As you all know The Zodiac killer has been discussed many times before on the board. But since this post does not fit in with previous discussions I decided to make a new one.

There is a message board that I go to somewhat frequently and recently there has been some new developments ( or findings ) regarding The Zodiac case and since he was profiled on UM, I thought it would be nice if we could talk about the new findings.

For those who do not know about the case, you can read about here: http://zodiackiller.com/

Now on to the good stuff, earlier this year the SFC ( San Francisco Chronicle ) discovered an old card sent by ( they assume ) The Zodiac Killer, however this card was not sent in the 1960’s, no a bit more recent then that, the card was sent in 1990. Since I do not want to post a picture from another site ( message board actually ) Here is the link to the pictures of the envelope and card. http://zodiackiller.21.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=294


With all that said, personally I at first thought Arthur Lee Allen was The Zodiac, however things do not seem to add up to him being the Zodiac. I never believed that Ted Kaczynski was the Zodiac to me that was just to far out there. There is a good case against several others, as well as theories of who the killer was.

Just wondering what other’s are thinking, this case has been fascinated me for a very long time, however I do not think it will be solved, short of someone confessing and they have proof.

T*B

The Zodiac has always been a fascinating case. I love the Unabomber possible tie-in that UM did even though it probably isn't true after looking at the evidence.

As far as the Zodiac "new" card goes, didn't they say they now think it was most likely NOT from Zodiac himself?

I have the feeling this is one case that will never be solved. Technology is improving but so much time has gone by that making it conclusive may be impossible.