|
View Full Version : Since Roper and Furley were both cheap..... GARFIELDKOOL 07-02-2006, 11:50 AM ....which one if it came down to it, would spend a lot money if they had to in any situation? I would say Furley, only because he lent Jack $800 to open the Bistro. Even though his mouth moved quicker than his brain did in that situation. Brian Damage 07-02-2006, 12:42 PM Mr. Furley seemed more inclined to spend money than the thrifty Mr. Roper. GARFIELDKOOL 07-02-2006, 12:52 PM Mr. Furley seemed more inclined to spend money than the thrifty Mr. Roper. Yeah, Roper didn't want to spend $2 on some paper plates. That's just too cheap. TVFactFan 07-02-2006, 02:06 PM Mr. Roper also didn't want to lend Jack a $100 in the Catering Episode in season 3 gilligan fanatic 07-12-2006, 07:17 PM Mr. Roper also didn't want to lend Jack a $100 in the Catering Episode in season 3 he wanted Jack to pay his dollar that got stolen-lol PrettyinPink55 07-13-2006, 01:24 AM I say Mr. Furley. Like you said, he did give Jack the money to open the Bistro! comedyfreak 07-13-2006, 03:24 AM Furley would spend money if he had to. |