at least, of plays....you have to adjust to receivers and your running backs, TEs etc. tendencies. You just go by stats every single time.

And he didn't get Mangini fired. He got himself fired for 2 non-playoff seasons the past 2 years. Was Favre their when Eric was 4-12?? No.

Here is some Rosenfels stats

longest pass was 77 yds
he has a 65.6 career completion percentage
he has 30 TD passes in just 12 starts



ANYMORE QUESTIONS???????????????????????????????????????????????????

I agree with Brian- the Vikings if they get Favre are Super Bowl contenders...

Ok here is his correct stats I made a error

He has 30 TD passes in just 12 starts
He is 6-6 as a starting QB in the NFL
his career completion percentage is 62.5


LOOKS GOOD TO ME

Here is some Rosenfels stats

longest pass was 77 yds
he has a 65.6 career completion percentage
he has 24 TD passes in just 12 starts



ANYMORE QUESTIONS???????????????????????????????????????????????????


Rosenfels also had 21 TD(1.4 per game) and 22 INT(1.47 per game) in the last 2 seasons. Favre averaged 1.56 TD per game and 1.16 INT per game. Completion % is 66.1 to 65.2 in favor of Favre. Here is the breakdown for the last 2 seasons:


Total touchdowns
Favre- 50
Rosenfels- 21


Total interceptions
Favre- 37
Rosenfels- 22


Touchdowns per game
Favre- 1.56
Rosenfels- 1.40


Total interceptions per game
Favre- 1.16
Rosenfels- 1.47


Completion %
Favre- 66.1
Rosenfels- 65.2


Favre still throws TD's at a higher rate, INT's at a lower rate, and a higher completion %. Favre > Rosenfels.

Rosenfels also had 21 TD(1.4 per game) and 22 INT(1.47 per game) in the last 2 seasons. Favre averaged 1.56 TD per game and 1.16 INT per game. Completion % is 66.1 to 65.2 in favor of Favre. Here is the breakdown for the last 2 seasons:


Total touchdowns
Favre- 50
Rosenfels- 21


Total interceptions
Favre- 37
Rosenfels- 22


Touchdowns per game
Favre- 1.56
Rosenfels- 1.40


Total interceptions per game
Favre- 1.16
Rosenfels- 1.47


Completion %
Favre- 66.1
Rosenfels- 65.2


Favre still throws TD's at a higher rate, INT's at a lower rate, and a higher completion %. Favre > Rosenfels.



I'm judging him on 12 starts, in 2007 he was 4-1 as a starter with a 64.2 % completion and 15 TD passses

Rosenfels also had 21 TD(1.4 per game) and 22 INT(1.47 per game) in the last 2 seasons. Favre averaged 1.56 TD per game and 1.16 INT per game. Completion % is 66.1 to 65.2 in favor of Favre. Here is the breakdown for the last 2 seasons:


Total touchdowns
Favre- 50
Rosenfels- 21


Total interceptions
Favre- 37
Rosenfels- 22


Touchdowns per game
Favre- 1.56
Rosenfels- 1.40


Total interceptions per game
Favre- 1.16
Rosenfels- 1.47


Completion %
Favre- 66.1
Rosenfels- 65.2


Favre still throws TD's at a higher rate, INT's at a lower rate, and a higher completion %. Favre > Rosenfels.



Farve has also thrown a 168 interceptions since the year of 2000. Interception King

I'm judging him on 12 starts, in 2007 he was 4-1 as a starter with a 64.2 % completion and 15 TD passses


2007:


TD per game
Favre- 1.75
Rosenfels- 1.67


INT per game
Favre- 0.94
Rosenfels- 1.33


Completion %
Favre- 66.5
Rosenfels- 64.2

Farve has also thrown a 168 interceptions since the year of 2000. Interception King


That's 18.67/year and 1.17/game. Rosenfels still throws INT's at a higher rate.

2007:


TD per game
Favre- 1.75
Rosenfels- 1.67


INT per game
Favre- 0.94
Rosenfels- 1.33


Completion %
Favre- 66.5
Rosenfels- 64.2


It doesn't matter, Sage is 10 years younger with a bright future and a hell of arm and nice accuracy.

It doesn't matter, Sage is 10 years younger with a bright future and a hell of arm and nice accuracy.


Sage is 31 and still not better than a 39 year old Brett. He has MAYBE 3-4 decent years left if he is healthy.

Sage is 31 and still not better than a 39 year old Brett. He has MAYBE 3-4 decent years left if he is healthy.


