View Full Version : Americans blame media for celeb coverage


waichingliu81
08-03-2007, 12:49 PM
News is too scandalous for Americans: survey
Reuters
By Paul J. Gough Reuters - 1 hour 18 minutes ago

NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - Americans blame the media for the saturation of celebrity coverage on TV.

A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for People & the Press said Thursday that 87% of respondents believe celebrity scandals get way too much ink and airtime. Only 8% think the media get the balance between celebrity and serious news right, while 2% told the surveyors that there wasn't enough celebrity scandal coverage.

There's been no shortage of scandals to report on in 2007, from the death of Anna Nicole Smith and the subsequent custody battle over her infant daughter to the jail saga of heiress Paris Hilton. Despite the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a presidential campaign already under way, celebrity stories oftentimes have taken over the news. Pew found that 24% of all news was devoted to Smith at the time of her death, while 12% of all Americans said in early June that Hilton's incarceration was their most-followed news story of the week.

The survey found that cable news is most to blame for the ongoing celebrity coverage, with 34% of respondents saying cable news had the most celebrity coverage, followed by network TV news (27%), Internet news sites (15%) and newspapers (8%).

None of that type of celebrity news topped last week's list of the most followed topics, Pew said. Twenty-five percent of survey respondents said they were following the Iraq War most closely, though Pew noted that only 3% of news coverage was devoted to the story. The presidential campaign was singled out by 12% of respondents, while 12% of all news coverage featured it. Also on the list last week were the deaths of a Cheshire, Conn., mother and her two children in a home invasion, along with Iraq policy, the stock market and the saga of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Also receiving interest from news consumers was quarterback Michael Vick's dogfighting allegations, the continuing controversy over the home run record being chased by Giants slugger Barry Bonds and the NBA scandal over a referee who bet on games.

The survey sampled 1,027 adults from July 22-27.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter

Janice
08-03-2007, 01:30 PM
Whatever sells is what gets covered. If people weren't interested in it, they wouldn't buy the rags or tune into the coverage. People can claim they're tired of it all they want. If they didn't care, they'd tune out. My husband has zero interest in this stuff, and he proves it by ignoring it.

waichingliu81
08-03-2007, 02:01 PM
for me personally i avoid buying newspapers because the majority of them report on nothing but crap. funnily enough, i hated studying journalism at university and thus, i lost interest in the news. i kind of enjoyed it when i was 18, 19 but as i got older and realised how manipulative and one-sided the press can be over certain issues, particularly with the today's press i thought screw this. why should my opinions and views be shaped and influenced by whatever the name of the sensationalist newspaper or by tv news reports on irrelevant dirge such as paris hilton for eg. no wonder journalists are one of the most least trusted and respected people on the planet

Max Whittaker
08-04-2007, 03:52 AM
Whatever sells is what gets covered. If people weren't interested in it, they wouldn't buy the rags or tune into the coverage. People can claim they're tired of it all they want. If they didn't care, they'd tune out. My husband has zero interest in this stuff, and he proves it by ignoring it.

I agree. This poll proves nothing. I hate polls.

dawsongirl
08-05-2007, 12:37 AM
Those 2% who didn't think there was enough coverage... :lol: Morons.