View Full Version : Heather "Class-Act" Mills plans "McFartneys" cartoon


AKA
02-23-2007, 04:49 PM
Paraphrasing from Paul's 1971 song, "3 Legs": "My dog, she got one leg, but she can dance (with the stars)"

Does this wonderful specimen of humanity forget that her own daughter's last name is McCartney?

http://www.bcdb.com/bcdb/page.cgi?p=News

MILLS PLANS GAS ATTACK AGAINST PAUL MCCARTNEY

It's an ill wind that blows no good for ex-Beatle Paul McCartney.

According to British tabloid The Sunday Mirror, estranged wife Heather Mills is "secretly planning" a cartoon series called The McFartneys.

The title says it all... almost.

In a bid to humiliate McCartney, the show will depict Sir Paul "as a crude Homer Simpson-like slob who spends all day smoking pot and breaking wind," the paper said.

The show reportedly places Mills in a heroic role as a supermom taking care of business and her family.

However, Paul's children Stella, James and Mary are also made fun of.

One planned episode is said to spotlight McCartney's late wife Linda -- who died from breast cancer in 1998 -- as a ghost.

Mills thinks that changing the McCartneys' names slightly will give her license to come up with the bizarre plotlines, The Sunday Mirror said.

"This shows the lengths Heather Mills will go to in her attempts to blacken Paul's name," a source told the paper. "She wants it to be a cross between The Simpsons and South Park, and reckons it will get cult status. She'll clearly be sadly mistaken.

"She's saying the series will expose everything that has gone on and goes on in the McCartney family, all under the guise of the cartoon characters. But most of it has been dreamed up and cast from her skewed imagination."

Mills has set up a company named Raspberry Fields to produce the series. It's a parody of the Beatles' 1967 hit "Strawberry Fields Forever." Raspberry Fields was set up last July 3, two months after she and McCartney separated. Heather Mills is listed as the company director; her sister, Fiona Mills, 36, is secretary.

On June 28, the same company that owns Mills' personal Web site registered the domain names mcfartneys.co.uk and mcfartneys.com, as well as variations on the two names.

Mills has been speaking to several American television companies and has viewed several animators' show reels. "She has been desperately trying to keep the idea secret while she hunts for the right person to bring the characters to life," The Daily Mirror reported.

"She has spoken to Sex and The City creator Darren Star and Hollywood director Dennis Erdman about which networks to approach and who may be interested in the series," the tabloid's source said.

"Her backup, if no one will take it, is to produce it for the Internet, because she knows that even if the networks are too afraid to go up against Paul, people will tune in to it. She's looking at the work of different animators. The companies she's been looking at don't know it's for her at the moment, or what the project is.

"The trouble she's already finding is that people are reluctant to be in a show which sends up a legend like Paul McCartney."

Added the source: "The McFartneys will all get names similar to the McCartneys. So Heather will be given another flower name. This way the viewer will be able to work out who is meant to be who."

The cartoon will be sure to anger Paul McCartney, the source observed. "If there's one thing that will upset Paul, it's having Linda and his family brought into their divorce battle. He's very close to all his children and won't like this one bit.

"Most people are already saying they don't want to be associated with the project -- but with Heather's money after the settlement, it will definitely be made. It seems like Heather's whole life is geared towards getting revenge on Paul and getting as much money out of him as she can."

80sTrivia
02-23-2007, 05:12 PM
:eek: I really hope this is a joke... :eek:

Number 9 Dream
02-23-2007, 08:06 PM
She is utterly disgusting and tactless. This makes me so pissed :mad:

ABlairican Pie
02-23-2007, 10:18 PM
She is beyond tacky. She's as bad and tasteless as $haron Osbourne.


"All you need is love", Heather? ohno:

Jrnygrl
02-23-2007, 10:47 PM
This is truly sad. Did she marry him, with the intent to destroy him? I don't quiet understand what she wants, she has Paul's child, she will be set for life after the settlement, why does this crazy women have to bring up his wife and try to humiliate him this way???

