Do you think it would have sounded better if they saiid he was a wide receiver instead of a running back? Keith to me was build more like a Wide receiver not a riunning back.. Usually running backs are STOCKIER and not as THIN as keith. What do you think? I say they could have said he was a QB or WR

Do you think it would have sounded better if they saiid he was a wide receiver instead of a running back? Keith to me was build more like a Wide receiver not a riunning back.. Usually running backs are STOCKIER and not as THIN as keith. What do you think? I say they could have said he was a QB or WR

Yeah, I thought he was more built like a wide out myself. I was about to post a topic about him. Anyway, I would think he would be a little too washed up to be called up by the Bears. C'mon, he drove a Taxi for a year, dranked, and he didn't seem to train that much.

Yeah, I thought he was more built like a wide out myself. I was about to post a topic about him. Anyway, I would think he would be a little too washed up to be called up by the Bears. C'mon, he drove a Taxi for a year, dranked, and he didn't seem to train that much.


Another thing was he was buying a NEW APT and was even a Starter YEt-lol Nothing but a free agent

i always thought he would have made a better wide receiver than running back too

I always noticed that myself. Keith was bit scrawny for a running back.

It would've made a lot more sense for Keith to be a wide receiver or maybe even a quarterback. Too bad we never actually got to see him in uniform...:drool: :lol: