View Full Version : Would Sanford have been better if there was more CLARA and WINSTON and less..


TVFactFan
03-09-2008, 09:12 PM
CLIFF and CISSY?? I think these two were dull and was not needed at all. The show would have been fine with

Fred
Cal
Winston
Clara
Rollo
Eve

GARFIELDKOOL
03-15-2008, 04:57 PM
CLIFF and CISSY?? I think these two were dull and was not needed at all. The show would have been fine with

Fred
Cal
Winston
Clara
Rollo
Eve

Cliff and Cissy were minor characters that really didn't contibute much. They just rounded out depth. So in my opinion, they wouldn't have mattered whether the show would have been better with them or not. Fred and Cal carried the show anyway.

TVFactFan
03-15-2008, 04:59 PM
Cliff and Cissy were minor characters that really didn't contibute much. They just rounded out depth. So in my opinion, they wouldn't have mattered whether the show would have been better with them or not. Fred and Cal carried the show anyway.



well they added more than cliff and cissy

comedyfreak
03-20-2008, 04:55 AM
CLIFF and CISSY?? I think these two were dull and was not needed at all. The show would have been fine with

Fred
Cal
Winston
Clara
Rollo
Eve
I myself, would have preferred that they had Rollo taking over as looking after Fred instead of introducing Cal into the show. Nathaniel Taylor was part of the original cast and deserved a bigger part on the show.

comedyfreak
03-20-2008, 04:57 AM
Sorry double post. I bought the Sanford series from iOffer and have been watching the show. I noticed that the interior of the house is different from the original.

TVFactFan
03-20-2008, 06:51 PM
I myself, would have preferred that they had Rollo taking over as looking after Fred instead of introducing Cal into the show. Nathaniel Taylor was part of the original cast and deserved a bigger part on the show.


Even Cliff had a bigger role than Rollo-lol