We don't know what type of person Paul is, but he has always seemed really cool with his fans, and right now Paul is showing that he is truly the class act in this situation, and always had been in my opinion.

Nighthawk76
02-24-2007, 12:14 AM
I feel really bad for Paul. He did nothing to deserve this kind of disrespect. :( He always comes across to me as a really nice guy.

Janice
02-24-2007, 12:48 AM
I swear I saw right through that witch bitch the first time I laid eyes on her. They were on Larry King, and she didn't crack a smile. King is always polite, and he asked her a simple question, and she gave him a sarcastic reply. I could tell that Paul was embarrassed. I remember thinking that he was going to have his hands full with her. Total mismatch, as in he's a really nice guy, and she's a total moron.

Ireneparalegal
02-24-2007, 12:52 AM
I wouldn't take the british tabloids as the truth first of all.

Also, it was said late last year that many of the "stories" that came out of Britain abt Heather demanding $$$$ and other ludicrious claims were just that, stories, to sell newspapers and tabloid magazines. There was not an ounce of truth to them or they were greatly exaggerated, purely out of spite because Paul McCartney is their "son" and they wanted to make Heather look bad. Anyone remember Charles and Diana?

I am not too keen on Heather. I don't know what it is abt her, but she doesn't seem happy. I don't know, but if she did really love Paul, she should remember he is the father of their child. Anything you spew now will haunt you forever Heather. Then again, I love Tina Turner and anything she says abt Ike Turner (regardless if they have a son together) can never put her in a bad light.

ABlairican Pie
02-24-2007, 12:55 AM
I swear I saw right through that witch bitch the first time I laid eyes on her. They were on Larry King, and she didn't crack a smile. King is always polite, and he asked her a simple question, and she gave him a sarcastic reply. I could tell that Paul was embarrassed. I remember thinking that he was going to have his hands full with her. Total mismatch, as in he's a really nice guy, and she's a total moron.Maybe she lost a part of her brain and heart when she lost her leg.


I know, that was mean. But then so is she.

AKA
02-24-2007, 02:39 AM
I wouldn't take the british tabloids as the truth first of all.

If you go to the WHOIS database, you'll see that mcfartneys.com was registered in June of last year by the same company that owns Heather Mills' website. Hmm...

Cactus Jack
02-24-2007, 03:03 AM
I swear she makes Yoko Ono look like a saint (http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles1726.shtml)

Bobby F.
02-24-2007, 06:31 PM
Hmmm. South Park making a funny cartoon about Steve Irwins death is funny and not a big deal yet people are pissed about this......:crazy: :rolleyes:

AKA
02-24-2007, 11:11 PM
Hmmm. South Park making a funny cartoon about Steve Irwins death is funny and not a big deal yet people are pissed about this......:crazy: :rolleyes:
There's a difference between a fifteen-second bit on a long-running cartoon series about a man the creators have never had a connection to and basing an entire series on your ex-husband, the father of your child.

Anyway, Bobby, I know you have a hard-on for trying to make me look like a hypocrite (you must save my posts - that South Park episode, and the resultant thread, was four months ago), and normally, I'd take you up on the pissing match you so desperately seek, but right now I'm no condition to deal with your ****. Please be a dick to someone else. Thanks.

Penny Lane
02-25-2007, 11:59 AM
What a sick little bitch!:smash:

Bobby F.
02-25-2007, 06:19 PM
There's a difference between a fifteen-second bit on a long-running cartoon series about a man the creators have never had a connection to and basing an entire series on your ex-husband, the father of your child.

Anyway, Bobby, I know you have a hard-on for trying to make me look like a hypocrite (you must save my posts - that South Park episode, and the resultant thread, was four months ago), and normally, I'd take you up on the pissing match you so desperately seek, but right now I'm no condition to deal with your ****. Please be a dick to someone else. Thanks.

Awww. Did'ums get his widdle feeling hurt????

I don't need to make you look like a hypocrite. You do that very well yourself.:happyface

AKA
02-25-2007, 06:45 PM
Awww. Did'ums get his widdle feeling hurt????