But what apeal does farve have at 40 years old? Last year alone he threw 22 interceptions and the same amount of TD's and the Jets still missed the playoffs

So what is it that the Vikings want??? They obbviusly were impressed with Rosenfels stats as a starter to make a trade for him. Farve is DONE

But what apeal does farve have at 40 years old? Last year alone he threw 22 interceptions and the same amount of TD's and the Jets still missed the playoffs

So what is it that the Vikings want??? They obbviusly were impressed with Rosenfels stats as a starter to make a trade for him. Farve is DONE


Did you not read my prior posts? He throws at a higher TD rate and a lower INT rate. It's the same thing in basketball. Guys that average 10 APG and upwards(ex: Nash, Paul, Kidd, Stockton) also turn the ball over more. However, they still have a higher assist/turnover ratio then someone like Derrick Rose or Rajon Rondo.

Did you not read my prior posts? He throws at a higher TD rate and a lower INT rate. It's the same thing in basketball. Guys that average 10 APG and upwards(ex: Nash, Paul, Kidd, Stockton) also turn the ball over more. However, they still have a higher assist/turnover ratio then someone like Derrick Rose or Rajon Rondo.


Not a fair comparison because in the last 2 years, Sage started 10 games and farve started 32

Not a fair comparison because in the last 2 years, Sage started 10 games and farve started 32


Prior to 2007, Sage never played in more than 4 games in a season. If that's the case, you can't compare them at all.

Prior to 2007, Sage never played in more than 4 games in a season. If that's the case, you can't compare them at all.


All I said was Rosenfels was a better option than a 40 year old interception prone QB. It's not like he led the Jets to the playoffs, is it just the NAME?? Because Farve is not that great and never has been.

how many superbowls has favre won for his team? how many has rosenfels?

1-0

favre is a great athlete and gunslinger of a QB. He does throw a lot of INTs but Rosenfels, as Darren proved, throws way more per game then Favre does...

All I said was Rosenfels was a better option than a 40 year old interception prone QB. It's not like he led the Jets to the playoffs, is it just the NAME?? Because Farve is not that great and never has been.


He's still not the better option. I just proved that Favre, even with more INT's thrown, he throws them at a lower rate, throws TD's at a higher rate, and has a higher completion %. Even if he is well past his prime, he's still better and I'd gladly take him over Rosenfels. Favre has been to the Pro Bowl 10 times and is a 3 time All-Pro. He's a first ballot Hall of Famer.

how many superbowls has favre won for his team? how many has rosenfels?

1-0

favre is a great athlete and gunslinger of a QB. He does throw a lot of INTs but Rosenfels, as Darren proved, throws way more per game then Favre does...


If the man can just get a opportunity to start maybe he can be a Brady or manning


Remember Before Brady got his start, his name was just THOMAS-lol

If the man can just get a opportunity to start maybe he can be a Brady or manning


Remember Before Brady got his start, his name was just THOMAS-lol


He's proven to be more of a liability than Favre. That's why he doesn't get the opportunity. If he got Favre's playing time, he'd be averaging like 24-25 INT's a season.

If the man can just get a opportunity to start maybe he can be a Brady or manning


Remember Before Brady got his start, his name was just THOMAS-lol

True...I wonder how the meeting with Childress will go for Favre..

True...I wonder how the meeting with Childress will go for Favre..


That's why Brad Chilress s a DUMB COACH. He is supposed to be trying to get Rosenfels ready to be the Franchise QB not bringing some IDIOT who has not done anything important since 1997

Sol, I don't understand your man-crush on Rosenfels.

First, you rip him for losing that game to Indy, and now you speak of him like he'll win next year's Offensive Player of the Year Award.

Sol, I don't understand your man-crush on Rosenfels.

First, you rip him for losing that game to Indy, and now you speak of him like he'll win next year's Offensive Player of the Year Award.


Because if he had won that game his career would have changed forever but now he has to prove himself again. I can already see he has the potential to be a top ten QB

Because if he had won that game his career would have changed forever but now he has to prove himself again. I can already see he has the potential to be a top ten QB


Not with an INT rate that is higher than Favre.

Not with an INT rate that is higher than Favre.


Even though he lost to the Colts, he still managed to show me he is a good QB. That was the best performance in a losing effort I ever seen in my NFL watching Life

It looks like Brett Favre can't handle the real world and that is why he keeps unretiring. Also, since this is Minnesota he can stick it to Green Bay.

I follow football a bit and I'm sick of hearing about him.