Nighthawk76
12-07-2008, 08:10 PM
Stanley Kubrick's 1971 film A Clockwork Orange remains almost 40 years after its release one of the most controversial films ever produced. Due to crimes in England that were inspired by the movie, and threats to him and his family, Kubrick had the film withdrawn from public viewing in Great Britian. It wasn't until after the director's 1999 death that the film was shown in England again.
A Clockwork Orange is certainly a difficult film to watch. It is very violent and disturbing. And the question is, did Kubrick go too far? I say no. I feel that to tell the story that he wanted to tell, Kubrick had to make the film difficult to watch. He was painting a portrait of a future where violence among youth is out of control. And the only way that the governemnt could put an end to this violence is to condition the young people to suffer great physical and mental pain when they feel like they are going to act violently. The good side of this conditioning is that it takes away the young people's will to commit violent acts, but in a sense it is also taking away their freewill. When the only way that the government can put a stop to violence is to take away people's freewill, is society being asked to pay too high a price? This is the question that this film is asking.
Any thoughts?
A Clockwork Orange is certainly a difficult film to watch. It is very violent and disturbing. And the question is, did Kubrick go too far? I say no. I feel that to tell the story that he wanted to tell, Kubrick had to make the film difficult to watch. He was painting a portrait of a future where violence among youth is out of control. And the only way that the governemnt could put an end to this violence is to condition the young people to suffer great physical and mental pain when they feel like they are going to act violently. The good side of this conditioning is that it takes away the young people's will to commit violent acts, but in a sense it is also taking away their freewill. When the only way that the government can put a stop to violence is to take away people's freewill, is society being asked to pay too high a price? This is the question that this film is asking.
Any thoughts?