View Full Version : Edggerin James released by the Cardinals because he is 30 years old???????


TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 06:30 PM
So is Brian Westbrook, and all that sh*t that man did to help the Cardinals reach the SB is a slap in the face. All because they have a ROOKIE RB who maybe a BUST. Cardinals organization is ********


ESPN

Marvo301
04-28-2009, 06:34 PM
30 is very old for a running back. Because they take so many hits every time they touch the ball, running backs have a shorter career span than any other position in football.

TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 06:45 PM
30 is very old for a running back. Because they take so many hits every time they touch the ball, running backs have a shorter career span than any other position in football.


It's still a weird release since he played a HUGE role in the Cardinals getting to the SB just 3 months ago.

Marvo301
04-28-2009, 06:54 PM
It's still a weird release since he played a HUGE role in the Cardinals getting to the SB just 3 months ago.
The very same thing happened to Shaun Alexander in Seattle a couple of years ago after he led them to a Superbowl appearance. He was also in his early thirties.

Zoneboy
04-28-2009, 07:03 PM
The man just lost his girlfriend and the mother of his chidren, Talk about a slap in the face.

TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 07:04 PM
The very same thing happened to Shaun Alexander in Seattle a couple of years ago after he led them to a Superbowl appearance. He was also in his early thirties.


Well I guess Brian Westbrook days are numbered. Don't see him being with the Eagles in 2012

Mr. Television
04-28-2009, 07:24 PM
I think the Cardinals were a one season wonder. If Kurt Warner ever leaves, they're done.

TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 07:29 PM
I think the Cardinals were a one season wonder. If Kurt Warner ever leaves, they're done.


Not if they ae agressively planning for the future and attacking the need for a younger QB-lol

Mr. Television
04-28-2009, 07:32 PM
Not if they ae agressively planning for the future and attacking the need for a younger QB-lol
Isn't Matt Leinart supposed to be their QB of the future? lol

TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 07:37 PM
Isn't Matt Leinart supposed to be their QB of the future? lol


Yeah I had thought he would be but he seemed to go downhill after that Monday Game against the Bears when they led 20-0 and lost 23-20-LOL He was never the same after that game and I believe if they had won these two things would have happen

Bears would not have reached the SB

Matt Leinhart would have been the starting QB for the Cards heading into 2009

bandito
04-28-2009, 08:18 PM
Edge requested to be released, so he got his wish. I never thought he was all that anyway.

Brian Damage
04-28-2009, 10:16 PM
Well I guess Brian Westbrook days are numbered. Don't see him being with the Eagles in 2012


No, he won't, that is why the Eagles drafted a running back in the draft.

Brian Damage
04-28-2009, 10:17 PM
Edge requested to be released, so he got his wish. I never thought he was all that anyway.


It would be nice if the Giants picked him up...

TVFactFan
04-28-2009, 11:29 PM
It would be nice if the Giants picked him up...


He should get a job as long as he has a copy of the Cardinals playoff games-lol

Brian Damage
04-28-2009, 11:36 PM
He should get a job as long as he has a copy of the Cardinals playoff games-lol


He'll definitely be signed by someone.

bandito
04-29-2009, 09:26 PM
It would be nice if the Giants picked him up...Do the Giants need him? I thought the Giants were pretty solid at rb.

Wreckless
04-29-2009, 09:44 PM
Sounds like Philly syndrome lol- release a guy when he's too old, even if he's the best and classiest of the sport, ala BRIAN DAWKINS and others in the past.

But I hope we pick him up..we need another rb

Wreckless
04-29-2009, 09:47 PM
It's still a weird release since he played a HUGE role in the Cardinals getting to the SB just 3 months ago.

he really didn't & he's not as good as he was in Indy. The receivers, offense, defense & Special teams did more to get them further then he did. Not that they deserved to be in the SB anyway, cause they didn't.

Wreckless
04-29-2009, 09:49 PM
Do the Giants need him? I thought the Giants were pretty solid at rb.

They don't, so I don't know what he's talking about. Then again, the Giants or any other team for that matter would be good with a veteran backup like that, so I don't blame him.

But they have Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw, so.......????

The Eagles need it more then the Giants do, and a TE

TVFactFan
04-29-2009, 09:53 PM
he really didn't & he's not as good as he was in Indy. The receivers, offense, defense & Special teams did more to get them further then he did. Not that they deserved to be in the SB anyway, cause they didn't.


I was saying that after they beat Atlanta because Matt Ryan threw so many INT's but after Carolina nd the Eagles, they derserved to be there. Especially after losing the 24-6 lead to the Eagles and not losing the game.

Wreckless
04-29-2009, 09:58 PM
I was saying that after they beat Atlanta because Matt Ryan threw so many INT's but after Carolina nd the Eagles, they derserved to be there. Especially after losing the 24-6 lead to the Eagles and not losing the game.

I agree with you about deserving to be their, after playing good in the postseason, cause they did play a hell of a game against us and did well vs. Atlanta, killed Carolina and played well vs. Pitt and had a chance, but that's not why. I meant they shouldn't of even been in the playoffs in the first place because their record was 8-8 in the weakest division in football- both conferences included. No excuse to be in the playoffs with that kind of subpar record, in a HORRIBLE division at that lol. That's like having an advantage compared to your counterparts, yet barely beating them in a race or whatever it may be. 8-8 LOL

Doodyville10019
04-29-2009, 10:01 PM
Edge requested to be released, so he got his wish. I never thought he was all that anyway.

Detroit should be licking their chops right about now. They need all the EXPERIENCED offensive help they can get!

TVFactFan
04-29-2009, 10:03 PM
I agree with you about deserving to be their, after playing good in the postseason, cause they did play a hell of a game against us and did well vs. Atlanta, killed Carolina and played well vs. Pitt and had a chance, but that's not why. I meant they shouldn't of even been in the playoffs in the first place because their record was 8-8 in the weakest division in football- both conferences included. No excuse to be in the playoffs with that kind of subpar record, in a HORRIBLE division at that lol. That's like having an advantage compared to your counterparts, yet barely beating them in a race or whatever it may be. 8-8 LOL


I agree, i never thought they did but they got mad when chris berman started talking sh*t about them and they seem to change after he said what he said

Wreckless
04-29-2009, 10:12 PM
I agree, i never thought they did but they got mad when chris berman started talking sh*t about them and they seem to change after he said what he said

that's true, it lit a fire under their asses. but it doesn't change the fact that they got lucky to get in & didn't deserve to be. Then again the Eagles got a little bit lucky, with Houston & Oakland helping us get in on the last day of all teams, BUT we had a better record and a winning record, compared to the Cards, in a harder division & we beat them in the regular season- so we deserved to get in.