I don't need to make you look like a hypocrite. You do that very well yourself.:happyface

Not really. As I said in the post above, I'm just not in any condition to deal with your ******* antics. I know you like to start **** with me (you registered multiple screen names solely for that purprose), but I'm asking you to get another punching back for the next week or two. Thanks.

Bobby F.
02-25-2007, 07:39 PM
Not really. As I said in the post above, I'm just not in any condition to deal with your ******* antics. I know you like to start **** with me (you registered multiple screen names solely for that purprose), but I'm asking you to get another punching back for the next week or two. Thanks.

Let's see.... you call me a dick and you're crying about how you're in no condition to deal with it. Does the word hypocrite once again apply to you????:lol: :lol: Go cry to someone else about being in "no condition". I could care less.

AKA
02-25-2007, 11:40 PM
Let's see.... you call me a dick and you're crying about how you're in no condition to deal with it. Does the word hypocrite once again apply to you????:lol: :lol: Go cry to someone else about being in "no condition". I could care less.

Let's see... the whole purpose of your initial post in this post was to call me out for my stance on the Steve Irwin bit on South Park vs. my stance on "The McFartneys." All you wanted to do in this thread was make me look like a hypocrite, adding ":crazy:" and ":rolleyes:" smileys.

So yes, I would consider that being a dick. Don't try and turn this around on me.

Bobby F.
02-26-2007, 09:37 AM
Let's see... the whole purpose of your initial post in this post was to call me out for my stance on the Steve Irwin bit on South Park vs. my stance on "The McFartneys." All you wanted to do in this thread was make me look like a hypocrite, adding ":crazy:" and ":rolleyes:" smileys.

So yes, I would consider that being a dick. Don't try and turn this around on me.

You're exactly right. I am pointing out your hypocricy about the Steve Irwin thread. But I'm not the one crying about being in no condition yet apparently can find the strength to call me a dick. Hypocricy again anyone???:lol: :lol:

I would have to say the the "dick" award would have to go to you for your inability to decided which way you want to go.

AKA
02-26-2007, 03:54 PM
You're really goot at starting ****, Bobby, but you're not too good at taking it in stride when someone takes you to task for it.

The whole point I've been trying to make is that your attack toward me in this thread was out of the blue, as is your M.O. So of course I'm going to say something about it (maybe the word "dick" was a bit harsh).

You've acted that way toward me for years, as I said earlier in the thread. You've even gone so far as to register screen names, after your original one was banned, just for the sake of hassling me. Can't you find better things to do with your time?

I'm asking you once again - please leave me alone.

Bobby F.
02-26-2007, 04:43 PM
You're really goot at starting ****, Bobby, but you're not too good at taking it in stride when someone takes you to task for it.

The whole point I've been trying to make is that your attack toward me in this thread was out of the blue, as is your M.O. So of course I'm going to say something about it (maybe the word "dick" was a bit harsh).

You've acted that way toward me for years, as I said earlier in the thread. You've even gone so far as to register screen names, after your original one was banned, just for the sake of hassling me. Can't you find better things to do with your time?

I'm asking you once again - please leave me alone.

but right now I'm no condition to deal with your ****

As I said in the post above, I'm just not in any condition to deal with your ******* antics.

Maybe if you tell me this one more time I'll think about it.:lol:

And how have you taken me to task??? All you've done is show that anytime anyone says anything about your precious Beatles they're all f'ed up. It was good enough for Irwin but not good enough for Sir Paul.:lol: Take your blinders off, boy.

How many more rules are planning on breaking in this thread??? Name calling and now acussing another member of using different screen names.:lol:

"I'm asking you once again - please leave me alone."

I'm not bugging you. You posted a statement on this message board. I responded to it and I didn't even quote you on it. You just took it upon yourself to think that it was directed at you (kinda stuck on yerself, don't ya think??:lol: ). Don't get all pissy when someone responds to a post and you don't like it. It's not healthy way to be.;)