View Full Version : Rhode Island school bans talking at lunch


bossradio93
01-26-2007, 10:27 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070125/ap_on_re_us/silent_lunch (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070125/ap_on_re_us/silent_lunch)

R.I. school bans talking at lunch

By JUSTIN M. NORTON, Associated Press Writer

Thu Jan 25, 6:22 PM ET

WARWICK, R.I. - Class, from now on there will be no talking at lunch.

A Roman Catholic elementary school adopted new lunchroom rules this week requiring students to remain silent while eating. The move comes after three recent choking incidents in the cafeteria.

No one was hurt, but the principal of St. Rose of Lima School explained in a letter to parents that if the lunchroom is loud, staff members cannot hear a child choking.

Christine Lamoureux, whose 12-year-old is a sixth-grader at the school, said she respects the safety issue but thinks the rule is a bad idea.

"They are silent all day," she said. "They have to get some type of release." She suggested quiet conversation be allowed during lunch.

Another mother, Thina Paone, does not mind the silent lunches, noting that the cafeteria "can be very crazy" at the suburban school south of Providence.

Principal Jeannine Fuller did not immediately return a call seeking comment, but a spokesman for the Diocese of Providence described the silence rule as a temporary safety measure.

Spokesman Michael Guilfoyle said the school does not expect complete silence but enough quiet to keep students safe.

Lori Healey, a teacher at the school who also has a son in third grade, said "silent lunch" means students can whisper.

"They know it's not for punishment," she said. "It's for safety, and they'll be the first ones to tell you."

Stacey Wildenhain, a teacher's assistant at St. Rose, said her 7-year-old son does not mind the policy. He told her: "The sooner we eat, the sooner we can get out to play," she said.

Amanda Karhuse, of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, said that students should not run wild during lunch, but that they also should not have to remain silent.

"It seems kind of ridiculous in our opinion," she said. "Kids need that social time, and they just need time to be kids at that age."

The principal's letter also spelled out other new lunch rules, including requiring students to stay in their seats and limiting them to one trip to the trash can. Any child who breaks the rules will serve detention the next day.

Paone's 6-year-old son, Joey, said he accepts the changes, but some of his classmates were having trouble obeying the rules.

Kara Casali, who also has a 6-year-old son at the school, said the rules against talking will be tough to enforce.

"I can't imagine having a silent lunch," she said.

___

On the Net:

St. Rose School: http://www.saintroseschool.com/

Yahoo! News/AP-January 25, 2007

Georgia's on my Mind
01-26-2007, 11:44 AM
umm...I went to this school. wow.

Mr. Cranky
01-26-2007, 12:12 PM
It's ridiculous. They should have special table for the kids who can't talk and chew at the same time and let the other kids be kids.

gilligan fanatic
01-26-2007, 12:17 PM
It's ridiculous. They should have special table for the kids who can't talk and chew at the same time and let the other kids be kids.

That sounds funny, but it would do the job.

It's like I can't eat and walk at the same time. They shouldn't ban food at my school because I tripped once.

Chelsea
01-26-2007, 01:00 PM
This is quite possibly the most ******** thing I've ever heard of.

THIS is what's wrong with parents and schools today.

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤
01-26-2007, 01:58 PM
We used to have silent lunches at our school too when we didnt use inside voices. Not for a week though.

Lee
01-26-2007, 03:27 PM
Originally posted by Seth:
This is quite possibly the most ******** thing I've ever heard of.

THIS is what's wrong with parents and schools today.


Blame the school but don't blame all the parents in this case. Some of them
disagree with the new rule.

EmoJoe
01-26-2007, 03:49 PM
lunch is ABOUT talking.

PrettyinPink55
01-26-2007, 07:56 PM
Oh man, that's just ridiculous!!!

Ireneparalegal
01-26-2007, 08:04 PM
If they didn't talk WITH FOOD IN THEIR MOUTHS, THEY WOULDN'T CHOKE TO BEGIN WITH!!!!!!

Michael [hXc]
01-26-2007, 08:05 PM
Whoever made that rule apparently doesn't know that lunch is not only about eating. It's a time to socialize with friends freely, which cannot be done during class or in between classes.

Mr. Television
01-26-2007, 08:06 PM
When I was in elementary school I was in some classes that couldn't talk during lunch. People took names and if you talked you were paddled. That's the way it was back then in NC anyhow.

Courtnee
01-26-2007, 08:29 PM
This is the kind of thing that makes children bring guns to school

dawsongirl
01-27-2007, 01:20 AM
ha...that wouldn't work for a second at my school. If the kids get so loud that the lunch ladies can't hear them, we'll occasionally try to do just whispering, or a couple minutes of no talking. Hardly ever works. But then, you know, after being yelled at all morning to shut up, lunch/recess is the only time to talk. And even adults would talk in that situation.

friendsfan77
01-27-2007, 08:45 AM
I also think that this is utterly ridiculous.
lunch is ABOUT talking.
I agree.

80sTrivia
01-27-2007, 12:03 PM
It's ridiculous. They should have special table for the kids who can't talk and chew at the same time and let the other kids be kids.

:lol: It's sad, but very true... :eek:

Ireneparalegal
01-27-2007, 07:20 PM
It's ridiculous. They should have special table for the kids who can't talk and chew at the same time and let the other kids be kids.
Talking with food in their mouths is what causes them to CHOKE!:eek: If the kids ate their food THEN talk with their mouths empty, there wouldn't be a problem. :crazy:

tdf4077
01-27-2007, 08:57 PM
Well, as a teacher who has to supervise kids in the cafeteria, I like the idea as the migraine I walk away with is unfortunate. But, in a normal situation, lunch is when the kids get the talking out of the systems so they will be quite in the classrooms (though this doesn't work at my school lol)

dawsongirl
01-28-2007, 02:31 AM
Well, as a teacher who has to supervise kids in the cafeteria, I like the idea as the migraine I walk away with is unfortunate. But, in a normal situation, lunch is when the kids get the talking out of the systems so they will be quite in the classrooms (though this doesn't work at my school lol)
lol, mine either. I'm in our lunchroom for only maybe 10 minutes at most, but I'm usually glad to go outside for recess duty. The talking isn't loud out there.

Sharop
01-28-2007, 08:22 AM
The reason behind the decision is honourable, but it seems to be quite an extreme measure.

tdf4077
01-28-2007, 12:43 PM
lol, mine either. I'm in our lunchroom for only maybe 10 minutes at most, but I'm usually glad to go outside for recess duty. The talking isn't loud out there.

Unfortunately, we don't have recess :(

Hollow
01-28-2007, 06:29 PM
If they didn't talk WITH FOOD IN THEIR MOUTHS, THEY WOULDN'T CHOKE TO BEGIN WITH!!!!!!
they're children.

dawsongirl
01-29-2007, 02:29 AM
Unfortunately, we don't have recess :(
eep!